IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v40y2023i4p617-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical systems practice 4: Check—Evaluating and reflecting on a multimethodological intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Michael C. Jackson

Abstract

This is the fourth of a series of papers on the stages of critical systems practice. Critical systems practice is a multimethodology that seeks to employ the ideas of critical systems thinking to intervene in and improve complex real‐world ‘messes’. It has four stages—Explore (the problem situation), Produce (an intervention strategy), Intervene (flexibly), and Check (on progress)—called to mind as EPIC. The aim is to set out where thinking has reached on the best way to carry out each of these stages and to invite comment on what more needs doing. This paper discusses the fourth stage, Check. During Check, decision makers, and other stakeholders, evaluate the intervention, reflect on what has happened with a view to improving future interventions, and discuss next steps.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael C. Jackson, 2023. "Critical systems practice 4: Check—Evaluating and reflecting on a multimethodological intervention," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 617-632, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:4:p:617-632
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2912
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Jackson, 2020. "Critical systems practice 1: Explore—Starting a multimethodological intervention," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 839-858, September.
    2. Martin Reynolds & Emily Gates & Richard Hummelbrunner & Mita Marra & Bob Williams, 2016. "Towards Systemic Evaluation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 662-673, September.
    3. Gregory, A., 1996. "The road to integration. Reflections on the development of organizational evaluation theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 295-307, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roelien Goede, 2020. "Nature's enduring patterns: A path to systems literacy," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 787-788, September.
    2. Zhichang Zhu, 2022. "Paradigm, specialty, pragmatism: Kuhn's legacy to methodological pluralism," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 895-912, September.
    3. Seyed Ashkan Zarghami, 2024. "Project schedule contingency planning: Building on von Bertalanffy's open systems theory and critical systems practice," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 247-261, March.
    4. Foote, J. & Midgley, G. & Ahuriri-Driscoll, A. & Hepi, M. & Earl-Goulet, J., 2021. "Systemic evaluation of community environmental management programmes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 207-224.
    5. Luis Arturo Pinzon‐Salcedo & María Alejandra Torres‐Cuello, 2022. "Systems thinking concepts within a collaborative programme evaluation methodology: The Hermes Programme evaluation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 708-722, July.
    6. Gerald Midgley & Erik Lindhult, 2021. "A systems perspective on systemic innovation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 635-670, October.
    7. Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2023. "Holistic Flexibility for Deploying Systems Thinking as a Cognitive Skill," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 803-825, October.
    8. Marra, Mita, 2022. "Productive interactions in digital training partnerships: Lessons learned for regional development and university societal impact assessment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Graeme Nicholas, 2022. "Getting to practical: Complementarity between critical systems thinking and phronetic social science," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 913-922, September.
    10. Bustamante, María & Rillo, Carlota & Niang, Ibrahima & Baker, Lauren & Vidueira, Pablo, 2024. "Harvesting insights for transformation: Developing and testing a participatory food systems modeling framework in Southern Senegal's poultry system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    11. Shiell, Alan & Hawe, Penelope & Kavanagh, Shane, 2020. "Evidence suggests a need to rethink social capital and social capital interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    12. Michael C. Jackson, 2022. "Critical systems practice 3: Intervene—Flexibly executing a multimethodological intervention," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1014-1023, November.
    13. Watson Manduna & Roelien Goede & Lynette Drevin, 2022. "Incorporating various perspectives in using instant messages in teaching programming: A critical system thinking perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 947-961, September.
    14. A Boyd & T Geerling & W J Gregory & C Kagan & G Midgley & P Murray & M P Walsh, 2007. "Systemic evaluation: a participative, multi-method approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(10), pages 1306-1320, October.
    15. Rajneesh Chowdhury, 2023. "Systems thinking for creative and flexible practice," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 613-616, July.
    16. Shankar Sankaran & Rika Presier, 2021. "Systemic change towards sustainable development: Innovative and integrative approaches," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 579-582, October.
    17. Michael C. Jackson, 2021. "Critical systems practice 2: Produce—Constructing a multimethodological intervention strategy," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 594-609, October.
    18. Michael C. Jackson, 2023. "Rebooting the systems approach by applying the thinking of Bogdanov and the pragmatists," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 349-365, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:40:y:2023:i:4:p:617-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.