IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/iimkoz/v2y2013i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review on Supply Chain Management Research—An Indian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Anand Gurumurthy

    (Anand Gurumurthy (corresponding author) is an Assistant Professor, Quantitative Methods & Operations Management (QM & OM) Area, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode (IIMK), IIMK Campus, Kunnamangalam, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. E-mail: anandg@iimk.ac.in)

  • Gunjan Soni

    (Gunjan Soni is Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology (MNIT), Jaipur, India. E-mail: gunjan1980@mnit.ac.in; gunjan1980@gmail.com)

  • Surya Prakash

    (Surya Prakash is a Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology (MNIT) Jaipur, India. E-mail: suryayadav8383@gmail.com)

  • Gaurav Kumar Badhotiya

    (Gaurav Kumar Badhotiya is a Postgraduate Student (Manufacturing Systems Engineering), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology (MNIT), Jaipur, India. E-mail: gkb.choudhary@gmail.com)

Abstract

In India, Supply Chain Management (SCM) has gained significant importance due to opening up of domestic economy as a result of globalization. However, a review of literature revealed that not many papers are available which attempt to document and understand the importance of SCM within the Indian business context. Hence, the purpose of this research is to fill in this research gap by analyzing the contributions of academicians and practitioners addressing various supply chain issues—specifically from an Indian perspective. Papers focusing on SCM scenario in India were collected from multiple sources by following the established methodologies available in the literature for carrying out such reviews. Furthermore, a new taxonomy was proposed on the basis of content and research methodology utilized. Based on this taxonomy, significant trends were observed and some unique inferences were drawn, apart from identifying the directions for future research. It is hoped that this work would add value by offering a unique contribution to the body of knowledge on SCM, as there is no article available in the literature, which has attempted to summarize the works from India related to SCM.

Suggested Citation

  • Anand Gurumurthy & Gunjan Soni & Surya Prakash & Gaurav Kumar Badhotiya, 2013. "Review on Supply Chain Management Research—An Indian Perspective," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:1-19
    DOI: 10.1177/2277975213496508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277975213496508
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277975213496508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    2. Meixell, Mary J. & Gargeya, Vidyaranya B., 2005. "Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 531-550, November.
    3. Arshinder & Kanda, Arun & Deshmukh, S.G., 2008. "Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 316-335, October.
    4. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    5. Baindur, Deepak & Macário, Rosário M., 2013. "Mumbai lunch box delivery system: A transferable benchmark in urban logistics?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 110-121.
    6. Árni Halldórsson & Jan Stentoft Arlbjørn, 2005. "Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management — What Do We Know?," Springer Books, in: Herbert Kotzab & Stefan Seuring & Martin Müller & Gerald Reiner (ed.), Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management, pages 107-122, Springer.
    7. Grieger, Martin, 2003. "Electronic marketplaces: A literature review and a call for supply chain management research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 280-294, January.
    8. Sarac, Aysegul & Absi, Nabil & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane, 2010. "A literature review on the impact of RFID technologies on supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 77-95, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali KARA & John E. SPILLAN & Shyam S. PRASAD, 2024. "Robustness Of The Logistic Strategy Framework In Post-Covid-19 Environment: An Empirical Study Of Indian Enterprises," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 120-137, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasani, Aliakbar & Khosrojerdi, Amirhossein, 2016. "Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: A parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 20-52.
    2. Correia, Isabel & Melo, Teresa & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2012. "Comparing classical performance measures for a multi-period, two-echelon supply chain network design problem with sizing decisions," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 1, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.
    3. Thomé, Antonio Márcio T. & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Pires, Sílvio R.I. & Ceryno, Paula & Klingebiel, Katja, 2014. "A multi-tier study on supply chain flexibility in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 91-105.
    4. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    5. Van Engeland, Jens & Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & De Jaeger, Simon, 2020. "Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Sahling, Florian & Kayser, Ariane, 2016. "Strategic supply network planning with vendor selection under consideration of risk and demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 201-214.
    7. Sheu, Jiuh Biing & Kundu, Tanmoy, 2018. "Forecasting time-varying logistics distribution flows in the One Belt-One Road strategic context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 5-22.
    8. Kanokporn Kungwalsong & Abraham Mendoza & Vasanth Kamath & Subramanian Pazhani & Jose Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo, 2022. "An application of interactive fuzzy optimization model for redesigning supply chain for resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1803-1839, August.
    9. An, Kun & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2016. "Robust grain supply chain design considering post-harvest loss and harvest timing equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 110-128.
    10. J. Zambujal-Oliveira, 2021. "Supply Chain Innovation Research: A Conceptual Approach of Information Management with Game Theory," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 377-394, April.
    11. Huang, Yongxi & Chen, Yihsu, 2014. "Analysis of an imperfectly competitive cellulosic biofuel supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    13. Moritz Julius Ziegler & Kilian Seifried & Philipp Kuske & Moritz Fleischmann, 2019. "TRUMPF Uses a Mixed Integer Model as Decision Support for Strategic Production Network Design," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 213-226, May.
    14. Anne Lange & Werner Delfmann, 2017. "Network concentration indices for less-than-truckload transportation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1475-1497, November.
    15. Zhang, Abraham & Luo, Hao & Huang, George Q., 2013. "A bi-objective model for supply chain design of dispersed manufacturing in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 48-58.
    16. Cardoso, Sónia R. & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula F.D. & Relvas, Susana, 2013. "Design and planning of supply chains with integration of reverse logistics activities under demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 436-451.
    17. Christian Finnsgård & Joakim Kalantari & Zeeshan Raza & Violeta Roso & Johan Woxenius, 2018. "Swedish shippers’ strategies for coping with slow-steaming in deep sea container shipping," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Angelos Georghiou & Daniel Kuhn & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2019. "The decision rule approach to optimization under uncertainty: methodology and applications," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 545-576, October.
    19. Hammami, R. & Frein, Y., 2014. "Redesign of global supply chains with integration of transfer pricing: Mathematical modeling and managerial insights," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 267-277.
    20. Jakubovskis, Aldis, 2017. "Strategic facility location, capacity acquisition, and technology choice decisions under demand uncertainty: Robust vs. non-robust optimization approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1095-1104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:iimkoz:v:2:y:2013:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.