IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nov/artigo/v29y2019i2p401-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La iniciativa BRICS y China: entre la emergencia y la irrelevancia [A iniciativa BRICS e a China: entre a emergência e a irrelevância]

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Vadell

    (PUC-MG)

Abstract

O objetivo deste artigo é analisar os BRICS a partir de uma perspectiva crítica. O trabalho começa apresentando o surgimento dos BRICS como uma “formação econômica e política”, segundo as teorias tradicionais das RIs e da EPI. As questões principais são: os BRICS desafiam a ordem liberal Ocidental? De que maneira essa transformação afeta o desenvolvimento e a inserção global dos países periféricos? A nossa hipótese é que o processo de fortalecimento institucional de los BRICS e a possibilidade de expansão para um BRICS plus não é um acontecimento isolado. Isto é, não se pode interpretar os BRICS sem levar em consideração o papel de liderança da China no estabelicimento de novas instituições globais, que implicam em mudanças na hegemonía global

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Vadell, 2019. "La iniciativa BRICS y China: entre la emergencia y la irrelevancia [A iniciativa BRICS e a China: entre a emergência e a irrelevância]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 29(2), pages 401-428, May-Augus.
    • Handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:29:y:2019:i:2:p:401-428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/neco/v29n2/1980-5381-neco-29-02-0401.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-63512019000200401&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woosang Kim & Scott Gates, 2015. "Power transition theory and the rise of China," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 219-226, September.
    2. Thomas Ambrosio, 2017. "The Architecture of Alignment: The Russia–China Relationship and International Agreements," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 110-156, January.
    3. Andrew Cooper, 2013. "Squeezed or revitalised? Middle powers, the G20 and the evolution of global governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 963-984.
    4. Higgott, Richard A. & Cooper, Andrew Fenton, 1990. "Middle power leadership and coalition building: Australia, the Cairns Group, and the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 589-632, October.
    5. Bielschowsky, Ricardo, 2000. "Cinqüenta anos de pensamento na CEPAL: uma resenha," Copublicaciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 1610.
    6. Deepak Nayyar, 2016. "BRICS, developing countries and global governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 575-591, April.
    7. Ahmed Khalid, 2014. "The power of the BRICS in world trade and growth, analysing the macroeconomic impacts within and across the bloc," Chapters, in: Vai Io Lo & Mary Hiscock (ed.), The Rise of the BRICS in the Global Political Economy, chapter 10, pages 162-190, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Benjamin J. Cohen, 2014. "Advanced Introduction to International Political Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15060.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moohyung Cho & Tim Büthe, 2021. "From rule‐taker to rule‐promoting regulatory state: South Korea in the nearly‐global competition regime," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 513-543, July.
    2. Ahmet Ates, 2021. "Catastrophic Beasts and How to Study Them Researching Illicit Financial Activities in International Political Economy," Bingol University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bingol University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 5(2), pages 215-240, December.
    3. Mark Beeson & Jolanta Hewitt, 2022. "Does Multilateralism still Matter? ASEAN and the Arctic Council in Comparative Perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 208-218, May.
    4. Xiaoguang Wang, 2020. "Leadership-building dilemmas in emerging powers’ economic diplomacy: Russia’s energy diplomacy and China’s OBOR," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 117-138, March.
    5. Francesco Petrone, 2021. "BRICS and Global Governance: Will the Grouping be able to Reform the United Nations Security Council?," International Studies, , vol. 58(3), pages 363-379, July.
    6. Simon Glaze, 2015. "Schools Out: Adam Smith and Pre-disciplinary International Political Economy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 679-701, October.
    7. Schor Adriana, 2014. "South–South Cooperation and IBSA: More Trade in Politics," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 183-201, July.
    8. Khan, Haider, 2023. "War and Peace in East Asia: Avoiding Thucydides’s Trap with China as a Rising Power," MPRA Paper 117089, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Pami Aalto & Tuomas Forsberg, 2016. "The structuration of Russia’s geo-economy under economic sanctions," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 221-237, June.
    10. Marco Flávio da Cunha Resende & Daniela Almeida Raposo Torres, 2008. "National Innovation System, Trade Elasticities and Economic Growth," Anais do XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 36th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 200807211110340, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    11. Darian-Smith Eve, 2017. "Thinking Globally: Reassessing the Fields of Law, Politics and Economics in the US Academy," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 11(3), pages 243-263, December.
    12. Erik Bengtsson & Magnus Ryner, 2015. "The (International) Political Economy of Falling Wage Shares: Situating Working-Class Agency," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 406-430, June.
    13. Bora Jeong & Hoon Lee, 2021. "US–China commercial rivalry, great war and middle powers," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 135-148, June.
    14. Acquaye, Adolf & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Genovese, Andrea & Afrifa, Godfred A & Yamoah, Fred A & Oppon, Eunice, 2018. "A quantitative model for environmentally sustainable supply chain performance measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 188-205.
    15. Carl Saxer, 2013. "Capabilities and aspirations: South Korea’s rise as a middle power," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 397-413, December.
    16. Kym Anderson, 2020. "Trade Protectionism In Australia: Its Growth And Dismantling," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 1044-1067, December.
    17. André Moreira Cunha & Julimar Da Silva Bichara & Marcos Tadeu Caputi Lélis & Julien Marcel Demeulemeester, 2016. "Brazil´S Development Pattern In A Sino-Centred World: An International Political Economy Perspective," Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 079, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    18. Victor Alexandre G. Teixeira, 2021. "The Hegemony’s Contest in the South China Sea," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    19. Soares, José Alex Rego, 2014. "Uma interpretação do novo desenvolvimentismo a partir da conjuntura econômica da América Latina," Documentos de Proyectos 36712, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    20. Richard Higgott & J J Woo & Tim Legrand, 2021. "The demand for IPEand public policy in the governance of global policy design [The emerging regional architecture of world politics]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(4), pages 449-466.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BRICS; potências emergentes; China; relações internacionais; hegemonia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements
    • F60 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nov:artigo:v:29:y:2019:i:2:p:401-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucas Resende de Carvalho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fufmgbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.