IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v154y2017icp25-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversity of high-latitude agricultural landscapes and crop rotations: Increased, decreased or back and forth?

Author

Listed:
  • Peltonen-Sainio, Pirjo
  • Jauhiainen, Lauri
  • Sorvali, Jaana

Abstract

Land use change is a continuously on-going process that has many impacts on the environmental footprint of agriculture and especially on the biodiversity of agricultural landscapes. This study used field scale data from 1995 to 2011 (165,760 field parcels) on a study region that represents the prime crop production area of Finland, to assess how agricultural land use has changed since the launching of the EU Common Agricultural Policy. Six five-year crop rotation types were identified: cereal species monoculture, cereal monoculture, rotation with a break-crop, diverse crop rotation, perennial, non-permanent grassland rotation and environmental fallow rotation. Shifts in the frequencies of different crop rotation types and composition of their crop species were monitored. Furthermore, the contribution of different field characteristics, on a farmer's land allocation to different rotation types, was assessed. The ultimate goal was to understand whether land use changes, in general, have contributed to any increase in heterogeneity of landscapes and whether they have impacted diversity of crop rotation types. We found that different crop rotation types were applied on a farm, but that farmers have quite consistent drivers for land allocation to different rotation types; although, economic incentives influence the introduction, expansion and/or withdrawal of crops from rotations. The farmers' readiness to implement land use changes was dependent on farm size. There has been a shift towards lower shares of cereal species monocultures, grassland rotations and diverse crop rotations, while environmental fallow rotations have increased. According to the five-year rotation plans shared by 16 interviewed farmers, there was a noted desire for more diverse rotation types originating from adverse experiences with cereal monocultures and soil degradation; however, they were keen on reducing the number of environmental fallows and concentrating on food production. It is important to carry out follow-up studies to understand the impacts of the demonstrated and anticipated land use changes on biodiversity. Future policy development should benefit from a gained understanding of the drivers of farmers' decisions for facilitating unimpeded implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Peltonen-Sainio, Pirjo & Jauhiainen, Lauri & Sorvali, Jaana, 2017. "Diversity of high-latitude agricultural landscapes and crop rotations: Increased, decreased or back and forth?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 25-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:154:y:2017:i:c:p:25-33
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X16303559
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Xing & Lehtonen, Heikki & Purola, Tuomo & Pavlova, Yulia & Rötter, Reimund & Palosuo, Taru, 2016. "Dynamic economic modelling of crop rotations with farm management practices under future pest pressure," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 65-76.
    2. van der Sluis, Theo & Pedroli, Bas & Kristensen, Søren B.P. & Lavinia Cosor, Georgia & Pavlis, Evangelos, 2016. "Changing land use intensity in Europe – Recent processes in selected case studies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 777-785.
    3. Castellazzi, M.S. & Wood, G.A. & Burgess, P.J. & Morris, J. & Conrad, K.F. & Perry, J.N., 2008. "A systematic representation of crop rotations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 97(1-2), pages 26-33, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elina Lehikoinen & Tuure Parviainen & Juha Helenius & Mika Jalava & Arto O. Salonen & Matti Kummu, 2019. "Cattle Production for Exports in Water-Abundant Areas: The Case of Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Peltonen-Sainio, Pirjo & Jauhiainen, Lauri & Laurila, Heikki & Sorvali, Jaana & Honkavaara, Eija & Wittke, Samantha & Karjalainen, Mika & Puttonen, Eetu, 2019. "Land use optimization tool for sustainable intensification of high-latitude agricultural systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva & Mateus Batistella & James D. A. Millington & Emilio Moran & Luiz A. Martinelli & Yue Dou & Jianguo Liu, 2020. "Three Decades of Changes in Brazilian Municipalities and Their Food Production Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio & Lauri Jauhiainen, 2019. "Risk of Low Productivity is Dependent on Farm Characteristics: How to Turn Poor Performance into an Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Biarnès, Anne & Bailly, Jean-Stéphane & Mekki, Insaf & Ferchichi, Intissar, 2021. "Land use mosaics in Mediterranean rainfed agricultural areas as an indicator of collective crop successions: Insights from a land use time series study conducted in Cap Bon, Tunisia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. Peltonen-Sainio, Pirjo & Niemi, Mari & Jauhiainen, Lauri, 2024. "Legacy effects of crop sequencing on biomass and their variability on farmers' fields in Finland are shaped by weather, farm conditions and rationales for land use," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Heikki Lehtonen & Taru Palosuo & Panu Korhonen & Xing Liu, 2018. "Higher Crop Yield Levels in the North Savo Region—Means and Challenges Indicated by Farmers and Their Close Stakeholders," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Peltonen-Sainio, Pirjo & Jauhiainen, Lauri & Sorvali, Jaana & Laurila, Heikki & Rajala, Ari, 2018. "Field characteristics driving farm-scale decision-making on land allocation to primary crops in high latitude conditions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 49-59.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruiz-Martinez, I. & Martinetti, D. & Marraccini, E. & Debolini, M., 2022. "Modeling drivers of farming system trajectories in Mediterranean peri-urban regions: Two case studies in Avignon (France) and Pisa (Italy)," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Lucie Kupková & Ivan Bičík & Leoš Jeleček, 2021. "At the Crossroads of European Landscape Changes: Major Processes of Landscape Change in Czechia since the Middle of the 19th Century and Their Driving Forces," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Atef A. M. Zen El-Dein & Mohamed H. M. Koriem & Moodi Saham Alsubeie & Reem A. Alsalmi & Abdurrahman S. Masrahi & Nadi Awad Al-Harbi & Salem Mesfir Al-Qahtani & Mamdouh M. A. Awad-Allah & Yaser A. A. , 2022. "Effect of Mycorrhiza Fungi, Preceding Crops, Mineral and Bio Fertilizers on Maize Intercropping with Cowpea," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Li Yu & Zhanqi Wang & Hongwei Zhang & Chao Wei, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Differentiation Analysis of Agricultural Land Use Intensity and Its Driving Factors at the County Scale: A Case Study in Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Purola, Tuomo & Lehtonen, Heikki, 2020. "Evaluating profitability of soil-renovation investments under crop rotation constraints in Finland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Moreau, Pierre & Ruiz, Laurent & Vertès, Françoise & Baratte, Christine & Delaby, Luc & Faverdin, Philippe & Gascuel-Odoux, Chantal & Piquemal, Benoit & Ramat, Eric & Salmon-Monviola, Jordy & Durand, , 2013. "CASIMOD’N: An agro-hydrological distributed model of catchment-scale nitrogen dynamics integrating farming system decisions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 41-51.
    7. Koiry, Subrata & Huang, Wei, 2023. "Do ecological protection approaches affect total factor productivity change of cropland production in Sweden?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Ibirénoyé Romaric Sodjahin & Fabienne Femenia & Obafemi Philippe Koutchade & A. Carpentier, 2022. "On the economic value of the agronomic effects of crop diversification for farmers: estimation based on farm cost accounting data [Valeur économique des effets agronomiques de la diversification de," Working Papers hal-03639951, HAL.
    9. Matthew C. LaFevor & Alexandra G. Ponette-González & Rebecca Larson & Leah M. Mungai, 2021. "Spatial Targeting of Agricultural Support Measures: Indicator-Based Assessment of Coverages and Leakages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Song, Xiaoqing & Wang, Xiong & Hu, Shougeng & Xiao, Renbin & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2022. "Functional transition of cultivated ecosystems: Underlying mechanisms and policy implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Salassi, Michael E. & Deliberto, Michael A. & Guidry, Kurt M., 2013. "Economically optimal crop sequences using risk-adjusted network flows: Modeling cotton crop rotations in the southeastern United States," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 33-40.
    12. Juventia, Stella D. & Selin Norén, Isabella L.M. & van Apeldoorn, Dirk F. & Ditzler, Lenora & Rossing, Walter A.H., 2022. "Spatio-temporal design of strip cropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Jitka JANOVÁ, 2014. "Crop plan optimization under risk on a farm level in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(3), pages 123-132.
    14. Guido M. Bazzani & Roberta Spadoni, 2021. "Generating cropping schemes from FADN data at the farm and territorial scale," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-32.
    15. Quanfeng Li & Zhe Dong & Guoming Du & Aizheng Yang, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Use Intensification in Village Settings: A Survey of Typical Chinese Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Deininger,Klaus W. & Ali,Daniel Ayalew & Kussul,Nataliia & Lavreniuk,Mykola & Nivievskyi,Oleg, 2020. "Using Machine Learning to Assess Yield Impacts of Crop Rotation : Combining Satellite and Statistical Data for Ukraine," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9306, The World Bank.
    17. Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid & Uwe A. Schneider, 2009. "CropRota – A Model to Generate Optimal Crop Rotations from Observed Land Use," Working Papers 452009, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    18. Jitka Janová, 2012. "Crop planning optimization model: the validation and verification processes," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(3), pages 451-462, September.
    19. Ke, Xinli & Chen, Jing & Zuo, Chengchao & Wang, Xiaoqian, 2024. "The cropland intensive utilisation transition in China: An induced factor substitution perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Pfeiffer, Lisa & Lin, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2014. "Does efficient irrigation technology lead to reduced groundwater extraction? Empirical evidence," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 189-208.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:154:y:2017:i:c:p:25-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.