IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/mathfi/v28y2018i4p1020-1060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk management with weighted VaR

Author

Listed:
  • Pengyu Wei

Abstract

This article studies the optimal portfolio selection of expected utility‐maximizing investors who must also manage their market‐risk exposures. The risk is measured by a so‐called weighted value‐at‐risk (WVaR) risk measure, which is a generalization of both value‐at‐risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES). The feasibility, well‐posedness, and existence of the optimal solution are examined. We obtain the optimal solution (when it exists) and show how risk measures change asset allocation patterns. In particular, we characterize three classes of risk measures: the first class will lead to models that do not admit an optimal solution, the second class can give rise to endogenous portfolio insurance, and the third class, which includes VaR and ES, two popular regulatory risk measures, will allow economic agents to engage in “regulatory capital arbitrage,” incurring larger losses when losses occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengyu Wei, 2018. "Risk management with weighted VaR," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1020-1060, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:28:y:2018:i:4:p:1020-1060
    DOI: 10.1111/mafi.12160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12160
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/mafi.12160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tongyao Wang & Qitong Pan & Weiping Wu & Jianjun Gao & Ke Zhou, 2024. "Dynamic Mean–Variance Portfolio Optimization with Value-at-Risk Constraint in Continuous Time," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Jing Peng & Pengyu Wei & Zuo Quan Xu, 2022. "Relative growth rate optimization under behavioral criterion," Papers 2211.05402, arXiv.org.
    3. Fangyuan Zhang, 2023. "Non-concave portfolio optimization with average value-at-risk," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 3, March.
    4. Huang, Zhenzhen & Wei, Pengyu & Weng, Chengguo, 2024. "Tail mean-variance portfolio selection with estimation risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 218-234.
    5. Zuo Quan Xu, 2021. "Moral-hazard-free insurance: mean-variance premium principle and rank-dependent utility theory," Papers 2108.06940, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    6. Jianming Xia, 2021. "Optimal Investment with Risk Controlled by Weighted Entropic Risk Measures," Papers 2112.02284, arXiv.org.
    7. Jianming Xia, 2023. "Benchmark Beating with the Increasing Convex Order," Papers 2311.01692, arXiv.org.
    8. Bernard, Carole & Cui, Xuecan, 2023. "Impact of systemic risk regulation on optimal policies and asset prices," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. An Chen & Mitja Stadje & Fangyuan Zhang, 2020. "On the equivalence between Value-at-Risk- and Expected Shortfall-based risk measures in non-concave optimization," Papers 2002.02229, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    10. Pengyu Wei & Zuo Quan Xu, 2021. "Dynamic growth-optimum portfolio choice under risk control," Papers 2112.14451, arXiv.org.
    11. Hui Mi & Zuo Quan Xu & Dongfang Yang, 2023. "Optimal Management of DC Pension Plan with Inflation Risk and Tail VaR Constraint," Papers 2309.01936, arXiv.org.
    12. Bi, Xiuchun & Cui, Zhenyu & Fan, Jiacheng & Yuan, Lvning & Zhang, Shuguang, 2023. "Optimal investment problem under behavioral setting: A Lagrange duality perspective," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Zongxia Liang & Yang Liu & Litian Zhang, 2021. "A Framework of State-dependent Utility Optimization with General Benchmarks," Papers 2101.06675, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:28:y:2018:i:4:p:1020-1060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0960-1627 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.