IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v34y2017i2p195-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiplying the Division of Labour: Functional Differentiation of the Next Key Variables in Management Research

Author

Listed:
  • Steffen Roth
  • Augusto Sales
  • Jari Kaivo-oja

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Steffen Roth & Augusto Sales & Jari Kaivo-oja, 2017. "Multiplying the Division of Labour: Functional Differentiation of the Next Key Variables in Management Research," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 195-207, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:34:y:2017:i:2:p:195-207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sres.2452
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Etzkowitz, Henry & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 109-123, February.
    2. Fabian Homberg & Katja Rost & Margit Osterloh, 2009. "Do synergies exist in related acquisitions? A meta-analysis of acquisition studies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 75-116, July.
    3. Inga Ivanova, 2014. "Quadruple Helix Systems and Symmetry: a Step Towards Helix Innovation System Classification," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(2), pages 357-369, June.
    4. Mastenbroek, Willem F G, 1990. "Information management, organizational design, and organizational theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 130-136, March.
    5. Steffen Roth, 2017. "From Added Values to Augmented Realities. Introducing the Special Issue of Management and Functional Differentiation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 131-138, March.
    6. Cuijpers, Maarten & Guenter, Hannes & Hussinger, Katrin, 2011. "Costs and benefits of inter-departmental innovation collaboration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 565-575, May.
    7. Perez-freije, Javier & Enkel, Ellen, 2007. "Creative Tension in the Innovation Process:: How to Support the Right Capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 11-24, February.
    8. Raju, P.S. & Lonial, Subhash C. & Crum, Michael D., 2011. "Market orientation in the context of SMEs: A conceptual framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1320-1326.
    9. Tienari, Janne, 2000. "Gender segregation in the making of a merger," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 111-144, June.
    10. Eric Van den Steen, 2010. "Culture Clash: The Costs and Benefits of Homogeneity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(10), pages 1718-1738, October.
    11. Fowler, Alan, 2003. "Systems modelling, simulation, and the dynamics of strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 135-144, February.
    12. Moon, Byeong-Joon, 2013. "Antecedents and outcomes of strategic thinking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1698-1708.
    13. Jari Kaivo-oja, 2002. "Social and ecological destruction in the first class: a plausible social development scenario," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(1), pages 63-66.
    14. Cooper, Marjorie J. & Gwin, Carol F. & Wakefield, Kirk L., 2008. "Cross-functional interface and disruption in CRM projects: Is marketing from Venus and information systems from Mars?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 292-299, April.
    15. Loet Leydesdorff & Henry Etzkowitz, 1996. "Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 279-286, October.
    16. Rémi Barr, 2001. "The Agora model of innovation systems: S&T indicators for a democratic knowledge society," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 13-18, April.
    17. Tekleab, Amanuel G. & Karaca, Ayse & Quigley, Narda R. & Tsang, Eric W.K., 2016. "Re-examining the functional diversity–performance relationship: The roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3500-3507.
    18. Loet Leydesdorff, 2012. "The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 3(1), pages 25-35, March.
    19. Valentinov, Vladislav & Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo, 2015. "Nonprofit organizations, institutional economics, and systems thinking," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 491-501.
    20. Pénin, Julien, 2012. "Strategic uses of patents in markets for technology: A story of fabless firms, brokers and trolls," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 633-641.
    21. Wind, Yoram (Jerry), 2005. "Marketing as an engine of business growth: a cross-functional perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(7), pages 863-873, July.
    22. Wolfgang Rennison, Betina, 2007. "Cash, codes and complexity: New adventures in the public management of pay scales," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 146-167, June.
    23. Crittenden, Victoria L. & Woodside, Arch G., 2006. "Mapping strategic decision-making in cross-functional contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 360-364, March.
    24. Hernes, Tor & Weik, Elke, 2007. "Organization as process: Drawing a line between endogenous and exogenous views," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 251-264, September.
    25. Ragatz, Gary L. & Handfield, Robert B. & Petersen, Kenneth J., 2002. "Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 389-400, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Constantine Iliopoulos & Vladislav Valentinov, 2018. "Member Heterogeneity in Agricultural Cooperatives: A Systems-Theoretic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. José Antonio Plaza‐Úbeda & Miguel Pérez‐Valls & José Joaquín Céspedes‐Lorente & Belén Payán‐Sánchez, 2020. "The contribution of systems theory to sustainability in degrowth contexts: The role of subsystems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 68-81, January.
    3. Steffen Roth & Vladislav Valentinov & Markus Heidingsfelder & Miguel Pérez-Valls, 2020. "CSR Beyond Economy and Society: A Post-capitalist Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 411-423, September.
    4. Michael Grothe‐Hammer & Anders la Cour, 2020. "Organization and membership: Introduction to the Special Issue," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 419-424, May.
    5. Taras Gagalyuk & Vladislav Valentinov & Franziska Schaft, 2018. "The Corporate Social Responsibility of Ukrainian Agroholdings: the Stakeholder Approach Revisited," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 675-698, December.
    6. Iliopoulos, Constantine & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2018. "Member heterogeneity in agricultural cooperatives: A systems-theoretic perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Young Hoon & Kim, YoungJun, 2016. "Analyzing interaction in R&D networks using the Triple Helix method: Evidence from industrial R&D programs in Korean government," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 93-105.
    2. Francesco Campanella & Maria Rosaria Della Peruta & Stefano Bresciani & Luca Dezi, 2017. "Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 267-284, April.
    3. Jiaofeng Pan & Jianxin Guo, 2022. "Innovative Collaboration and Acceleration: an Integrated Framework Based on Knowledge Transfer and Triple Helix," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3223-3247, December.
    4. Laxmi Prasad Pant, 2019. "Responsible innovation through conscious contestation at the interface of agricultural science, policy, and civil society," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 183-197, June.
    5. Hernández-Trasobares, Alejandro & Murillo-Luna, Josefina L., 2020. "The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Brinkhoff, Sascha & Kitzmann, Robert, 2014. "Urban dreams and economic realities – Areas of innovation between the demands of the knowledge society and the requirements of innovative industries," EconStor Conference Papers 233821, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Thai Thi Minh & Carsten Nico Hjotrsø, 2015. "Relational dynamics in the multi-helices knowledge production system: A new institutionalism perspective," Globelics Working Paper Series 2015-08, Globelics - Global Network for Economics of Learning, Innovation, and Competence Building Systems, Aalborg University, Department of Business and Management.
    8. Xiaoran Zheng & Yuzhuo Cai, 2022. "Transforming Innovation Systems into Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Public Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Li, Yin & Arora, Sanjay & Youtie, Jan & Shapira, Philip, 2018. "Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 76, pages 3-14.
    10. Paul Jackson & Reza Kiani Mavi & Yuliani Suseno & Craig Standing, 2018. "University–industry collaboration within the triple helix of innovation: The importance of mutuality," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 553-564.
    11. Devrim Goktepe, 2003. "The Triple Helix as a model to analyze Israeli Magnet Program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 219-239, October.
    12. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2021. "Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 2050-2082, December.
    13. Russell, Martha G. & Smorodinskaya, Nataliya V., 2018. "Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 114-131.
    14. Loet Leydesdorff & Han Woo Park & Balazs Lengyel, 2014. "A routine for measuring synergy in university–industry–government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 27-35, April.
    15. Zafeirios Thomakis & Irene Daskalopoulou, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Views and Rural Entrepreneurial Potential: Evidence from Greece," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1611-1634, June.
    16. Farshad Momeni & Ali Arab Mazar Yazdi & Seyed Mohammad Sajjad Najafi, 2019. "Changing economic systems and institutional dimensions of the Triple Helix model," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Lorenzo Compagnucci & Francesca Spigarelli, 2018. "Fostering Cross-Sector Collaboration to Promote Innovation in the Water Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Leonel Corona-Treviño, 2016. "Entrepreneurship in an open national innovation system (ONIS): a proposal for Mexico," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Noriko Yoda & Kenichi Kuwashima, 2020. "Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1120-1144, September.
    20. Valbona Gjini & Lucian Koprencka, 2018. "Relationship Between Economic Factors and Non-Performing Loans- the Case of Albania," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, ejes_v4_i.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:34:y:2017:i:2:p:195-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.