IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2020v2p58-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impactof External Public Auditon Public Administration Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • CATALIN FLORIN ZETI

    (LUCIAN BLAGA UNIVERSITY OF SIBIU)

  • MIHAELA LUCA

    (LUCIAN BLAGA UNIVERSITY OF SIBIU)

  • CRISTINA PIRVU

    (AJPIS VALCEA)

Abstract

The control of governmental expenditure is one of the main traits of democratic systems. Similarly, the supreme state audit has been around for centuries, in most European states, which have established mechanisms to ensure accountability for the management of public expenditure, as well as to guarantee their transparency and supervision. Public audit focuses on the formation and use of public funds, being an integral part of good governance. It has a wide range of manifestation, covering all areas of the public sector, each of them being analyzed from at least two perspectives: the financial effort of the public sector to carry out the activities and the impact of these activities that are useful to society. The study of the norms elaborated at international level and the experience of advanced European states offers a comprehensive perspective on public auditfrom a conceptual point of view within the current European contextand helps us highlight the role of audit in restoring public confidence in the quality of the financial reporting system. Moreover, public audit plays a decisive role in increasing efficiency and transparency in the management of public resources and in reducing corruption. The impact of the external public audit activity of the Romanian Court of Accounts on the correct and effective management of public financial resourcescan be highlighted as a whole, using the data from the audit reports published by the institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalin Florin Zeti & Mihaela Luca & Cristina Pirvu, 2020. "The Impactof External Public Auditon Public Administration Efficiency," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 58-66, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:2:p:58-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2020-02/08_Zeti.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blume, Lorenz & Voigt, Stefan, 2011. "Does organizational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 215-229, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanda Mihai-Razvan & Militaru Elian-Gabriel, 2023. "European Supreme Audit Institutions: The Constitutional And Legal Coordinates Of Diagonal Public Accountability," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 105-119, October.
    2. Sułkowski, Łukasz & Dobrowolski, Zbysław, 2021. "The role of supreme audit institutions in energy accountability in EU countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Lino, André Feliciano & Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha de & Aquino, André Carlos Busanelli de & Steccolini, Ileana, 2022. "Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Choudhury, Sanchari, 2019. "WTO membership and corruption," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Reichborn-Kjennerud, Kristin & González-Díaz, Belén & Bracci, Enrico & Carrington, Thomas & Hathaway, James & Jeppesen, Kim Klarskov & Steccolini, Ileana, 2019. "Sais work against corruption in Scandinavian, South-European and African countries: An institutional analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    6. Kenneth W. Abbott & Philipp Genschel & Duncan Snidal & Bernhard Zangl, 2020. "Competence versus control: The governor's dilemma," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 619-636, October.
    7. Voigt, Stefan, 2012. "On the optimal number of courts," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 49-62.
    8. Rajat Deb, 2018. "Financial Audit or Forensic Audit? Government Sector Panorama," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 11(2), pages 135-158, December.
    9. Zbyslaw Dobrowolski, 2021. "Are the Supreme Audit Institutions Agile? A Cognitive Orientation and Agility Measures," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 52-62.
    10. Zbyslaw Dobrowolski, 2021. "Principles of Entrepreneurship Auditing: A Framework for Understanding Audit Efficacy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 145-157.
    11. Nagy, Sándor, 2012. "The role of Supreme Audit Institutions in fight against the consequences of financial and economic crisis: A theoretical approach," MPRA Paper 40356, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Mark Bovens & Anchrit Wille, 2021. "Indexing watchdog accountability powers a framework for assessing the accountability capacity of independent oversight institutions," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 856-876, July.
    13. Serhii Bardash, 2022. "Improvement of State Financial Control: Praxeological Approach," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 38-45, September.
    14. Huseyin Cicek & Suleyman Dikmen, 2021. "External Audit And Fiscal Transparency: An Empirical Analysis," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 5, pages 7-26.
    15. Wei, Shuping & Jiang, Fangxin & Pan, Jiawei & Cai, Qihai, 2023. "Financial innovation, government auditing and corporate high-quality development: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PD).
    16. Cîmpan Marius & Pacuraru-Ionescu Catalin-Paul & Borlea Sorin Nicolae & Jansen Adela, 2023. "Connections between the Model of the Supreme Public Audit Institution and Some Economic, Social, Political, and Cultural Variables," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 2036-2052, July.
    17. Jan Fałkowski & Katarzyna Metelska-Szaniawska, 2015. "Przyczyny ustanawiania i stabilność konstytucji państwa - perspektywa ekonomiczna," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 79-105.
    18. Ionel Bostan & Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Raluca Irina Clipa & Ionela Corina Chersan & Flavian Clipa, 2021. "Supreme Audit Institutions and Sustainability of Public Finance. Links and Evidence along the Economic Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Sergiy Bardash & Tatiana Osadcha, 2020. "Current Status Of State Financial Control Of Ukraine And Ways Of Its Improvement," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(2).
    20. Goel, Rajeev K. & Nelson, Michael A. & Naretta, Michael A., 2012. "The internet as an indicator of corruption awareness," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 64-75.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2020:v:2:p:58-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.