IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v177y2016icp440-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating yield potential by irrigation and yield gap of rainfed soybean using APEX model in a humid region

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Bangbang
  • Feng, Gary
  • Kong, Xiangbin
  • Lal, Rattan
  • Ouyang, Ying
  • Adeli, Ardeshir
  • Jenkins, Johnie N.

Abstract

Soybean is generally grown under rainfed conditions in a humid region, Mississippi, USA. In order to determine how much maximum yield could be increased by irrigation, it is crucial to investigate the yield potential (Yp) without any drought stress and yield gap (Yg, between Yp and rainfed yield (Yw)). Further, it is also important to determine the amount of irrigation water needed to alleviate any drought stress during the entire growing season, and conduct cost-return analysis for irrigated soybean. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (1) simulate Yp, analyze Yg and determine the irrigation timing and amount needed to achieve Yp for soybean using the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model; and (2) compute water use efficiency (WUE), irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) and conduct the cost-return analysis on irrigation events. Simulated Yp of soybean without water stress for nine soil types from 2002 to 2014 ranged from 4.47 to 6.51Mgha−1, and was strongly correlated with accumulative solar radiation during the growing season (R2=0.71, P≤0.01). The Yg in dry years was much higher than that in normal and wet years, with average Yg of 1.58, 0.60 and 0.71Mgha−1 for dry, normal and wet years, respectively. Griffith, Sumter and Demopolis soils had the highest average Yg over 13 years, ranging from 1.37 to 1.60Mgha−1. The average irrigation amount was 308, 192 and 157mm in dry, normal and wet years, respectively. The average irrigation amount was 75mm from R1 to R8 stages. The WUE of nine soil types from 2002 to 2014, under non-limiting water conditions, ranged from 9.5 to 13.8kgha−1mm−1. The magnitude of Yg was the principle factor affecting IWUE among nine soil types. The average IWUE over 13 years ranged from 1.8 to 7.8kgha−1mm−1 for nine soil types. Compared with a rainfed condition, average net return of irrigated soybean increased by 93 $ ha−1 (dollar per hectare) among nine soil types from 2002 to 2014. The average net return increased by 195, 58 and 70 $ ha−1 for dry, normal and wet years, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Bangbang & Feng, Gary & Kong, Xiangbin & Lal, Rattan & Ouyang, Ying & Adeli, Ardeshir & Jenkins, Johnie N., 2016. "Simulating yield potential by irrigation and yield gap of rainfed soybean using APEX model in a humid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 440-453.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:440-453
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416303237
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mullen, Jeffrey D. & Yu, Yingzhuo & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2009. "Estimating the demand for irrigation water in a humid climate: A case study from the southeastern United States," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1421-1428, October.
    2. Garcia y Garcia, A. & Persson, T. & Guerra, L.C. & Hoogenboom, G., 2010. "Response of soybean genotypes to different irrigation regimes in a humid region of the southeastern USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(7), pages 981-987, July.
    3. Nijbroek, Ravic & Hoogenboom, Gerrit & Jones, James W., 2003. "Optimizing irrigation management for a spatially variable soybean field," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 359-377, April.
    4. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 243-243, December.
    5. Karam, Fadi & Masaad, Randa & Sfeir, Therese & Mounzer, Oussama & Rouphael, Youssef, 2005. "Evapotranspiration and seed yield of field grown soybean under deficit irrigation conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 226-244, July.
    6. Anonymous, 2013. "Introduction to the Issue," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 129-130, November.
    7. Payero, José O. & Tarkalson, David D. & Irmak, Suat & Davison, Don & Petersen, James L., 2008. "Effect of irrigation amounts applied with subsurface drip irrigation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency, and dry matter production in a semiarid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 895-908, August.
    8. Zhang, Bangbang & Feng, Gary & Read, John J. & Kong, Xiangbin & Ouyang, Ying & Adeli, Ardeshir & Jenkins, Johnie N., 2016. "Simulating soybean productivity under rainfed conditions for major soil types using APEX model in East Central Mississippi," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 379-391.
    9. Powers, S.E. & Ascough, J.C. & Nelson, R.G. & Larocque, G.R., 2011. "Modeling water and soil quality environmental impacts associated with bioenergy crop production and biomass removal in the Midwest USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2430-2447.
    10. Hook, James E., 1994. "Using crop models to plan water withdrawals for irrigation in drought years," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 271-289.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Yao & Wang, Hongya, 2019. "Modeling the impacts of agricultural management strategies on crop yields and sediment yields using APEX in Guizhou Plateau, southwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 325-338.
    2. Zhang, Bangbang & Feng, Gary & Ahuja, Lajpat R. & Kong, Xiangbin & Ouyang, Ying & Adeli, Ardeshir & Jenkins, Johnie N., 2018. "Soybean crop-water production functions in a humid region across years and soils determined with APEX model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 180-191.
    3. Feng, Kuishuang & Chen, Xiangjie, 2023. "Water and Land Stress in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru under Coupled Climate-Socioeconomic Scenarios," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13093, Inter-American Development Bank.
    4. Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Xian & Chen, Haibin & Niu, Wenhao & Kong, Xiangbin & Yu, Qiang & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Identifying opportunities to close yield gaps in China by use of certificated cultivars to estimate potential productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Joe F. Bozeman & Rayne Bozeman & Thomas L. Theis, 2020. "Overcoming climate change adaptation barriers: A study on food–energy–water impacts of the average American diet by demographic group," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(2), pages 383-399, April.
    6. da Silva, Evandro H.F.M. & Gonçalves, Alexandre O. & Pereira, Rodolfo A. & Fattori Júnior, Izael M. & Sobenko, Luiz R. & Marin, Fábio R., 2019. "Soybean irrigation requirements and canopy-atmosphere coupling in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-7.
    7. Zhao, Jie & Zhang, Xuepeng & Yang, Yadong & Zang, Huadong & Yan, Peng & Meki, Manyowa N. & Doro, Luca & Sui, Peng & Jeong, Jaehak & Zeng, Zhaohai, 2021. "Alternative cropping systems for groundwater irrigation sustainability in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Bangbang & Feng, Gary & Ahuja, Lajpat R. & Kong, Xiangbin & Ouyang, Ying & Adeli, Ardeshir & Jenkins, Johnie N., 2018. "Soybean crop-water production functions in a humid region across years and soils determined with APEX model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 180-191.
    2. Salazar, M.R. & Hook, J.E. & Garcia y Garcia, A. & Paz, J.O. & Chaves, B. & Hoogenboom, G., 2012. "Estimating irrigation water use for maize in the Southeastern USA: A modeling approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 104-111.
    3. Hamze, Mohamad & Cheviron, Bruno & Baghdadi, Nicolas & Lo, Madiop & Courault, Dominique & Zribi, Mehrez, 2023. "Detection of irrigation dates and amounts on maize plots from the integration of Sentinel-2 derived Leaf Area Index values in the Optirrig crop model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Ranjana Raghunathan, 2022. "Everyday Intimacies and Inter-Ethnic Relationships: Tracing Entanglements of Gender and Race in Multicultural Singapore," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 77-94, March.
    5. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    6. Lamperti, Francesco & Bosetti, Valentina & Roventini, Andrea & Tavoni, Massimo & Treibich, Tania, 2021. "Three green financial policies to address climate risks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    7. Songsore, Emmanuel & Buzzelli, Michael, 2014. "Social responses to wind energy development in Ontario: The influence of health risk perceptions and associated concerns," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 285-296.
    8. Tapsuwan, Sorada & Polyakov, Maksym & Bark, Rosalind & Nolan, Martin, 2015. "Valuing the Barmah–Millewa Forest and in stream river flows: A spatial heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (SHAC) approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 98-105.
    9. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John List & Claire Mackevicius & Min Sok Lee & Dana Suskind, 2019. "How Can Experiments Play a Greater Role in Public Policy? 12 Proposals from an Economic Model of Scaling," Artefactual Field Experiments 00679, The Field Experiments Website.
    10. Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal & Laroche, Michel, 2015. "The impact of materialism and anti-consumption lifestyles on personal debt and account balances," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 654-664.
    11. Bertschek, Irene & Kesler, Reinhold, 2022. "Let the user speak: Is feedback on Facebook a source of firms’ innovation?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Avelino, Flor & Wittmayer, Julia M. & Pel, Bonno & Weaver, Paul & Dumitru, Adina & Haxeltine, Alex & Kemp, René & Jørgensen, Michael S. & Bauler, Tom & Ruijsink, Saskia & O'Riordan, Tim, 2019. "Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 195-206.
    13. Gigi Foster, 2020. "The behavioural economics of government responses to COVID-19," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(S3), pages 11-43, December.
    14. Audoly, Richard & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien & Guivarch, Céline & Pfeiffer, Alexander, 2018. "Pathways toward zero-carbon electricity required for climate stabilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 884-901.
    15. Gerards, Ruud & Welters, Ricardo, 2016. "Impact of financial pressure on unemployed job search, job find success and job quality," ROA Research Memorandum 008, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    16. Cairns, George & Wright, George & Fairbrother, Peter, 2016. "Promoting articulated action from diverse stakeholders in response to public policy scenarios: A case analysis of the use of ‘scenario improvisation’ method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 97-108.
    17. Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia & Elena-Mădălina Teodor & Doina Fotache & Magdalena Danileţ, 2019. "Opinion Mining on Social Media Data: Sentiment Analysis of User Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Cailong Xu & Ruidong Li & Wenwen Song & Tingting Wu & Shi Sun & Shuixiu Hu & Tianfu Han & Cunxiang Wu, 2021. "Responses of Branch Number and Yield Component of Soybean Cultivars Tested in Different Planting Densities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    19. Romaniuk, Jenni & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda, 2016. "Lapsed buyers' durable brand consideration in emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3645-3651.
    20. Caitlin Robinson & Stefan Bouzarovski & Sarah Lindley, 2018. "Underrepresenting neighbourhood vulnerabilities? The measurement of fuel poverty in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(5), pages 1109-1127, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:440-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.