IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v70y2024i6id287-2023-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation for development of sustainable integrated plantation polyculture on dry land: Using Structural Equation Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Rina Nuryati

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Siliwangi University, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia)

  • Lies Sulistyowati

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang, Indonesia)

  • Trisna Insan Noor

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang, Indonesia)

  • Iwan Setiawan

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang, Indonesia)

Abstract

The land in the South Tasikmalaya Regency is dominated by dry land with a steep and hilly land contour. In addition, the area has a shallow soil solum, so it has a high potential for erosion and landslides. Therefore, it is necessary to innovate an integrated cultivation system that is economically feasible, but still maintains environmental sustainability. In this research, the aim is to formulate a model for the development of integrated plantation polyculture farming (IPPF) for the welfare of farmers. The method in this study uses a mixed method design. The location of the research carried out is in the Tasikmalaya Regency. The data used are the results of interviews and questionnaires to 250 IPPF farmers. The data used were obtained by multistage cluster random sampling. The sustainable IPPF development model was analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). This analysis is used to determine the various potential capital factors for agricultural development on the sustainable development of the IPPF and farmers' welfare. The results of the study show that the potential development capital [natural resources (SDA) capital, economic capital, socio-cultural capital, physical capital, and multifunctional IPPF], jointly or partially affect the IPPF sustainability. Human resource capital has no effect on the sustainable IPPF development, while the sustainable IPPF development affects the farmers' welfare levels, and the potential agricultural development capital and its multifunctionality affect the sustainable IPPF development and farmers' welfare. The IPPF development model that improves the welfare of farmers is carried out through the development of specific local superior commodities, increasing the added value and cooperation, developing access to credit, regenerating farmers, sustainable assistance and infrastructure improvements. The results of this study are expected to be a reference for the government in improving IPPF sustainability to achieve the welfare of its farmers. Apart from that, the model that has been developed can make a contribution to science in the form of a comprehensive analysis of the factors that influence the sustainability of IPPF.

Suggested Citation

  • Rina Nuryati & Lies Sulistyowati & Trisna Insan Noor & Iwan Setiawan, 2024. "Innovation for development of sustainable integrated plantation polyculture on dry land: Using Structural Equation Modelling," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(6), pages 291-308.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:70:y:2024:i:6:id:287-2023-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/287/2023-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/287/2023-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/287/2023-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/287/2023-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iskandar Zainuddin Rela & Muhammad Zamrun Firihu & Abd Hair Awang & Marsuki Iswandi & Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Anas Nikoyan & La Nalefo & Hartina Batoa & Salahuddin Salahuddin, 2021. "Formation of Farming Community Resilience Models for Sustainable Agricultural Development at the Mining Neighborhood in Southeast Sulawesi Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Keiko Sasaki & Stefan Hotes & Tomohiro Ichinose & Tomoko Doko & Volkmar Wolters, 2021. "Hotspots of Agricultural Ecosystem Services and Farmland Biodiversity Overlap with Areas at Risk of Land Abandonment in Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Ganjar Kurnia & Iwan Setiawan & Ahmad C. Tridakusumah & Gani Jaelani & Mahra A. Heryanto & Adi Nugraha, 2022. "Local Wisdom for Ensuring Agriculture Sustainability: A Case from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Nguyen Khanh Doanh & Nguyen Thi Thu Thuong & Yoon Heo, 2018. "Impact of Conversion to Organic Tea Cultivation on Household Income in the Mountainous Areas of Northern Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Bikila Jabessa Bulitta & Lalisa A. Duguma, 2021. "The Unexplored Socio-Cultural Benefits of Coffee Plants: Implications for the Sustainable Management of Ethiopia’s Coffee Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist & Helena Hansson & Ulf Sonesson & Stefan Gunnarsson, 2020. "Research on Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Dairy Farming: A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Ronja Herzberg & Tung Gia Pham & Martin Kappas & Daniel Wyss & Chau Thi Minh Tran, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Land Evaluation of Potential Agricultural Land Use Types in a Hilly Area of Central Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Peter Weißhuhn & Moritz Reckling & Ulrich Stachow & Hubert Wiggering, 2017. "Supporting Agricultural Ecosystem Services through the Integration of Perennial Polycultures into Crop Rotations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Enfors, Elin & Barron, Jennie & Makurira, Hodson & Rockström, Johan & Tumbo, Siza, 2011. "Yield and soil system changes from conservation tillage in dryland farming: A case study from North Eastern Tanzania," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(11), pages 1687-1695, September.
    10. Jennifer Morash & Amy Wright & Charlene LeBleu & Amanda Meder & Raymond Kessler & Eve Brantley & Julie Howe, 2019. "Increasing Sustainability of Residential Areas Using Rain Gardens to Improve Pollutant Capture, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Scott M. Swinton & Frank Lupi & G. Philip Robertson & Douglas A. Landis, 2006. "Ecosystem Services from Agriculture: Looking Beyond the Usual Suspects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1160-1166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist & Helena Hansson & Ulf Sonesson & Stefan Gunnarsson, 2021. "A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature on Sustainability at Farm-Level in Beef and Lamb Meat Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Timothy E. Crews & Douglas J. Cattani, 2018. "Strategies, Advances, and Challenges in Breeding Perennial Grain Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, June.
    3. Qenani-Petrela, Eivis & Noel, Jay E. & Mastin, Thomas, 2007. "A Benefit Transfer Approach to the Estimation of Agro-Ecosystems Services Benefits: A Case Study of Kern County, California," Research Project Reports 121605, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    4. Radosavljevic, Sonja & Haider, L. Jamila & Lade, Steven J. & Schlüter, Maja, 2021. "Implications of poverty traps across levels," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Kwayu, Emmanuel J. & Sallu, Susannah M. & Paavola, Jouni, 2014. "Farmer participation in the equitable payments for watershed services in Morogoro, Tanzania," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 1-9.
    6. Tamini, Lota D., 2011. "A nonparametric analysis of the impact of agri-environmental advisory activities on best management practice adoption: A case study of Québec," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1363-1374, May.
    7. Cristina Pavanello & Marcello Franchini & Stefano Bovolenta & Elisa Marraccini & Mirco Corazzin, 2024. "Sustainability Indicators for Dairy Cattle Farms in European Union Countries: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Hamdani Hamdani, 2016. "Economic Valuation of Oil Palm Plantation Investment in Swamp Area of Tapin Regency, South Kalimantan, Indonesia," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Barrios, Edmundo, 2007. "Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 269-285, December.
    10. Francesco Piras & Beatrice Fiore & Antonio Santoro, 2022. "Small Cultural Forests: Landscape Role and Ecosystem Services in a Japanese Cultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Anne-Charlotte Hoes & Lusine Aramyan, 2022. "Blind Spot for Pioneering Farmers? Reflections on Dutch Dairy Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Wainger, Lisa A. & King, Dennis M. & Mack, Richard N. & Price, Elizabeth W. & Maslin, Thomas, 2010. "Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 978-987, March.
    13. Dominati, Estelle & Patterson, Murray & Mackay, Alec, 2010. "A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1858-1868, July.
    14. Kiefer, Katharina & Kremer, Jasper & Zeitner, Philipp & Winkler, Bastian & Wagner, Moritz & von Cossel, Moritz, 2023. "Monetizing ecosystem services of perennial wild plant mixtures for bioenergy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Marie Perennes & C. Sylvie Campagne & Felix Müller & Philip Roche & Benjamin Burkhard, 2020. "Refining the Tiered Approach for Mapping and Assessing Ecosystem Services at the Local Scale: A Case Study in a Rural Landscape in Northern Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Pia Minixhofer & Rosemarie Stangl, 2021. "Green Infrastructures and the Consideration of Their Soil-Related Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Reich, Denis Andrew, 2007. "Evaluating the Conservation Security Program utilizing the perceptions and economics of producer participation: implications for land stewardship in Iowa agriculture," ISU General Staff Papers 2007010108000016024, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Jie Yin & Xu Zhao & Wenjia Zhang & Pei Wang, 2020. "Rural Land Use Change Driven by Informal Industrialization: Evidence from Fengzhuang Village in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Anja Scheurich & Alexandra Penicka & Stefan Hörtenhuber & Thomas Lindenthal & Elisabeth Quendler & Werner Zollitsch, 2021. "Elements of Social Sustainability among Austrian Hay Milk Farmers: Between Satisfaction and Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Brandon Schlautman & Spencer Barriball & Claudia Ciotir & Sterling Herron & Allison J. Miller, 2018. "Perennial Grain Legume Domestication Phase I: Criteria for Candidate Species Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:70:y:2024:i:6:id:287-2023-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.