IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2017i3p140-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing Tax Avoidance by Using Conservatism Accounting through Book Tax Differences. Case Study in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Heni PURWANTINI

    (Malang Merdeka University, Indonesia)

  • Grahita CHANDRARIN

    (Malang Merdeka University, Indonesia)

  • Prihat ASSIH

    (Malang Merdeka University, Indonesia)

Abstract

The research’s first purpose is to analyze directly conservatism accounting influence towards book tax differences and tax avoidance. The second pusrpose is to analyze indirect influence of towards tax avoidance through book tax differences. The research is conducted to companies enlisted in Indonesian Stock Exchange and belongs to LQ45 during 2013 to 2015. The number of companies sample taken by purposive sampling is 23 corporations, therefore total observation is 69 observations. The acquired data analysed by path analysis. This research conclude that conservatism accounting practice significantly influence book tax difference practice but did not influence tax avoidance. Conservatism accounting practice is also has no influence towards tax avoidance committed by book tax differences. This book tax difference is only significantly influential to commit tax avoidance. This research can contribute in taxation field as input in tax planning formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Heni PURWANTINI & Grahita CHANDRARIN & Prihat ASSIH, 2017. "Minimizing Tax Avoidance by Using Conservatism Accounting through Book Tax Differences. Case Study in Indonesia," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 140-147.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2017:i:3:p:140-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2017_3/Purwantini_Chandrarin_Assih.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Plesko, George A., 2004. "Corporate Tax Avoidance and the Properties of Corporate Earnings," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 57(3), pages 729-737, September.
    2. Maurizio Bovi, 2005. "Book-Tax Gap. An Income Horse Race," Public Economics 0506009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Abdul Wahab, Nor Shaipah & Holland, Kevin, 2015. "The persistence of book-tax differences," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 339-350.
    4. Rakia Riguen Koubaa & Anis Jarboui, 2017. "Normal, Abnormal Book-Tax Differences and Accounting Conservatism," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 13(1), pages 113-142.
    5. Hanlon, Michelle & Heitzman, Shane, 2010. "A review of tax research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 127-178, December.
    6. Basu, Sudipta, 1997. "The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 3-37, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joshua Aronmwan, Edosa & Okafor, Chinwuba, 2019. "Corporate Tax Avoidance: Review Of Measures And Prospects," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 8(2), pages 21-42, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heni Purwantini, 2017. "Minimizing Tax Avoidance by Using Conservatism Accounting Through Book Tax Differences:Case Study in Indonesia," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 6(5), pages 55-67, September.
    2. Luca Menicacci, 2022. "Financial reporting and book-tax conformity: A review of the issues," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 41-77.
    3. Anna Görlitz & Michael Dobler, 2023. "Financial accounting for deferred taxes: a systematic review of empirical evidence," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 113-165, February.
    4. Luo, Bing, 2019. "Effects of auditor-provided tax services on book-tax differences and on investors' mispricing of book-tax differences," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    5. Wiem Dridi & Boubaker Adel, 2016. "Book-Tax Differences and the Persistence of Earnings and Accruals: Tunisian Evidence," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 193-193, June.
    6. Petro Lisowsky & Leslie Robinson & Andrew Schmidt, 2013. "Do Publicly Disclosed Tax Reserves Tell Us About Privately Disclosed Tax Shelter Activity?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 583-629, June.
    7. Konda, Laura & Patel, Elena & Seegert, Nathan, 2022. "Tax enforcement and the intended and unintended consequences of information disclosure," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Bornemann, Tobias, 2018. "Tax avoidance and accounting conservatism," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 232, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    9. Chyz, James A., 2013. "Personally tax aggressive executives and corporate tax sheltering," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 311-328.
    10. Tang, Tanya & Firth, Michael, 2011. "Can book-tax differences capture earnings management and tax Management? Empirical evidence from China," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 175-204, June.
    11. Song, Qian & Holland, Kevin, 2023. "The quality of tax accounting for financial reporting purposes: International evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Nor Shaipah Abdul Wahab, 2016. "Malaysian multinational companies (MNC): Permanent and temporary nature of tax planning," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1248644-124, December.
    13. Frey, Lisa & Engelhard, Lisa, 2017. "Review on tax research in accounting: Is the information given by U.S. GAAP income taxes also provided by IFRS?," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe B-28-17, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    14. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    15. Frey, Lisa & Möller, Manuela, 2015. "Der Zusammenhang zwischen „book-tax differences“ und Bilanzpolitik zum Erreichen eines positiven Jahresergebnisses," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(4), pages 467-500.
    16. Stevanie S. Neuman & Thomas C. Omer & Andrew P. Schmidt, 2020. "Assessing Tax Risk: Practitioner Perspectives," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1788-1827, September.
    17. Barbara Su, 2023. "Banking practices and borrowing firms’ financial reporting quality: evidence from bank cross-selling," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 201-236, March.
    18. Ji Seon Yoo & Ye Ji Lee, 2019. "National Culture and Tax Avoidance of Multinational Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.
    19. Manganaris, Panayotis & Beccalli, Elena & Dimitropoulos, Panagiotis, 2017. "Bank transparency and the crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 121-137.
    20. Bo-Hung Chiou & Shen-Ho Chang, 2020. "Influence of Investment Efficiency by Managers and Accounting Conservatism on Idiosyncratic Risks to Investors," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2017:i:3:p:140-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.