IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v274y2022ics0378377422004863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knitted-sock geotextile envelopes increase drain inflow in subsurface drainage systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ghane, Ehsan
  • Dialameh, Babak
  • AbdalAal, Yousef
  • Ghane, Mohammad

Abstract

A knitted-sock geotextile envelope is commonly used in the USA, Canada, and parts of Europe to prevent sediment entry into agricultural subsurface drain pipes. Sand-slot pipes have a narrow width to prevent sediment from moving into the drain pipe, and they are used in the USA and Canada as a cheaper alternative to knitted-sock-wrapped pipes. The type of drain pipe (sand-slot or sock-wrapped) is important in subsurface drainage design because it affects the entrance head loss caused by the convergence of flowlines toward the drain perforations, thereby influencing the effective radius of the pipe, which in turn affects drain inflow. Although the theoretical effective radius of a knitted-sock-wrapped pipe can be estimated based on analytical equations, no study has experimentally measured it to verify the theoretical equations. This study had two objectives: (1) Experimentally measure the effective radius of sock-wrapped and sand-slot pipes to verify the theoretical method, and (2) comparatively evaluate the drain inflow performance of a sock-wrapped pipe and a sand-slot pipe. We tested the pipe materials in a sand-tank experiment equipped with manometers. The results showed that the measured and theoretical effective radii were 5.5 and 5.6 cm for the sock-wrapped pipe, 0.7 and 0.7 cm for the 4-row sand-slot pipe, and 1.6 and 1.6 cm for the 8-row sand-slot pipe, respectively. This agreement confirmed that the theoretical method reliably estimated the effective radius of the pipes. The sock-wrapped pipe had a considerably lower entrance head loss (0.4 cm) than the 8-row (6.1 cm) and 4-row (10.4 cm) sand-slot pipes, thereby increasing the effective radius of the sock-wrapped pipe. The estimated drain inflow of the sock-wrapped pipe was 12% and 20% higher than that of the 8-row and 4-row sand-slot pipes, respectively. In conclusion, we verified that the theoretical method accurately estimated the effective radius of the pipes and demonstrated that the sock-wrapped pipe had considerably higher drain inflow than the sand-slot pipe.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghane, Ehsan & Dialameh, Babak & AbdalAal, Yousef & Ghane, Mohammad, 2022. "Knitted-sock geotextile envelopes increase drain inflow in subsurface drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:274:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004863
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422004863
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alavi, Seyed Abdollah & Naseri, Abd Ali & Bazaz, Azam & Ritzema, Henk & Hellegers, Petra, 2021. "Performance evaluation of the Hydroluis drainpipe-envelope system in a saline-sodic soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. van der Molen, W. H. & Wesseling, J., 1991. "A solution in closed form and a series solution to replace the tables for the thickness of the equivalent layer in Hooghoudt's drain spacing formula," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Stuyt, L.C. P.M. & Dierickx, W., 2006. "Design and performance of materials for subsurface drainage systems in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 50-59, November.
    4. Sekendar, M. A., 1984. "Entrance resistance of enveloped drainage pipes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 351-360, February.
    5. Rimidis, A. & Dierickx, W., 2004. "Field research on the performance of various drainage materials in Lithuania," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 151-175, August.
    6. Dierickx, W. & Van Der Molen, W. H., 1981. "Effect of perforation shape and pattern on the performance of drain pipes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 429-443, December.
    7. Ghane, Ehsan & Askar, Manal H., 2021. "Predicting the effect of drain depth on profitability and hydrology of subsurface drainage systems across the eastern USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    8. Ghane, Ehsan & Askar, Manal H. & Skaggs, R. Wayne, 2021. "Design drainage rates to optimize crop production for subsurface-drained fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shokrana, Md Sami Bin & Ghane, Ehsan & Abdalaal, Yousef & Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan, 2023. "Predicting the effect of weir management on the discharge of a controlled drainage system in a changing climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    2. Ghane, Ehsan & Askar, Manal H., 2021. "Predicting the effect of drain depth on profitability and hydrology of subsurface drainage systems across the eastern USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Ghane, Ehsan & Askar, Manal H. & Skaggs, R. Wayne, 2021. "Design drainage rates to optimize crop production for subsurface-drained fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Feng Tian & Haibin Shi & Qingfeng Miao & Ruiping Li & Jie Duan & Xu Dou & Weiying Feng, 2023. "Soil Water and Salt Transport in Severe Saline–Alkali Soil after Ditching under Subsurface Pipe Drainage Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Guo, Chenyao & Jiang, Xinman & Wu, Jingwei & Qin, Shuai & He, Shuai & Yang, Haoyu & Zhang, Rui & Yao, Chenzhi, 2024. "Risk evaluation for the combined clogging of subsurface drainage envelopes in arid areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    6. Zhe Wu & Chenyao Guo & Haoyu Yang & Hang Li & Jingwei Wu, 2022. "Experimentally Based Numerical Simulation of the Influence of the Agricultural Subsurface Drainage Pipe Geometric Structure on Drainage Flow," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Rong Tang & Xiugui Wang & Xudong Han & Yihui Yan & Shuang Huang & Jiesheng Huang & Tao Shen & Youzhen Wang & Jia Liu, 2022. "Effects of Combined Main Ditch and Field Ditch Control Measures on Crop Yield and Drainage Discharge in the Northern Huaihe River Plain, Anhui Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Raats, Peter A.C. & Feddes, Reinder A., 2006. "Contributions by Jans Wesseling, Jan van Schilfgaarde, and Herman Bouwer to effective and responsible water management in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 9-29, November.
    9. Cooke, R. A. & Badiger, S. & Garcia, A. M., 2001. "Drainage equations for random and irregular tile drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 207-224, June.
    10. Tao, Yuan & Wang, Shaoli & Xu, Di & Yuan, Hongwei & Chen, Haorui, 2017. "Field and numerical experiment of an improved subsurface drainage system in Huaibei plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 24-32.
    11. Ritzema, H.P. & Nijland, H.J. & Croon, F.W., 2006. "Subsurface drainage practices: From manual installation to large-scale implementation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 60-71, November.
    12. Jeroen A. Veraart & Rianne Duinen & Jan Vreke, 2017. "Evaluation of Socio-Economic Factors that Determine Adoption of Climate Compatible Freshwater Supply Measures at Farm Level: a Case Study in the Southwest Netherlands," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(2), pages 587-608, January.
    13. Yasir Abduljaleel & Ahmed Awad & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Ali Salem & Abdelazim Negm & Mohamed Elsayed Gabr, 2023. "Assessment of Subsurface Drainage Strategies Using DRAINMOD Model for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Alavi, Seyed Abdollah & Naseri, Abd Ali & Bazaz, Azam & Ritzema, Henk & Hellegers, Petra, 2021. "Performance evaluation of the Hydroluis drainpipe-envelope system in a saline-sodic soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    15. Stuyt, L.C. P.M. & Dierickx, W., 2006. "Design and performance of materials for subsurface drainage systems in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(1-2), pages 50-59, November.
    16. Barbara Kęsicka & Rafał Stasik & Michał Kozłowski & Adam Choryński, 2023. "Is Controlled Drainage of Agricultural Land a Common Used Practice?—A Bibliographic Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:274:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.