IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16762-d1298746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualising Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming as an Enabler of Regional Sustainable Blue Growth: The Case of the European Atlantic Area

Author

Listed:
  • Zacharoula Kyriazi

    (MaREI, The SFI Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, P43C573 Ringaskiddy, Ireland
    Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal)

  • Leonor Ribeiro de Almeida

    (Portuguese Institute for Sea and Atmosphere, 1749-077 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Agnès Marhadour

    (Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal)

  • Christina Kelly

    (School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK)

  • Wesley Flannery

    (School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK)

  • Arantza Murillas-Maza

    (AZTI—Ciencia y Tecnología Marina y Alimentaria—Sustainable Fisheries Management, 48395 Sukarrieta, Spain)

  • Régis Kalaydjian

    (French Institute for Ocean Science-Ifremer, 29280 Plouzané, France)

  • Desiree Farrell

    (School of Geography, Archaeology & Irish Studies, National University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Liam M. Carr

    (School of Geography, Archaeology & Irish Studies, National University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Daniel Norton

    (Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit (SEMRU), National University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Stephen Hynes

    (Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit (SEMRU), National University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

Abstract

After recognizing the importance of marine and coastal resources and the use of marine space for economic growth, the European Union (EU) created and implemented a long-term Blue Economy (BE) strategy that supports the development of traditional and emerging marine and maritime sectors, aiming at the enhancement of Blue Growth (BG). However, despite the existence of a robust policy framework that supports the expansion of BE sectors at both an EU Sea Basin and state level, scholars have been sceptical as to whether the pursuit of BG adequately addresses the challenges that usually come with economic development, including those of climate change and marine biodiversity loss. Various frameworks for integrating sectoral goals with each other and with environmental goals that could facilitate the transition towards Sustainable Blue Growth (SBG) already exist and have been suggested and promoted by the European Commission, such as Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) and Marine Spatial Planning (MSP). They require the consideration of marine ecosystems and biodiversity and their protection as one of the BE sectors to be integrated via planning and management, which in turn requires the estimation of the value of ecosystem services and the spatial implications thereof. Nonetheless, there is little evidence or real-world examples on whether and how ecosystems, and within them coastal and marine biodiversity, are actually integrated (i.e., mainstreamed) when developing sectoral policies and planning and implementing economic activities at sea at various scales, i.e., local, national, and regional, and what the necessary steps and actions are that would facilitate such mainstreaming. By seeking evidence in EU and Atlantic Arc (AA) member states’ sectoral policies on marine tourism, ports and shipping, marine renewable energy, and fisheries and aquaculture (as promoted by the Atlantic Maritime Strategy and its corresponding action plans) and in the outcomes of the Interreg Atlantic Funded Research Project MOSES (aiming at valuating a Sustainable Blue Economy at the national and regional scale of the EU AA), the present article focused on understanding if and how marine biodiversity is taken into consideration by EU and AA BE and/or BG policies, strategies, and sectoral developments. Τhe selected sectoral policies demonstrate a good uptake of marine-ecosystem- and biodiversity-related challenges; however, at both the EU and the AA member-state level, it is unclear whether and how marine ecosystems and biodiversity are addressed as a separate BE sector. As such, we argue why and how Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming (MBM) could address this gap, and hence it could contribute to planning, implementing, and managing maritime economic activities towards SBG at the Sea Basin level. This is demonstrated by illustrating the central role of MBM in enabling (and being further enabled by) the above integrative frameworks (i.e., MSP and EBM) and by presenting the key elements and actions required for such facilitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zacharoula Kyriazi & Leonor Ribeiro de Almeida & Agnès Marhadour & Christina Kelly & Wesley Flannery & Arantza Murillas-Maza & Régis Kalaydjian & Desiree Farrell & Liam M. Carr & Daniel Norton & Steph, 2023. "Conceptualising Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming as an Enabler of Regional Sustainable Blue Growth: The Case of the European Atlantic Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16762-:d:1298746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyriazi, Zacharoula & Maes, Frank & Rabaut, Marijn & Vincx, Magda & Degraer, Steven, 2013. "The integration of nature conservation into the marine spatial planning process," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 133-139.
    2. Spangenberg, Joachim H., 2007. "Biodiversity pressure and the driving forces behind," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 146-158, February.
    3. Jale Tosun & Achim Lang, 2017. "Policy integration: mapping the different concepts," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 553-570, November.
    4. , European Marine Board & Austen, Melanie & Andersen, Peder & Armstrong, Claire & Döring, Ralf & Hynes, Stephen & Levrel, Harald & Oinonen, Soile & Ressurreição, Adriana & Coopman, Joke, 2019. "Valuing Marine Ecosystems - Taking into account the value of ecosystem benefits in the Blue Economy," MarXiv vy3kp, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekaterina Domorenok & Paolo Graziano & Laura Polverari, 2021. "Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy [Joined-up Government in the Western World in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature rev," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 58-78.
    2. Israel Solorio & Jorge Guzmán & Ixchel Guzmán, 2023. "Participatory decision-making in the policy integration process: indigenous consultation and sustainable development in Mexico," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 115-140, March.
    3. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H. & O'Connor, Martin, 2009. "An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 12-23, November.
    4. Chung Nguyen Hoang, 2021. "The Effects of Economic Integration on CO2 Emission: A View from Institutions in Emerging Economies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 374-383.
    5. Frazão Santos, Catarina & Domingos, Tiago & Ferreira, Maria Adelaide & Orbach, Michael & Andrade, Francisco, 2014. "How sustainable is sustainable marine spatial planning? Part I—Linking the concepts," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 59-65.
    6. Adam D. Hughes & George Charalambides & Sofia C. Franco & Georgina Robinson & Paul Tett, 2022. "Blue Nitrogen: A Nature-Based Solution in the Blue Economy as a Tool to Manage Terrestrial Nutrient Neutrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-8, August.
    7. Haberl, Helmut & Gaube, Veronika & Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo & Krauze, Kinga & Neuner, Angelika & Peterseil, Johannes & Plutzar, Christoph & Singh, Simron J. & Vadineanu, Angheluta, 2009. "Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressures and impacts. A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1797-1812, April.
    8. Andreas E. Fousteris & Eleni A. Didaskalou & Markos-Marios H. Tsogas & Dimitrios A. Georgakellos, 2018. "The Environmental Strategy of Businesses as an Option under Recession in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Martin Ferry, 2021. "Pulling things together: regional policy coordination approaches and drivers in Europe [‘PiS wchodzi w buty marszałków. Cel? Miliony z funduszy europejskich’]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 37-57.
    10. Mathilde Salin & Katie Kedward & Nepomuk Dunz, 2024. "Assessing Integrated Assessment Models for Building Global Nature-Economy Scenarios," Working papers 959, Banque de France.
    11. Maxim, Laura & Spangenberg, Joachim H., 2009. "Driving forces of chemical risks for the European biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 43-54, November.
    12. Daniel Kefeli & Karen M. Siegel & Lucía Pittaluga & Thomas Dietz, 2023. "Environmental policy integration in a newly established natural resource-based sector: the role of advocacy coalitions and contrasting conceptions of sustainability," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 69-93, March.
    13. Heiner Lüpke & Lucas Leopold & Jale Tosun, 2023. "Institutional coordination arrangements as elements of policy design spaces: insights from climate policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 49-68, March.
    14. Thomas Wiedmann & John Barrett, 2010. "A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(6), pages 1-49, June.
    15. Rodríguez-Labajos, Beatriz & Binimelis, Rosa & Monterroso, Iliana, 2009. "Multi-level driving forces of biological invasions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 63-75, November.
    16. , European Marine Board & Boero, Ferdinando & Cummins, Valerie & Gault, Jeremy & Huse, Geir & Philippart, Catharina & Schneider, Ralph & Besiktepe, Sukru & Boeuf, Gilles & Coll, Marta, 2019. "Navigating the Future V: Marine Science for a Sustainable Future," MarXiv vps62, Center for Open Science.
    17. Katsanevakis, Stelios & Levin, Noam & Coll, Marta & Giakoumi, Sylvaine & Shkedi, Daniel & Mackelworth, Peter & Levy, Ran & Velegrakis, Adonis & Koutsoubas, Drosos & Caric, Hrvoje & Brokovich, Eran & Ö, 2015. "Marine conservation challenges in an era of economic crisis and geopolitical instability: The case of the Mediterranean Sea," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 31-39.
    18. Sébastien Lambelet, 2023. "Unintended policy integration through entrepreneurship at the implementation stage," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 161-189, March.
    19. Philipp Trein & Manuel Fischer & Martino Maggetti & Francesco Sarti, 2023. "Empirical research on policy integration: a review and new directions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 29-48, March.
    20. Chalkiadakis, Charis & Drakou, Evangelia G. & Kraak, Menno-Jan, 2022. "Ecosystem service flows: A systematic literature review of marine systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16762-:d:1298746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.