IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ccs/journl/y2018id267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalization does not End, it Becomes Another

Author

Listed:
  • Boris A. Kheyfets

Abstract

The article considers the features of a new stage of globalization. The slowdown in the dynamics of interstate flows of physical assets, primarily foreign trade and capital in the post-crisis period, sparked a discussion about the end of globalization. It is shown that the slowing down of globalization processes is temporary, it concerns traditional assets, while the interstate flows of new assets triggered by the 4th industrial revolution are fundamentally strengthened. The driver of a new phase of globalization are the technologies associated with the Internet, new communications, 3D-printing, robotization, renewable energy, etc. They fundamentally change the view of the rational allocation of production and reduce the need for transportation of traditional goods and for foreign investment. As a result, in the future may occur reformatting of some existing value chains. New technologies also change the business strategy, which begins to create special technological platforms that eliminate intermediaries and ensure better and more competitive satisfaction of customers’ demands. The increased tendencies towards regionalization and transregionalization, which stimulate all states to remove barriers to trade and investment and improve the investment climate, is not an obstacle to globalization. In the future, their expansion will take place at the expense of new members, the conclusion of preferential trade and investment agreements between members and non-members of individual mega-partnerships. Another driver of the current stage of globalization is informal consumer globalization, or “globalization from below,†which is connected with the activity of citizens. The number of foreign tourist trips, studying and working abroad, and purchases abroad via the Internet is growing. This is a fundamentally new stage of globalization, which will be gradually formed a world without economic borders, common economic space without participation of supranational formal institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris A. Kheyfets, 2018. "Globalization does not End, it Becomes Another," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 11(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2018:id:267
    DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-1-14-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/viewFile/267/267
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-1-14-33?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer & Shujiro Urata & Fan Zhai, 2017. "Going It Alone in the Asia-Pacific: Regional Trade Agreements Without the United States," Working Paper Series WP17-10, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. A. Kheyfets, 2019. "Eurasian Economic Union - Time for Modernization," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 12(2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimos Chatzinikolaou & Charis Michael Vlados, 2024. "New Globalization and Energy Transition: Insights from Recent Global Developments," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Takatoshi Ito & Kazumasa Iwata & Colin McKenzie & Shujiro Urata, 2018. "Did Abenomics Succeed?: Editors' Overview," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Kamal Halili Hassan & Muhammad Faliq Abd Razak & Rohaida Nordin & Rohani Abdul Rahim, 2018. "Malaysia with the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Aftermath of the United States Withdrawal From the TPPA," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(10), pages 868-880, October.
    4. Banga, Rashmi, 2019. "CPTPP: Implications for Malaysia’s Merchandise Trade Balance," MPRA Paper 93254, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. A. Kuznetsov V. & А. Кузнецов В., 2018. "Интеграционные процессы в АТР с участием Китая и позиция России // Integration Processes in the asia-Pacific Region with the Participation of China and the Position of Russia," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(6), pages 95-105.
    6. Shepherd, Ben, 2019. "Mega-regional trade agreements and Asia: An application of structural gravity to goods, services, and value chains," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 32-42.
    7. Peter A. Petri & Michael G. Plummer, 2020. "Should China Join the New Trans‐Pacific Partnership?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(2), pages 18-36, March.
    8. Kikuchi, Tomoo & Yanagida, Kensuke & Vo, Huong, 2018. "The effects of Mega-Regional Trade Agreements on Vietnam," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 4-19.
    9. Mikio Kuwayama, 2019. "TPP11 (CPTPP): Its Implications for Japan-Latin America Trade Relations in Times of Uncertainty," Discussion Paper Series DP2019-05, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    10. Michael J. Ferrantino & Maryla Maliszewska & Svitlana Taran, 2019. "Actual and Potential Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific," World Bank Publications - Reports 33549, The World Bank Group.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ccs:journl:y:2018:id:267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кривопалов Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐ¹ Ð Ð»ÐµÐºÑ ÐµÐµÐ²Ð¸Ñ‡ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.