IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v41y2024i1p160-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving cross‐sectoral policy integration in multilevel structures—Loosely coupled coordination of “energy transition” in the German “Bundesrat”

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Behnke
  • Yvonne Hegele

Abstract

The big policy challenges of our times are complex problems cutting across policy sectors and levels of government. To answer the question how cross‐sectoral policy coordination in multilevel structures can be achieved, we argue in line with policy integration and multilevel governance scholarship that “loosely coupled” institutions create the interdependency necessary to secure complex coordination. This argument is substantiated empirically by investigating coordination of energy transition in the German Bundesrat. Expectations are derived on how loosely coupled institutions promote coordination. They are tested using a mix of empirical data. It can be shown that loosely coupled institutions indeed enable coordination by linking powers across multiple dimensions, creating incentives for cross‐sectoral communication, using personal ties in negotiations to bridge different institutional backgrounds, and sequencing the decision process to allow strategic shifts between coordination dimensions. Those mechanisms may not guarantee the best possible result, but they provide a satisfactory solution at least. Los grandes desafíos políticos de nuestro tiempo son problemas complejos que atraviesan sectores políticos y niveles de gobierno. Para responder a la pregunta de cómo se puede lograr la coordinación de políticas intersectoriales en estructuras multinivel, argumentamos en línea con la integración de políticas y la erudición de gobernanza multinivel que las instituciones ‘ligeramente acopladas’ crean la interdependencia necesaria para asegurar una coordinación compleja. Este argumento se fundamenta empíricamente investigando la coordinación de la transición energética en el Bundesrat alemán. Las expectativas se derivan de cómo las instituciones débilmente acopladas promueven la coordinación. Se prueban utilizando una combinación de datos empíricos. Se puede demostrar que las instituciones débilmente acopladas de hecho permiten la coordinación al: vincular poderes a través de múltiples dimensiones; crear incentivos para la comunicación intersectorial; utilizar lazos personales en las negociaciones para unir diferentes antecedentes institucionales; y secuenciar el proceso de decisión para permitir cambios estratégicos entre las dimensiones de coordinación. Esos mecanismos pueden no garantizar el mejor resultado posible, pero proporcionan al menos una solución satisfactoria. 当下时代的重大政策挑战是一系列跨越政策部门和各级政府的复杂问题。为了回答如何在多层次结构中实现跨部门政策协调这一问题,我们根据政策整合和多层次治理文献来提出论点,认为“松散耦合”的制度创造了复杂协调所必需的相互依存关系。通过调查德国联邦参议院的能源转型协调,从实证上证明了该论点。根据松散耦合的制度如何推动协调,提出了一系列期望。使用混合的实证数据对期望进行测试。可以证明,松散耦合的制度确实能通过以下方式实现协调:将多个维度的权力联系起来;为跨部门传播创造激励;在协商中利用个人关系连接不同的制度背景;对决策过程进行排序,以允许协调维度之间的战略转变。这些机制可能无法保证最好的结果,但它们至少提供了一个令人满意的解决方案。

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Behnke & Yvonne Hegele, 2024. "Achieving cross‐sectoral policy integration in multilevel structures—Loosely coupled coordination of “energy transition” in the German “Bundesrat”," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(1), pages 160-183, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:41:y:2024:i:1:p:160-183
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jale Tosun & Achim Lang, 2017. "Policy integration: mapping the different concepts," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 553-570, November.
    2. Patrick Finke & Markus M Müller & Antonios Souris & Roland Sturm, 2020. "Representation of Partisan, Territorial, and Institutional Interests in Second Chambers: Evidence from the German Bundesrat and its Committees," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 50(2), pages 213-236.
    3. Yvonne Hegele, 2018. "Multidimensional Interests in Horizontal Intergovernmental Coordination: The Case of the German Bundesrat," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 48(2), pages 244-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekaterina Domorenok & Paolo Graziano & Laura Polverari, 2021. "Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy [Joined-up Government in the Western World in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature rev," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 58-78.
    2. Israel Solorio & Jorge Guzmán & Ixchel Guzmán, 2023. "Participatory decision-making in the policy integration process: indigenous consultation and sustainable development in Mexico," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 115-140, March.
    3. Zacharoula Kyriazi & Leonor Ribeiro de Almeida & Agnès Marhadour & Christina Kelly & Wesley Flannery & Arantza Murillas-Maza & Régis Kalaydjian & Desiree Farrell & Liam M. Carr & Daniel Norton & Steph, 2023. "Conceptualising Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming as an Enabler of Regional Sustainable Blue Growth: The Case of the European Atlantic Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Martin Ferry, 2021. "Pulling things together: regional policy coordination approaches and drivers in Europe [‘PiS wchodzi w buty marszałków. Cel? Miliony z funduszy europejskich’]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 37-57.
    5. Daniel Kefeli & Karen M. Siegel & Lucía Pittaluga & Thomas Dietz, 2023. "Environmental policy integration in a newly established natural resource-based sector: the role of advocacy coalitions and contrasting conceptions of sustainability," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 69-93, March.
    6. Heiner Lüpke & Lucas Leopold & Jale Tosun, 2023. "Institutional coordination arrangements as elements of policy design spaces: insights from climate policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 49-68, March.
    7. Sébastien Lambelet, 2023. "Unintended policy integration through entrepreneurship at the implementation stage," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 161-189, March.
    8. Philipp Trein & Manuel Fischer & Martino Maggetti & Francesco Sarti, 2023. "Empirical research on policy integration: a review and new directions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 29-48, March.
    9. Martino Maggetti & Philipp Trein, 2022. "Policy integration, problem-solving, and the coronavirus disease crisis: lessons for policy design [Neglected challenges to evidence-based policy-making: The problem of policy accumulation]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(1), pages 53-67.
    10. Guillermo M. Cejudo & Philipp Trein, 2023. "Policy integration as a political process," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 3-8, March.
    11. Martino Maggetti & Philipp Trein, 2021. "More is less: Partisan ideology, changes of government, and policy integration reforms in the UK [“Neglected Challenges to Evidence-Based Policy-Making: The Problem of Policy Accumulation.”]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 79-98.
    12. Vogeler, Colette S. & Parth, Anne-Marie, 2024. "An elephant in the room? Explaining agenda-setting in antimicrobial resistance policies in 30 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    13. Ueli Reber & Karin Ingold & Manuel Fischer, 2023. "The role of actors' issue and sector specialization for policy integration in the parliamentary arena: an analysis of Swiss biodiversity policy using text as data," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 95-114, March.
    14. Guillermo M. Cejudo & Philipp Trein, 2023. "Pathways to policy integration: a subsystem approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 9-27, March.
    15. Gritsenko, Daria, 2024. "Advancing UN digital cooperation: Lessons from environmental policy and governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Paul Cisneros, 2023. "How do courts contribute to policy integration? A comparative study of policy integration processes in Colombia, Ecuador, and Guatemala," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(3), pages 613-632, September.
    17. Sarker, Pradip Kumar & Fischer, Richard & Tamayo, Fabian & Navarrete, Bolier Torres & Günter, Sven, 2022. "Analyzing forest policy mixes based on the coherence of policies and the consistency of legislative policy instruments: A case study from Ecuador," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Francesco S. Montesano & Frank Biermann & Agni Kalfagianni & Marjanneke J. Vijge, 2023. "Balancing or prioritising for sustainable development? Perceptions of sustainability integration among professionals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1921-1936, June.
    19. Ana Tarrafa Silva & Ana Pereira Roders & Teresa Cunha Ferreira & Ivan Nevzgodin, 2023. "Critical Analysis of Policy Integration Degrees between Heritage Conservation and Spatial Planning in Amsterdam and Ballarat," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Kai Schulze & Jonas J. Schoenefeld, 2023. "Measuring climate change adaptation policy output: Toward a two‐dimensional approach," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(6), pages 1058-1092, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:41:y:2024:i:1:p:160-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.