IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v125y2014icp50-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary: A critical assessment of the policy endorsement for holistic management

Author

Listed:
  • Briske, David D.
  • Ash, Andrew J.
  • Derner, Justin D.
  • Huntsinger, Lynn

Abstract

This commentary summarizes the evidence supporting holistic management (HM) and intensive rotational grazing (IRG) to demonstrate the extent to which Sherren and coauthors (2012) have overstated their policy endorsement of HM for rangeland application. Five major points are presented – distinction between HM and IRG, insufficient evaluation of the contradictory evidence, limitations of the experimental approach, additional costs associated with IRG, and heterogeneous capabilities and goals of graziers’ to manage intensive strategies – to justify why this policy endorsement is ill-advised. The vast majority of experimental evidence does not support claims of enhanced ecological benefits in IRG compared to other grazing strategies, including the capacity to increase storage of soil organic carbon.

Suggested Citation

  • Briske, David D. & Ash, Andrew J. & Derner, Justin D. & Huntsinger, Lynn, 2014. "Commentary: A critical assessment of the policy endorsement for holistic management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 50-53.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:125:y:2014:i:c:p:50-53
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X13001480
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mano, Haim & Oliver, Richard L, 1993. "Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 451-466, December.
    2. Sherren, Kate & Fischer, Joern & Fazey, Ioan, 2012. "Managing the grazing landscape: Insights for agricultural adaptation from a mid-drought photo-elicitation study in the Australian sheep-wheat belt," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 72-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carolyn Mann & Kate Sherren, 2018. "Holistic Management and Adaptive Grazing: A Trainers’ View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Behnke, Roy & Young, Helen & Sulieman, Hussein M. & Robinson, Sarah & Idris, Ammar E., 2020. "The seasonal imperative: Environmental drivers of livestock mobility in East Darfur, Sudan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Hannah Gosnell & Kerry Grimm & Bruce E. Goldstein, 2020. "A half century of Holistic Management: what does the evidence reveal?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 849-867, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bettiga, Debora & Lamberti, Lucio & Noci, Giuliano, 2017. "Do mind and body agree? Unconscious versus conscious arousal in product attitude formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 108-117.
    2. Babin, Barry J. & Griffin, Mitch, 1998. "The nature of satisfaction: An updated examination and analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 127-136, February.
    3. Friman, Margareta, 2004. "The structure of affective reactions to critical incidents," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 331-353, June.
    4. Yin, Fa-Shing & Liu, Min-Ling & Lin, Chieh-Peng, 2015. "Forecasting the continuance intention of social networking sites: Assessing privacy risk and usefulness of technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 267-272.
    5. Bradley, Gregory T. & LaFleur, Elizabeth K., 2016. "Toward the development of hedonic-utilitarian measures of retail service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 60-66.
    6. Yihan Huang & Daehwan Kim, 2023. "How Does Service Quality Improve Consumer Loyalty in Sports Fitness Centers? The Moderating Role of Sport Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, August.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4266 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Ikrame Selkani, 2018. "Festival Attractiveness Literature Review," International Journal of World Policy and Development Studies, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(9), pages 89-97, 11-2018.
    9. Tami Kim & Leslie K. John & Todd Rogers & Michael I. Norton, 2019. "Procedural Justice and the Risks of Consumer Voting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(11), pages 5234-5251, November.
    10. Machleit, Karen A. & Mantel, Susan Powell, 2001. "Emotional response and shopping satisfaction: Moderating effects of shopper attributions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 97-106, November.
    11. Mehran, Javaneh & Olya, Hossein GT., 2020. "Canal boat tourism: Application of complexity theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    12. Lin, Tung-Ching & Huang, Shiu-Li & Hsu, Chieh-Ju, 2015. "A dual-factor model of loyalty to IT product – The case of smartphones," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 215-228.
    13. Nagpal, Anish & Lei, Jing & Khare, Adwait, 2015. "To Choose or to Reject: The Effect of Decision Frame on Food Customization Decisions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 422-435.
    14. Hatice Aydýn & Cemal Zehir, 2017. "What Type Relationship Do We Have with Our Brands? Is the Name of this Relationship Brand Romance?," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 272-283.
    15. Min Hou & Zuohao Hu, 2013. "Patronage, only for happiness? ¨C An analysis on Coexistence of Multiple Consumption Emotions," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(1), pages 116-127, March.
    16. Yuan Li & William J. Kettinger, 2022. "Testing the Relationship Between Information and Knowledge in Computer-Aided Decision-Making," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1827-1843, December.
    17. Jones, Michael A. & Taylor, Valerie A., 2018. "Marketer requests for positive post-purchase satisfaction evaluations: Consumer depth interview findings," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 218-226.
    18. Shalom Levy & Israel Nebenzahl, 2008. "The influence of product involvement on consumers’ interactive processes in interactive television," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 65-77, March.
    19. Grandey, Alicia A. & Fisk, Glenda M. & Mattila, Anna S. & Jansen, Karen J. & Sideman, Lori A., 2005. "Is "service with a smile" enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 38-55, January.
    20. Fernando Oliveira Santini & Wagner Junior Ladeira & Claudio Hoffmann Sampaio & Diego Costa Pinto, 2018. "The brand experience extended model: a meta-analysis," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(6), pages 519-535, November.
    21. Wu, Cedric Hsi-Jui & Liang, Rong-Da, 2011. "The relationship between white-water rafting experience formation and customer reaction: a flow theory perspective," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 317-325.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:125:y:2014:i:c:p:50-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.