IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v10y2014i1p27-36n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between concentration of scoring and offensive efficiency in the NBA

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiz Manuel

    (Department of Quantitative Methods and Computing, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30201, Spain)

  • Martinez Jose A.

    (Department of Business Economics, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30201, Spain)

  • López-Hernández Fernando A.

    (Department of Quantitative Methods and Computing, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30201, Spain)

  • Castellano Almudena

    (Department of Business Economics, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30201, Spain)

Abstract

In this research we study the relationship between concentration of scoring production (measured with the Gini index of team points) and teams’ offensive efficiency (measured as normalised team points per minutes played and possessions) in the game of basketball. We record the aggregate box-score statistics of all teams from the 1977/1978 to the 2010/2011 seasons in the NBA, together with each player’s contribution to his respective team’s offensive production. After applying a fixed effect regression model, we find evidence of a positive relationship between concentration of production and offensive efficiency, which contradicts some recent thesis (Skinner, Brian. 2010. “The Price of Anarchy in Basketball.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 6:Article 3) about the nature of this association. Our results suggest that that the well known mass-media concepts such as “big three” or “big four” to design successful teams make sense. Teams with more talent and with several big stars will (probably) increase its concentration of scoring, and this will be associated with an increase in its offensive efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiz Manuel & Martinez Jose A. & López-Hernández Fernando A. & Castellano Almudena, 2014. "The relationship between concentration of scoring and offensive efficiency in the NBA," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 27-36, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:27-36:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/jqas-2013-0060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2013-0060
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jqas-2013-0060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skinner Brian, 2010. "The Price of Anarchy in Basketball," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Daniel Hoechle, 2007. "Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(3), pages 281-312, September.
    3. James R. Hill & Nicholas A. Jolly, 2012. "Salary Distribution and Collective Bargaining Agreements: A Case Study of the NBA," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 342-363, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfred Garloff & Carsten Pohl & Norbert Schanne, 2013. "Do small labor market entry cohorts reduce unemployment?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(15), pages 379-406.
    2. Ayhan, Fatih & Elal, Onuray, 2023. "The IMPACTS of technological change on employment: Evidence from OECD countries with panel data analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Chimere O. Iheonu, 2019. "Governance and Domestic Investment in Africa," Working Papers 19/001, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
    4. Shi, Ruoding & Isengildina Massa, Olga, 2018. "Double-Edged Sword: Liquidity Implications of Futures Hedging," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274106, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Raffaella Santolini, 2017. "Electoral Rules And Public Spending Composition: The Case Of Italian Regions," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 35(3), pages 551-577, July.
    6. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Martina Vukašina & Ines Kersan-Škabiæ & Edvard Orliæ, 2022. "Impact of European structural and investment funds absorption on the regional development in the EU–12 (new member states)," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(4), pages 857-880, December.
    8. Ding, Mingfa, 2014. "Political Connections and Stock Liquidity: Political Network, Hierarchy and Intervention," Knut Wicksell Working Paper Series 2014/7, Lund University, Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies.
    9. Younes Gholizadeh, 2020. "Causality Relationship between Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in the European Union Countries," EERI Research Paper Series EERI RP 2020/12, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    10. Skare, Marinko & Gavurova, Beata & Sinkovic, Dean, 2023. "Regional aspects of financial development and renewable energy: A cross-sectional study in 214 countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1142-1157.
    11. Pablo Quinonez & Joselin Saenz & Jessica Solorzano, 2018. "Does foreign direct investment reduce poverty? The case of Latin America in the twenty-first century," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(3), pages 488-500, June.
    12. Damodar Nepram, 2018. "Does VAT Necessarily Lead to Bigger Government Size? The Experience of States in India," South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, , vol. 7(2), pages 240-259, December.
    13. Anderton Charles H. & Anderton Roxane A., 2021. "The Trade Disruption Hypothesis Fails for State-Sponsored Genocides and Mass Atrocities: Why It Matters," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 27(2), pages 143-168, May.
    14. Diego Amaya & Jean-François Bégin & Geneviève Gauthier, 2022. "The Informational Content of High-Frequency Option Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2166-2201, March.
    15. Bertoli, Simone & Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús, 2013. "Multilateral resistance to migration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 79-100.
    16. Indra de Soysa, 2022. "Economic freedom vs. egalitarianism: An empirical test of weak & strong sustainability, 1970–2017," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 236-268, May.
    17. Wataru Miyamoto & Thuy Lan Nguyen & Dmitriy Sergeyev, 2018. "Government Spending Multipliers under the Zero Lower Bound: Evidence from Japan," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 247-277, July.
    18. Mark C. Strazicich & Peter A. Groothuis & Tiberiu S.V. Ungureanu, 2024. "A Rising Tide Raises all Boats: The changing distribution of salaries in the NBA over time," Working Papers 24-20, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    19. Liu, Lily Y. & Patton, Andrew J. & Sheppard, Kevin, 2015. "Does anything beat 5-minute RV? A comparison of realized measures across multiple asset classes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 293-311.
    20. Alessandro Federici & Pierluigi Montalbano, 2012. "Macroeconomic volatility, consumption behaviour and welfare: A cross-country analysis," Working Paper Series 3612, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:10:y:2014:i:1:p:27-36:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.