IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v95y2014i2p380-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservative Christians and Support for Transracial Adoption as an Alternative to Abortion

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel L. Perry

Abstract

type="main"> This study examines whether support for transracial adoption (TRA) among evangelical Protestants and Catholics is uniquely tied to their cultural and political opposition to abortion. Mainline Protestants, persons of other religious faiths, and the religiously unaffiliated are used as comparison groups, and support for same-sex adoption is used as a comparison issue. Data are taken from the 2005 Baylor Religion Survey. I estimate logistic regression models to examine the link between support for TRA and abortion attitudes across all five groups considered, net of relevant sociodemographic and ideological factors. For evangelicals and Catholics, opposition to abortion under any circumstance has a positive net effect on their support for TRA. However, opposition to abortion does not predict support for TRA among mainline Protestants, adherents to other religions, or the unaffiliated. Support for same-sex adoption is a strong predictor of support for TRA across all groups. An interesting paradox is thus observed in that evangelicals and Catholics who support TRA are more socially progressive on most other issues (younger, more racially tolerant, support same-sex adoption), except in their views toward abortion. On this issue, they are more conservative.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel L. Perry, 2014. "Conservative Christians and Support for Transracial Adoption as an Alternative to Abortion," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(2), pages 380-392, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:95:y:2014:i:2:p:380-392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ssqu.12047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braunsberger, Karin & Wybenga, Hans & Gates, Roger, 2007. "A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 758-764, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nunkoo, Robin & Smith, Stephen L.J., 2013. "Political economy of tourism: Trust in government actors, political support, and their determinants," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 120-132.
    2. Tachizawa, Elcio M. & Gimenez, Cristina, 2010. "Supply flexibility strategies in Spanish firms: Results from a survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 214-224, March.
    3. Magdalena Smyk & Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde, 2021. "A Cautionary Note on the Reliability of the Online Survey Data: The Case of Wage Indicator," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(1), pages 429-464, February.
    4. Schoefer, Klaus & Wäppling, Anders & Heirati, Nima & Blut, Markus, 2019. "The moderating effect of cultural value orientations on behavioral responses to dissatisfactory service experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 247-256.
    5. Raphaëlle Butori & Béatrice Parguel, 2010. "When students give biased responses to researchers: An exploration of traditional paper vs. computerized self-administration," Post-Print halshs-00636231, HAL.
    6. Hung, Kam & Law, Rob, 2011. "An overview of Internet-based surveys in hospitality and tourism journals," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 717-724.
    7. Bo-Hyun Seong & Chang-Yu Hong, 2022. "When It Comes to Screen Golf and Baseball, What Do Participants Think?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Verhagen, T., 2008. "Investigating the impact of C2C electronic marketplace quality on trust," Serie Research Memoranda 0008, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    9. Casper Ferm, Lars-Erik & Thaichon, Park, 2021. "Customer pre-participatory social media drivers and their influence on attitudinal loyalty within the retail banking industry: A multi-group analysis utilizing social exchange theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    10. Suzanne M. Leland & Dustin C. Read & Michael Wittry, 2015. "Analyzing the Perceived Benefits of LEED-Certified and Energy Star–Certified Buildings in the Realm of Local Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(4), pages 363-375, November.
    11. Bo-Hyun Seong & Chang-Yu Hong, 2021. "Moderating Effect of Demographic Variables by Analyzing the Motivation and Satisfaction of Visitors to the Former Presidential Vacation Villa: Case Study of Cheongnam-Dae, South Korea," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Cauane Blumenberg & Aluísio J. D. Barros, 2018. "Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(6), pages 765-773, July.
    13. Smith, Scott M. & Roster, Catherine A. & Golden, Linda L. & Albaum, Gerald S., 2016. "A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3139-3148.
    14. Antonio Dottore & Suleiman K. Kassicieh, 2017. "Predicting Future Technopreneurs Among Inventors," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Daniel HOMOCIANU & Dinu AIRINEI, 2015. "Some Behavioral Considerations on the GPS4GEF Cloud-Based Generator of Evaluation Forms with Automatic Feedback and References to Interactive Support Content," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 19-31.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:95:y:2014:i:2:p:380-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.