IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v8y2020i4p103-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Division of Labour, Work–Life Conflict and Family Policy: Conclusions and Reflections

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ochsner

    (FORS—Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences, University of Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Ivett Szalma

    (Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Hungary / Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary)

  • Judit Takács

    (Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Hungary / KWI Essen—Kulturwissenschaftliches Institut, Germany)

Abstract

This thematic issue aims to shed light on different facets of the relationship between division of labour within families and couples, work–life conflict and family policy. In this afterword, we provide a summary of the contributions by emphasizing three main aspects in need of further scrutiny: the conceptualisation of labour division within families and couples, the multilevel structure of relationships and the interactions of gender(ed) values at different levels of exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ochsner & Ivett Szalma & Judit Takács, 2020. "Division of Labour, Work–Life Conflict and Family Policy: Conclusions and Reflections," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 103-109.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v8:y:2020:i:4:p:103-109
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i4.3620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3620
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v8i4.3620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v8:y:2020:i:4:p:103-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.