IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-07422020623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Status Of State Financial Control Of Ukraine And Ways Of Its Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Sergiy Bardash

    (National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine)

  • Tatiana Osadcha

    (Kherson State University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The urgency of the research is conditioned by the crisis of state financial control in Ukraine, in particular by the artificial lowering of the role of the state financial control for public administration in terms of determining the problems and prospects of the socio-economic development of the country. The study is evaluating the results of control measures conducted by the State Audit Service of Ukraine and the Accounting Chamber of Ukraine, development of recommendations for their improvement and phrasing. The methodological framework of the research is a comparative analysis of the series of dynamics of the established financial violations, systematic analysis of the quantitative and qualitative composition of the revealed violations, cause-and-effect analysis of the dynamics of the revealed financial violations, abstract-logical method, synthesis and generalization to substantiate the basic theoretical provisions, formulation of conclusions. The scientific results. Based on the performance evaluation of state financial control the article proves the failure of contemporary inquiries to support the interests of the state and civil society, defines the main reasons of such inconsistency. It is also determined that the significant improvement of the situation can be achieved through: awareness of the importance of the parliament and government of state control as an exclusive functionality tool of information source for nationwide scale management decisions centers about the actual situation in the national economy; accomplishment of the concept of preventive controls to facilitate optimization controls, saving budget funds for their implementation and state control servicing, establishment of the necessary evidence for further damages compensation to the state and reduction of the number and volume of financial misconducts in the future; centralization of state financial control, which will consolidate efforts to control completeness of formation, legitimacy, appropriateness and distribution efficiency, redistribution and use of financial resources of the state, eliminate duplication of control tools, create a single database of control tools and their results, optimize servicing costs of state financial control bodies. The practical significance of the research is to develop first-priority recommendations for improving the organizational foundations of state financial control and methods of conducting control measures. Significance/originality. The results obtained form an integrated view of the consequences of functioning of the state financial control bodies, the level of legal consciousness, professional competence and responsibility of officials of state authorities, local self-government, and other entities of economic relations for the consequences of managing state financial resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergiy Bardash & Tatiana Osadcha, 2020. "Current Status Of State Financial Control Of Ukraine And Ways Of Its Improvement," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2020:6:2:3
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-2-17-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/797/852
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/797
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-2-17-24?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blume, Lorenz & Voigt, Stefan, 2011. "Does organizational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 215-229, June.
    2. Hetherington, Marc J., 1998. "The Political Relevance of Political Trust," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 92(4), pages 791-808, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serhii Bardash, 2022. "Improvement of State Financial Control: Praxeological Approach," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 38-45, September.
    2. Sergiy Bardash & Tatiana Osadcha, 2021. "Substantiation Of Theoretical Fundamentals Of Social Control In The Sphere Of Economic Management," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serhii Bardash, 2022. "Improvement of State Financial Control: Praxeological Approach," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 38-45, September.
    2. Collewet, Marion & Fairley, Kim & Kessels, Roselinde & Knoef, Marike & van Vliet, Olaf, 2024. "The design of welfare: unraveling taxpayers' preferences," OSF Preprints 4am7e, Center for Open Science.
    3. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2021. "Can Political Trust Weaken the Relationship between Perceived Environmental Threats and Perceived Nuclear Threats? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Marija Džunić & Nataša Golubović & Srđan Marinković, 2020. "Determinants Of Institutional Trust In Transition Economies: Lessons From Serbia," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(225), pages 135-162, April – J.
    5. Luis Guirola & Gonzalo Rivero, 2022. "Polarization contaminates the link with partisan and independent institutions: evidence from 138 cabinet shifts," Working Papers 2237, Banco de España.
    6. Yann Algan & Pierre Cahuc & Marc Sangnier, 2016. "Trust and the Welfare State: the Twin Peaks Curve," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(593), pages 861-883, June.
    7. Timothy Besley & Sacha Dray, 2022. "Trust as state capacity: The political economy of compliance," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Finkel, Steve E. & Sabatini, Christopher A. & Bevis, Gwendolyn G., 2000. "Civic Education, Civil Society, and Political Mistrust in a Developing Democracy: The Case of the Dominican Republic," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 1851-1874, November.
    9. Stéfanie André, 2014. "Does Trust Mean the Same for Migrants and Natives? Testing Measurement Models of Political Trust with Multi-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 963-982, February.
    10. Nunkoo, Robin & Smith, Stephen L.J., 2013. "Political economy of tourism: Trust in government actors, political support, and their determinants," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 120-132.
    11. Jae Young Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2020. "Examining the Moderation Effect of Political Trust on the Linkage between Civic Morality and Support for Environmental Taxation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Costa-Font, Joan & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2023. "Health System Trust and Compliance with COVID-19 Restrictions," IZA Discussion Papers 15961, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Jae-Young Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2022. "Political Trust and Support for a Tax Increase for Social Welfare: The Role of Perceived Tax Burden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    14. Nicholas Charron & Niklas Harring & Victor Lapuente, 2021. "Trust, regulation, and redistribution why some governments overregulate and under‐redistribute," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 3-16, January.
    15. Suk Kyoung Kim & Min Jae Park & Jae Jeung Rho, 2015. "Effect of the Government's Use of Social Media on the Reliability of the Government: Focus on Twitter," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 328-355, March.
    16. Jhon G. Botello & Katherine Palacio & Erika Frydenlund & Humberto Llinás & Jose J. Padilla, 2024. "Adapting and Validating a Survey to Assess Host Communities Support for Migration," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 697-720, September.
    17. Busemeyer, Marius R., 2021. "Health care attitudes and institutional trust during the COVID-19 crisis: Evidence from the case of Germany," Working Papers 01, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    18. Ankush Goyal & Rajender Kumar, 2022. "Does Social Welfare Programmes Influence Households Trust in Local Administration and Their Political Participation? Evidence from the MGNREG Scheme in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 16(3), pages 602-617, December.
    19. Anna Kern, 2017. "The Effect of Direct Democratic Participation on Citizens’ Political Attitudes in Switzerland: The Difference between Availability and Use," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 16-26.
    20. Rong Hu & Ivan Y. Sun & Yuning Wu, 2015. "Chinese Trust in the Police: The Impact of Political Efficacy and Participation," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(4), pages 1012-1026, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    state financial control; financial resources; financial misconduct; preventive control system; centralization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2020:6:2:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.