IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/inorps/v6y2013i03p193-205_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professionalizing Diversity and Inclusion Practice: Should Voluntary Standards Be the Chicken or the Egg?

Author

Listed:
  • Hays-Thomas, Rosemary
  • Bendick, Marc

Abstract

Workplace diversity and inclusion (D & I) practices today are based to a great extent on unevaluated experience and intuition rather than empirical evidence. Would voluntary professional practice standards in this field help to raise the level of current and future practice? Or would they be premature? If developed under 4 principles we describe, we predict the former. However, this positive outcome will also require industrial and organizational (I–O) psychologists to join their D & I colleagues in expanding research on D & I practices, strengthening the skills of D & I practitioners, assisting employers to avoid self-incrimination, and enhancing employer commitment to D & I itself. I–O psychologists should also be aware of other implications of D & I practice standards for their work.

Suggested Citation

  • Hays-Thomas, Rosemary & Bendick, Marc, 2013. "Professionalizing Diversity and Inclusion Practice: Should Voluntary Standards Be the Chicken or the Egg?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 193-205, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:6:y:2013:i:03:p:193-205_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942600005253/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nair, Nisha & Vohra, Neharika, 2015. "Diversity and Inclusion at the Workplace: A Review of Research and Perspectives," IIMA Working Papers WP2015-03-34, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    2. Willard, Greg & Isaac, Kyonne-Joy & Carney, Dana R., 2015. "Some evidence for the nonverbal contagion of racial bias," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 96-107.
    3. Shalini Garg & Snehlata Sangwan, 2021. "Literature Review on Diversity and Inclusion at Workplace, 2010–2017," Vision, , vol. 25(1), pages 12-22, March.
    4. Harald Conrad & Hendrik Meyer-Ohle, 2022. "Training Regimes and Diversity: Experiences of Young Foreign Employees in Japanese Headquarters," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(2), pages 199-216, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:inorps:v:6:y:2013:i:03:p:193-205_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/iop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.