IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v10y2007iq3p139-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De l’intérêt des firmes dominantes à perturber et stabiliser le jeu concurrentiel

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Roy

    (Université de Montpellier 1)

Abstract

(VF)L’article explore une problématique émergente dans la littérature en stratégie, celle du changement des règles du jeu concurrentiel, appréhendée ici du point de vue des firmes dominantes. L’objectif poursuivi réside dans l’analyse des défis et des enjeux concrets que rencontrent les firmes aux différentes étapes d’une stratégie de perturbation. L’étude détaillée de la diffusion des multiplexes dans le secteur français des salles de cinéma illustre notre propos. Le traitement des données, articulé autour d’une triangulation des méthodes, dévoile les déterminants, les facteurs clés de succès et les implications de la perturbation introduite par la firme Pathé.(VA)This article explores an emerging research question in the strategic management field : how do some firms succeed in changing the competitive rules of the game? Our contribution lies in studying the case of dominant firms. We attempt to identify the various challenges encountered at the different stages of a disruptive strategy. The study of the diffusion of multiplexes in the sector of French movie theatres illustrates our discussion. Method triangulation provides results that concern both the causes of disruption, key success factors during the process and its implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Roy, 2007. "De l’intérêt des firmes dominantes à perturber et stabiliser le jeu concurrentiel," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 10(3), pages 139-160, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:10:y:2007:i:q3:p:139-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/rev/103160.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Bettis & Michael A. Hitt, 1995. "The new competitive landscape," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(S1), pages 7-19.
    2. Barrie R. Nault & Mark B. Vandenbosch, 1996. "Eating Your Own Lunch: Protection Through Preemption," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 342-358, June.
    3. Greg Young & Ken G. Smith & Curtis M. Grimm, 1996. "“Austrian” and Industrial Organization Perspectives on Firm-level Competitive Activity and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 243-254, June.
    4. L.G. Thomas, 1996. "The Two Faces of Competition: Dynamic Resourcefulness and the Hypercompetitive Shift," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 221-242, June.
    5. C. K. Prahalad & Gary Hamel, 1994. "Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 5-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gérard Koenig, 2008. "Une revue, des règles, un rôle dans le champ du management stratégique," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(Special), pages 7-37, June.
    2. Gérard Koenig, 2008. "Une revue, des règles, un rôle dans le champ du management stratégique," Post-Print hal-01377378, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul M. Vaaler & Gerry McNamara, 2010. "Are Technology-Intensive Industries More Dynamically Competitive? No and Yes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 271-289, February.
    2. Basu, Sandip & Phelps, Corey & Kotha, Suresh, 2011. "Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 153-171, March.
    3. Scott F. Turner & Will Mitchell & Richard A. Bettis, 2010. "Responding to Rivals and Complements: How Market Concentration Shapes Generational Product Innovation Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 854-872, August.
    4. Jose Lopez-De-Pedro & Eva Rimbau-Gilabert, 2012. "Stakeholder Approach: What Effects Should We Take into Account in Contemporary Societies?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 147-158, May.
    5. Faouzi Bensebaa, 2003. "La dynamique concurrentielle:défis analytiques et méthodologiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(1), pages 5-37, March.
    6. Yu-Shan Chen & Ke-Chiun Chang, 2009. "Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 637-655, September.
    7. David G. Sirmon & Michael A. Hitt, 2003. "Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(4), pages 339-358, October.
    8. Conti, Claudio Ramos & Parente, Ronaldo & de Vasconcelos, Flávio C., 2016. "When distance does not matter: Implications for Latin American multinationals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1980-1992.
    9. Cannavale, Chiara & Esempio, Anna & Ferretti, Marco, 2021. "Up- and down- alliances: A systematic literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    10. Rajdeep Grewal & Murali Chandrashekaran & F. Robert Dwyer, 2008. "Navigating Local Environments with Global Strategies: A Contingency Model of Multinational Subsidiary Performance," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 886-902, 09-10.
    11. Short, Jeremy C. & Palmer, Timothy B., 2003. "Organizational performance referents: An empirical examination of their content and influences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 209-224, March.
    12. A. George Assaf & Alexander Josiassen & Haemoon Oh, 2016. "Internationalization and hotel performance," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(3), pages 572-592, June.
    13. M Ashraf Al Haq & Norazlina Abd Wahab & Md. Mahmudul Alam, 2021. "Understanding The Impact Of Institutional Factors On Asnaf Sustainability: A Pls-Sem Approach," Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, Bank Indonesia, vol. 7(4), pages 759-790, November.
    14. Vishal K. Gupta & Suman Niranjan & Banu A. Goktan & John Eriskon, 2016. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation role in shaping reactions to new technologies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 935-961, December.
    15. Yu-Shan Chen & Ke-Chiun Chang, 2010. "The nonlinear nature of the relationships between the patent traits and corporate performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(1), pages 201-210, January.
    16. Ilona Baumane & Rebekka Vedina, 2011. "Capacities and Competencies as Sources of Competitive Advantage: The Case Study of Latvian Hotels," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(2), pages 301-318, May.
    17. Stine Labes & Nicolai Hanner & Ruediger Zarnekow, 2017. "Successful Business Model Types of Cloud Providers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 223-233, August.
    18. Rajat Mishra & Randy Napier & Mahmut Yasar, 2019. "Do competitors respond to capacity changes? Evidence from U.S. manufacturers," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 159-172, December.
    19. Palash Deb & Parthiban David & Jonathan O'Brien, 2017. "When is cash good or bad for firm performance?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 436-454, February.
    20. Zhao, Shukuan & Xu, Baoda & Zhang, Weiyong, 2018. "Government R&D subsidy policy in China: An empirical examination of effect, priority, and specifics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 75-82.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dynamique concurrentielle; stratégie de perturbation; firmes dominantes; competitive dynamics; disruptive strategy; dominant firms.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:10:y:2007:i:q3:p:139-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.