IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buhurj/v2y2017i02p195-224_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business Enterprises §

Author

Listed:
  • McCORQUODALE, Robert
  • SMIT, Lise
  • NEELY, Stuart
  • BROOKS, Robin

Abstract

This article considers the practices of companies worldwide in attempting to implement human rights due diligence (HRDD) as envisaged by the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Based on empirical research conducted through surveys and interviews, it analyses corporate practices in this area. It examines the responses of companies with reference to the core elements of implementing HRDD: identifying actual or potential human rights impacts; taking action to address these impacts; and tracking or monitoring the effectiveness of actions. In addition, the article places these practices in the context of the legal developments in the field of HRDD. The research shows the difference that dedicated HRDD – in comparison with non-human rights specific processes – can make in terms of identifying adverse human rights impacts of both the company as well as of those which are part of its business relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • McCORQUODALE, Robert & SMIT, Lise & NEELY, Stuart & BROOKS, Robin, 2017. "Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business Enterprises §," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 195-224, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:2:y:2017:i:02:p:195-224_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2057019817000025/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Čertanec, 2019. "The Connection between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Respect for Human Rights," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 2, pages 103-127, June.
    2. Marisa McVey & John Ferguson & François-Régis Puyou, 2023. "“Traduttore, Traditore?” Translating Human Rights into the Corporate Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 573-596, January.
    3. Rogerson, Michael & Scarpa, Francesco & Snelson-Powell, Annie, 2024. "Accounting for human rights: Evidence of due diligence in EU-listed firms’ reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Magda B. L. Donia & Salvador Herencia Carrasco & Sara Seck & Robert McCorquodale & Sigalit Ronen, 2020. "The Theorized Relationship between Organizational (Non)Compliance with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Human Rights and Desired Employee Workplace Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Anne TREBILCOCK, 2020. "The Rana Plaza disaster seven years on: Transnational experiments and perhaps a new treaty?," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(4), pages 545-568, December.
    6. Wettstein, Florian & Giuliani, Elisa & Santangelo, Grazia D. & Stahl, Günter K., 2019. "International business and human rights: A research agenda," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 54-65.
    7. Elif Oral, 2024. "The environmental rule of law and the protection of human rights defenders: law, society, technology, and markets," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 393-421, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buhurj:v:2:y:2017:i:02:p:195-224_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/bhj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.