IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i4p980-995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Winners and losers in U.S.–China trade disputes: A dynamic compositional analysis of foreign direct investment

Author

Listed:
  • Yoo Sun Jung
  • Yohan Park

Abstract

Background The trade conflicts between the United States and China have significantly disrupted global trade and economic growth. In today's globalized economy where the production of goods and services spans across multiple nations, these disputes have far‐reaching consequences that extend beyond the involved parties and impact the broader global economy. Objective We examine the effects of the U.S.‐China trade disputes on multinational investment patterns in China and Southeast Asia. Methods Using a dynamic compositional approach, we analyze data on firm‐level greenfield foreign direct investment. Results We observe European firms increasing their investments in China to enhance market penetration, while American firms are withdrawing, redirecting their focus toward Southeast Asia to mitigate dependence on the Chinese market. Conclusion This shift highlights broader international business strategy trends amid geopolitical and economic changes. The results indicate significant transformations in global supply chains, shedding light on the extensive effects of U.S.–China trade tensions on global economic equilibrium and how these tensions are reshaping international investment and supply chain dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoo Sun Jung & Yohan Park, 2024. "Winners and losers in U.S.–China trade disputes: A dynamic compositional analysis of foreign direct investment," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(4), pages 980-995, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:980-995
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13362
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13362?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:980-995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.