IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nglost/v4y2010i2p25n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

India, Brazil and South Africa: Collective Action, Divergent Positions

Author

Listed:
  • de Oliveira Amâncio Jorge

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Onuki Janina

    (University of São Paulo)

Abstract

The objective of this article is to contribute to the further comprehension of the basis of the formation of international coalitions, or partnerships, of the South-South-type in the new context of the multilateral agenda, taking as an indication of the preferences of such countries the adopted positions in key international arenas. As can be observed the first arrangements of the new round of WTO negotiations, the Doha Round, the coalitions are going to have a central role. In those, the leadership of the regional powers from the South or of intermediate countries will be fundamental. The cooperative efforts of this nature have already consubstantiated with the formation of a series of coalitions, primarily the G-20 or G-3 (IBSA, India-Brazil-South Africa coalition). The convergence of international trade interests at the IBSA is clearly counterintuitive in the efforts of building international coalitions. Indeed, the rationale of the formation of the India-Brazil partnership demands an explanation that centers simultaneously on a deeper and systematic comprehension of the economic interests of both countries and on other interests that go beyond those trade questions.

Suggested Citation

  • de Oliveira Amâncio Jorge & Onuki Janina, 2010. "India, Brazil and South Africa: Collective Action, Divergent Positions," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 1-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:25:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/1940-0004.1087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-0004.1087
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1940-0004.1087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mushin Lee & Howard Rosenthal, 1976. "A Behavioral Model of Coalition Formation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(4), pages 563-588, December.
    2. Higgott, Richard A. & Cooper, Andrew Fenton, 1990. "Middle power leadership and coalition building: Australia, the Cairns Group, and the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 589-632, October.
    3. John Whalley, 1989. "Coalitions in the Uruguay round," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 125(3), pages 547-562, September.
    4. repec:bla:econom:v:65:y:1998:i:258:p:161-77 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kenneth E. Friend & James D. Laing & Richard J. Morrison, 1977. "Bargaining Processes and Coalition Outcomes," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(2), pages 267-298, June.
    6. Bruce M. Russett, 1968. "Components of an operational theory of international alliance formation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 12(3), pages 285-301, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kym Anderson, 2020. "Trade Protectionism In Australia: Its Growth And Dismantling," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 1044-1067, December.
    2. Lajtos, Ildikó, 2010. "Verhandlungsverhalten und Anspruchsanpassung im internationalen Verhandlungsprozess: Die WTO-Agrarverhandlungen zum Abbau exportwettbewerbsfördernder Maßnahmen," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 55, number 94723.
    3. Diwan, Ishac & Rodrik, Dani, 1991. "Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1-2), pages 27-47, February.
    4. Stringer, Christina A., 2000. "New Zealand's Agro-Food Trade to Korea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 425-442, March.
    5. W Moran, 1992. "Commentary," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(6), pages 771-774, June.
    6. Schor Adriana, 2014. "South–South Cooperation and IBSA: More Trade in Politics," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 183-201, July.
    7. Siegfried Schultz, 1989. "Developing countries and services," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 24(5), pages 227-233, September.
    8. Javier Vadell, 2019. "La iniciativa BRICS y China: entre la emergencia y la irrelevancia [A iniciativa BRICS e a China: entre a emergência e a irrelevância]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 29(2), pages 401-428, May-Augus.
    9. Moohyung Cho & Tim Büthe, 2021. "From rule‐taker to rule‐promoting regulatory state: South Korea in the nearly‐global competition regime," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 513-543, July.
    10. Amrita Narlikar & Diana Tussie, 2004. "The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 947-966, July.
    11. Carl Saxer, 2013. "Capabilities and aspirations: South Korea’s rise as a middle power," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 397-413, December.
    12. Michel Le Breton & Karine Van Der Straeten, 2017. "Alliances Électorales et Gouvernementales : La Contribution de la Théorie des Jeux Coopératifs à la Science Politique," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(4), pages 637-736.
    13. Kent Jones, 2009. "Green room politics and the WTO's crisis of representation," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 9(4), pages 349-357, October.
    14. Destradi, Sandra, 2008. "Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership: Developing a Research Framework for the Study of Regional Powers," GIGA Working Papers 79, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:25:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.