IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v2y2014i3p102-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complaints as Opportunity for Change in Encounters between Youths and Police Officers

Author

Listed:
  • Tove Pettersson

    (Department of Criminology, Stockholm University, Sweden)

Abstract

The presence of distrust in the police and how they perform their work among ethnic minority youths in socially underprivileged areas is well established. Experiences of, or beliefs about, unfair treatment from the police can be viewed both as an indicator and a consequence of exclusion. It is well-known that negative experiences of the police are more significant for trust in the police and their legitimacy than positive ones, with some even suggesting that positive experiences do not matter at all. However, from a procedural justice perspective it has been suggested that some positive experience do matter, particularly if the police are considered to perform their work in line with procedural fairness. On the basis of a participant observation study, this article discusses situations in which youths express complaints about the police in different ways. In response to such situations, the police can act in both exclusionary and inclusive ways. It is argued that youths’ complaints can be used as an opportunity for change if the police treat the youths concerned with fairness and in inclusive rather than exclusionary ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Tove Pettersson, 2014. "Complaints as Opportunity for Change in Encounters between Youths and Police Officers," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 102-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v2:y:2014:i:3:p:102-112
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v2i3.44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/44
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v2i3.44?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v2:y:2014:i:3:p:102-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.