IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v40y2023i6p819-835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a sustainable integrated management approach to uncertainty surrounding COVID‐19

Author

Listed:
  • Tiep Nguyen
  • Leonie Hallo
  • Nicholas Chileshe
  • Nghia Hoai Nguyen

Abstract

Traditional approaches to system management are not suited to highly uncertain conditions. Hard system approaches with a top‐down management approach are often used to manage well‐defined systems that are not easily able to cope with uncertainty. Soft system approaches of the with bottom‐up or participative style may cause a lack of conformance to industry standards. Few studies have investigated these approaches within the context of COVID‐19 pandemic. Therefore, this paper aims to use the philosophy of Total Systems Intervention to investigate the applicability of an integrated management approach to cope with the uncertainty of COVID‐19. Three different countries from Europe, Oceania and Asia are selected as typical case studies to clarify the strengths and weaknesses of differing management approaches. The case studies demonstrate that using an integrated management approach can potentially assist decision‐makers to deal with crises and conclusively reveal the superiority of the integrated approach, independent of cultural milieu.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiep Nguyen & Leonie Hallo & Nicholas Chileshe & Nghia Hoai Nguyen, 2023. "Towards a sustainable integrated management approach to uncertainty surrounding COVID‐19," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 819-835, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:6:p:819-835
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:6:p:819-835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.