IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2024-05-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Quality and Financial Statement Manipulation: The Moderating Effect of Tone at the Top

Author

Listed:
  • Alastair Marais

    (School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)

Abstract

South Africa has recently fallen victim to numerous major corporate frauds. This has called into question South Africa’s audit quality, as indicated by its loss of the number one place for auditing and reporting standard strength, according to the World Economic Forum. This study examined the moderating effect of tone at the top on the relationship between audit quality and financial statement manipulation. Using a South African sample of 829 firm-year observations from 2011 until 2018, principal component analysis was used to construct two audit quality variables (competence and independence) and two tone at the top variables (autocratic and pragmatic). Financial statement manipulation was measured using fraud and discretionary accruals. The findings revealed that while an autocratic tone strengthened the negative relationship between audit quality and fraud, it also resulted in higher income-increasing discretionary accruals. This study contributes to the audit quality literature in South Africa by revealing how the tone at the top can affect the auditor’s ability to conduct a quality audit. The results will interest auditors and shareholders seeking to reduce fraud and earnings management.

Suggested Citation

  • Alastair Marais, 2024. "Audit Quality and Financial Statement Manipulation: The Moderating Effect of Tone at the Top," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 220-232, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-05-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/16409/8154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/16409
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Audit Quality; Financial Statement Manipulation; Discretionary Accruals; Fraud; Tone at the Top; South Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-05-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.