IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v4y2016i3p176-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Still ‘Watching’ TV? The Consumption of TV Fiction by Engaged Audiences

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Dhoest

    (Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Nele Simons

    (Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

There is no denying that television, as a medium and an institution, has drastically changed in the age of digitization and convergence. For audiences, this has not only opened up multiple opportunities to watch television content at other times and on other devices, but also to interact with its cross-media extensions. However, while much has been written about the new opportunities for audience engagement, we do not know much about the actual adoption of new technologies nor the motivations underlying such uses. Therefore, this paper draws on empirical audience research to address the key question: how do viewers engage with contemporary TV fiction? Through empirical audience research, using various qualitative research methods, three different aspects of the reception of cross-media TV fiction will be discussed: (1) how do viewers watch the TV episodes of contemporary TV fiction?, (2) how do viewers engage with the cross-media extensions of TV fiction?, and (3) how do viewers experience the social dimensions of contemporary TV fiction? We focus on a particular group, that of 'engaged' viewers, who are actively involved by personalizing their viewing practices, by communicating about it, by consuming cross-media elements of TV fiction, or producing TV fiction-related content. Our findings suggest that even this group does not make full use of all the available technological opportunities to personalize TV viewing, and that the classical TV text, linear viewing, and the social aspect of viewing remain of key importance.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Dhoest & Nele Simons, 2016. "Still ‘Watching’ TV? The Consumption of TV Fiction by Engaged Audiences," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 176-184.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v4:y:2016:i:3:p:176-184
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v4i3.427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/427
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v4i3.427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amanda D. Lotz, 2009. "What Is U.S. Television Now?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 625(1), pages 49-59, September.
    2. Srinivas K. Reddy & Jay E. Aronson & Antonie Stam, 1998. "SPOT: Scheduling Programs Optimally for Television," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 83-102, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bollapragada, Srinivas & Bussieck, Michael & Mallik, Suman, 2002. "Scheduling Commercial Videotapes in Broadcast Television," Working Papers 02-0127, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    2. Danaher, Peter J. & Dagger, Tracey S. & Smith, Michael S., 2011. "Forecasting television ratings," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1215-1240, October.
    3. Giovanni Giallombardo & Houyuan Jiang & Giovanna Miglionico, 2016. "New Formulations for the Conflict Resolution Problem in the Scheduling of Television Commercials," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 838-848, August.
    4. M J Brusco, 2008. "Scheduling advertising slots for television," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(10), pages 1363-1372, October.
    5. Eliashberg, Jehoshua & Hegie, Quintus & Ho, Jason & Huisman, Dennis & Miller, Steven J. & Swami, Sanjeev & Weinberg, Charles B. & Wierenga, Berend, 2009. "Demand-driven scheduling of movies in a multiplex," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 75-88.
    6. Daya Ram Gaur & Ramesh Krishnamurti & Rajeev Kohli, 2009. "Conflict Resolution in the Scheduling of Television Commercials," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1098-1105, October.
    7. Shinjini Pandey & Goutam Dutta & Harit Joshi, 2017. "Survey on Revenue Management in Media and Broadcasting," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 195-213, June.
    8. Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico & Houyuan Jiang, 2015. "New Reformulations for the Conflict Resolution Problem in the Scheduling of Television Commercials," Working Papers 2015/03, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    9. Bragge, Johanna, 2001. "Premediation analysis of the energy taxation dispute in Finland," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Denny Meyer & Rob J. Hyndman, 2005. "Rating Forecasts for Television Programs," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 1/05, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    11. Srinivas Bollapragada & Michael R. Bussieck & Suman Mallik, 2004. "Scheduling Commercial Videotapes in Broadcast Television," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 679-689, October.
    12. Srinivas Bollapragada & Marc Garbiras, 2004. "Scheduling Commercials on Broadcast Television," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 337-345, June.
    13. Gaurav Sabnis & Rajdeep Grewal, 2015. "Cable News Wars on the Internet: Competition and User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 301-319, June.
    14. José Antonio Carbajal & Wes Chaar, 2017. "Turner Optimizes the Allocation of Audience Deficiency Units," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 518-536, December.
    15. José Antonio Carbajal & Peter Williams & Andreea Popescu & Wes Chaar, 2019. "Turner Blazes a Trail for Audience Targeting on Television with Operations Research and Advanced Analytics," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 64-89, January.
    16. Alexander Dhoest & Nele Simons, 2016. "Still ‘Watching’ TV? The Consumption of TV Fiction by Engaged Audiences," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 176-184.
    17. I. Robert Chiang & Jhih‐Hua Jhang‐Li, 2020. "Competition through Exclusivity in Digital Content Distribution," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(5), pages 1270-1286, May.
    18. Sanjeev Swami & Martin L. Puterman & Charles B. Weinberg, 2001. "Play It Again, Sam? Optimal Replacement Policies for a Motion Picture Exhibitor," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 369-386, July.
    19. Elsie Sterbin Gottlieb, 2002. "Solving generalized transportation problems via pure transportation problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(7), pages 666-685, October.
    20. Lothar Mikos, 2016. "Digital Media Platforms and the Use of TV Content: Binge Watching and Video-on-Demand in Germany," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 154-161.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v4:y:2016:i:3:p:176-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.