IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpn/umkeip/v18y2019i4p425-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax policy in OECD countries in 2007–2016: trends and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Ryta Dziemianowicz

    (University of Bialystok)

Abstract

Motivation: Taxation patterns vary from country to country. The shape of the tax policy was influenced by historical conditions, as well as changes in macroeconomic conditions. An example of this is the recent crisis, during which the measures taken in the area of discretionary tax policy often proved to be a good response to the problems of the economies and facilitated a faster return to the path of growth. At the same time, dur-ing the last century, the perception of the role of taxes in economic devel-opment changed radically, moving from a legitimate tool used by the state in the development process after World War II, through treating taxes as a ‘necessary evil’ at the turn of the century, to an instrument conditioning the maintenance of fiscal balance. Aim: The purpose of this article is to analyze the tax policies implemented in OECD countries, indicate similari-ties and differences in response to global conditions and identify general trends in the reform of tax systems. The analysis covered OECD countries in 2008–2017. The study utilizes the descriptive method with elements of statistical data analysis. The article was prepared on the basis of literature studies and OECD data. Results: Economic globalization has changed the dynamics of the legislation process and influenced decision making in the field of tax policy. Although decisions are still made by state parliaments, they not only reflect the needs of the budget, but also ensure the interna-tional competitiveness of the tax system and protect against fiscal erosion. It should be remembered, however, that the tax system is defined as a so-cial agreement of sorts, which is concluded between the government and the society. The level and structure of taxation determine the specific ‘so-cial balance’ achieved between the conflicting interests represented by the two parties to the agreement. This balance should not be disturbed solely in order to cover unitary shortfalls in public revenue in a given year.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryta Dziemianowicz, 2019. "Tax policy in OECD countries in 2007–2016: trends and challenges," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 18(4), pages 425-440, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpn:umkeip:v:18:y:2019:i:4:p:425-440
    DOI: 10.12775/EiP.2019.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2019.028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12775/EiP.2019.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burgess, Robin & Stern, Nicholas, 1993. "Taxation and Development," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 762-830, June.
    2. Vito Tanzi, 2010. "Tax Systems in the OECD: Recent Evolution, Competition and Convergence," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1012, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    3. Richard M. Bird & J. Scott Wilkie, 2012. "Designing Tax Policy: Constraints and Objectives in an Open Economy," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1224, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graziella Bertocchi, 2011. "The Vanishing Bequest Tax: The Comparative Evolution Of Bequest Taxation In Historical Perspective," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 107-131, March.
    2. António Afonso & Ana Patricia Montes & José M. Domínguez, 2024. "Measuring Tax Burden Efficiency in OECD Countries: An International Comparison," CESifo Working Paper Series 11333, CESifo.
    3. De Bonis, Valeria, 1997. "Regional integration and factor income taxation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1849, The World Bank.
    4. Emmanuel Eneche Onoja & Ademu Usman Odoma, 2021. "Assessing the Effect of Tax Administration on Smes Tax Compliance Level in Kogi State," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, July -Dec.
    5. Gustavo Marrero, 2010. "Tax-mix, public spending composition and growth," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 29-51, February.
    6. Benjamin A. Olken & Monica Singhal, 2011. "Informal Taxation," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Godin, M. & Hindriks, J., 2015. "A Review of Critical Issues on Tax Design and Tax Administration in a Global Economy and Developing Countries," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015028, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    8. Tamilina, Larysa, 2016. "Особливості Механізму Оподаткування Державної Промисловості На Новому Етапі Розвитку Економіки (1930 – 1931) [Specificities of industrial taxation in the 1930 – 1931]," MPRA Paper 96504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Mirco Tonin, 2014. "Reporting import tariffs (and other taxes)," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 21(1), pages 153-173, February.
    10. Tirachini, Alejandro & Proost, Stef, 2021. "Transport taxes and subsidies in developing countries: The effect of income inequality aversion," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    11. Céline DE QUATREBARBES & Luc SAVARD & Dorothée BOCCANFUSO, 2011. "Can the removal of VAT Exemptions support the Poor? The Case of Niger," Working Papers 201106, CERDI.
    12. Bourguignon, Francois & Rogers, F. Halsey, 2007. "Distributional effects of educational improvements: Are we using the wrong model?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 735-746, December.
    13. Emran, M. Shahe & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2005. "On selective indirect tax reform in developing countries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 599-623, April.
    14. von Soest, Christian, 2006. "Measuring the Capability to Raise Revenue: Process and Output Dimensions and Their Application to the Zambia Revenue Authority," GIGA Working Papers 35, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    15. Gersbach, Hans & Siemers, Lars-H. R., 2010. "Land Reforms And Economic Development," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 527-547, September.
    16. Alou Adessé Dama, 2021. "Exploring Tilly’s Theory : Violent Conflicts and Tax Revenue in Sub-Saharan Africa," CERDI Working papers hal-03401539, HAL.
    17. Tamilina, Larysa, 2014. "Податкова Політика Періоду Непу Та Індустріалізації [The politics of taxation in Ukraine during the new economic policy and industrialization]," MPRA Paper 96497, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Bachas, Pierre & Gadenne, Lucie & Jensen, Anders, 2020. "Informality, Consumption Taxes and Redistribution," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1277, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    19. M. Govinda Rao & R. Kavita Rao, 2005. "Trends and Issues in Tax Policy and Reform in India," India Policy Forum, Global Economy and Development Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 2(1), pages 55-122.
    20. Camelia, MORARU & Roxana, IONIŢĂ, 2014. "The Influence Of Taxation On Economic Growth. Econometric Evidence From Romania," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 26(4), pages 284-290.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax policy; tax system; theory taxation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpn:umkeip:v:18:y:2019:i:4:p:425-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Miroslawa Buczynska (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.wydawnictwoumk.pl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.