IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/journl/v19y2024i2p120-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness Of The Logistic Strategy Framework In Post-Covid-19 Environment: An Empirical Study Of Indian Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Ali KARA

    (Penn State York Campus, York, PA, USA)

  • John E. SPILLAN

    (University of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, NC, USA)

  • Shyam S. PRASAD

    (International School of Management, Bengaluru, India)

Abstract

Although testing the Bowersox and Daugherty (B&D) (1987) typology in international markets have provided valuable insights into the model’s relevance in logistics, literature has not re-examined the B&D model’s effectiveness during the post-pandemic business environments. The current research examines the robustness of the B&D logistics strategy framework during the post-COVID-19 Indian market environment. Using a structured questionnaire, the data for this study (n=372) was collected from the executives whose main job responsibility was related to distribution/logistics decisions in micro and small-sized (MSEs) manufacturers in India. Based on the conceptual relationships identified in the B&D typology, we used structural equation modeling to test the study hypotheses. Results show that overall logistics strategy comprised of three strategic priorities positively influences firms’ competitive responsiveness through the logistics coordination effectiveness and customer service commitment route, supporting the robustness of the model in the post COVID-19 environment. Effective logistics strategy does not occur in isolation. Emphasis in coordination and customer service must occur for a well thought out logistics strategy (process, market, and information orientation) to improve organizational competitive responsiveness in the context of Indian MSEs. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical support for the validity and the robustness of the B&D logistics strategy model during the post COVID-19 environment in an emerging market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali KARA & John E. SPILLAN & Shyam S. PRASAD, 2024. "Robustness Of The Logistic Strategy Framework In Post-Covid-19 Environment: An Empirical Study Of Indian Enterprises," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 120-137, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:120-137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://magazines.ulbsibiu.ro/eccsf/RePEc/blg/journl/19209kara.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed M. Attia, 2014. "Testing Bowersox and Daugherty topology in Egypt - an empirical study on the pharmaceutical industry," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 228-238.
    2. Anand Gurumurthy & Gunjan Soni & Surya Prakash & Gaurav Kumar Badhotiya, 2013. "Review on Supply Chain Management Research—An Indian Perspective," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Ana C. Paixão Casaca & Peter B. Marlow, 2009. "Logistics strategies for short sea shipping operating as part of multimodal transport chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morales-Fusco, Pau & Grau, Marc & Saurí, Sergi, 2018. "Effects of RoPax shipping line strategies on freight price and transporter’s choice. Policy implications for promoting MoS," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 67-76.
    2. Ilona & Urbanyi-Popiolek, 2022. "New Insights into the Ferry Business in the Turbulent Environment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 63-73.
    3. Morales-Fusco, Pau & Saurí, Sergi & Lago, Alejandro, 2012. "Potential freight distribution improvements using motorways of the sea," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Tiago A Santos & C Guedes Soares, 2017. "Modeling transportation demand in short sea shipping," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(4), pages 695-722, December.
    5. Anastasia Christodoulou & Zeeshan Raza & Johan Woxenius, 2019. "The Integration of RoRo Shipping in Sustainable Intermodal Transport Chains: The Case of a North European RoRo Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Ilona & Urbanyi-Popiolek, 2023. "Development of the Ferry and Ro-Ro Industry in an Uncertain Environment," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 855-864.
    7. Ching-Chiao Yang & Hui-Huang Tai & Wen-Hsing Chiu, 2014. "Factors influencing container carriers' use of coastal shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 192-208, March.
    8. Ilona & Urbanyi-Popiolek, 2021. "Management of the Ferry Shipping and Ferry Ports in Regional Transport Systems Between Continental Europe and the Nordic Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 524-534.
    9. Juan Carlos Pérez-Mesa & Lucía Aballay & Mª Serrano-Arcos & Raquel Sánchez-Fernández, 2020. "Analysis of Intermodal Transport Potentials for Vegetables Export from Southeast Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Gertjan van den Bos & Bart Wiegmans, 2018. "Short sea shipping: a statistical analysis of influencing factors on SSS in European countries," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Antonio Comi & Antonio Polimeni, 2020. "Assessing the Potential of Short Sea Shipping and the Benefits in Terms of External Costs: Application to the Mediterranean Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:19:y:2024:i:2:p:120-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Herciu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.