IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v190y2021ics0308521x21000718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Silvopastoral systems and multi-criteria optimization for compatible economic and environmental outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Bussoni, Adriana
  • Cubbage, Frederick
  • Alvarez Giambruno, Jorge

Abstract

Forestry production can provide a valuable commodity and environmental services to complement cattle farming through the mitigation of greenhouse gases (GHG) from meat production, allowing more intensive use of natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Bussoni, Adriana & Cubbage, Frederick & Alvarez Giambruno, Jorge, 2021. "Silvopastoral systems and multi-criteria optimization for compatible economic and environmental outcomes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:190:y:2021:i:c:s0308521x21000718
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X21000718
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claytor, Hannah S. & Clark, Christopher D. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Jensen, Kimberly L., 2018. "Cattle producer willingness to afforest pastureland and sequester carbon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 43-54.
    2. de Oliveira Silva, Rafael & Barioni, Luis G. & Albertini, Tiago Zanett & Eory, Vera & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & Fernandes, Fernando A. & Moran, Dominic, 2015. "Developing a nationally appropriate mitigation measure from the greenhouse gas GHG abatement potential from livestock production in the Brazilian Cerrado," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 48-55.
    3. Dylan Jones & Mehrdad Tamiz, 2010. "Practical Goal Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 1, number 978-1-4419-5771-9, December.
    4. Davis, James & Rausser, Gordon, 2020. "Amending conservation programs through expanding choice architecture: A case study of forestry and livestock producers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Rodriguez Uria, M. Victoria & Caballero, Rafael & Ruiz, Francisco & Romero, Carlos, 2002. "Meta-goal programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 422-429, January.
    6. Subak, Susan, 1999. "Global environmental costs of beef production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 79-91, July.
    7. Kanter, David R. & Musumba, Mark & Wood, Sylvia L.R. & Palm, Cheryl & Antle, John & Balvanera, Patricia & Dale, Virginia H. & Havlik, Petr & Kline, Keith L. & Scholes, R.J. & Thornton, Philip & Titton, 2018. "Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 73-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Dylan & Jimenez, Mariano, 2013. "Incorporating additional meta-objectives into the extended lexicographic goal programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 343-349.
    2. Hocine, Amine, 2018. "Meta goal programing approach for solving multi-criteria de Novo programing problemAuthor-Name: Zhuang, Zheng-Yun," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 228-238.
    3. Benítez-Fernández, Amalia & Ruiz, Francisco, 2020. "A Meta-Goal Programming approach to cardinal preferences aggregation in multicriteria problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2011. "Multi-choice goal programming with utility functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 439-445, December.
    5. Hocine, Amin & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Li, Der-Chiang, 2020. "Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 642-654.
    6. Jones, Dylan, 2011. "A practical weight sensitivity algorithm for goal and multiple objective programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 238-245, August.
    7. Hocine, Amin & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Lozza, Sergio Ortobelli & Aouam, Tarik, 2024. "Modelling De novo programming within Simon’s satisficing theory: Methods and application in designing an optimal offshore wind farm location system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 289-306.
    8. Jones, Dylan & Florentino, Helenice & Cantane, Daniela & Oliveira, Rogerio, 2016. "An extended goal programming methodology for analysis of a network encompassing multiple objectives and stakeholders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 845-855.
    9. Jones, D.F. & Treloar, R. & Ouelhadj, D. & Glampedakis, A. & Bartmeyer, P., 2024. "Incorporation of poverty principles into goal programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Francisco Salas-Molina & Filippo Bistaffa & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, 2024. "A General Approach for Computing a Consensus in Group Decision Making That Integrates Multiple Ethical Principles," Papers 2401.07818, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    11. Ramos, Francisco López & Batres, Rafael & De-la-Cruz-Márquez, Cynthia Griselle & Anzures, Melina López, 2023. "Optimization models for nopal crop planning with land usage expansion and government subsidy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Fiala, Nathan, 2008. "Meeting the demand: An estimation of potential future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 412-419, October.
    13. Walter Briec & Laurent Cavaignac & Kristiaan Kerstens, 2020. "Input Efficiency Measures: A Generalized, Encompassing Formulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1836-1849, November.
    14. Carland, Corinne & Goentzel, Jarrod & Montibeller, Gilberto, 2018. "Modeling the values of private sector agents in multi-echelon humanitarian supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 532-543.
    15. Zgajnar, Jaka & Kavcic, Stane, 2012. "Farm management support based on mathematical programming; an example of fertilization planning," Agroeconomia Croatica, Croatian Society of Agricultural Economists, vol. 2(1), pages 1-8, March.
    16. Huang, Zishuo & Yu, Hang & Chu, Xiangyang & Peng, Zhenwei, 2017. "A goal programming based model system for community energy plan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 893-901.
    17. Mohammad Taleghani, 2017. "Synergistic Role of Balanced Scorecard/Activity Based Costing and Goal Programming Combined Model on Strategic Cost Management," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 586-593.
    18. Foad Mahdavi Pajouh & Dahai Xing & Yingjue Zhou & Sharethram Hariharan & Balabhaskar Balasundaram & Tieming Liu & Ramesh Sharda, 2013. "A Specialty Steel Bar Company Uses Analytics to Determine Available-to-Promise Dates," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 503-517, December.
    19. Eigner, Amanda E. & Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2019. "Applied spatial approach of modelling field size changes based on a consideration of farm and landscape interrelations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. White, Robin R. & Brady, Michael & Capper, Judith L. & Johnson, Kristen A., 2014. "Optimizing diet and pasture management to improve sustainability of U.S. beef production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-12.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:190:y:2021:i:c:s0308521x21000718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.