IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2211.05402.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relative growth rate optimization under behavioral criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Peng
  • Pengyu Wei
  • Zuo Quan Xu

Abstract

This paper studies a continuous-time optimal portfolio selection problem in the complete market for a behavioral investor whose preference is of the prospect type with probability distortion. The investor concerns about the terminal relative growth rate (log-return) instead of absolute capital value. This model can be regarded as an extension of the classical growth optimal problem to the behavioral framework. It leads to a new type of M-shaped utility maximization problem under nonlinear Choquet expectation. Due to the presence of probability distortion, the classical stochastic control methods are not applicable. By the martingale method, concavification and quantile optimization techniques, we derive the closed-form optimal growth rate. We find that the benchmark growth rate has a significant impact on investment behaviors. Compared to Zhang et al where the same preference measure is applied to the terminal relative wealth, we find a new phenomenon when the investor's risk tolerance level is high and the market states are bad. In addition, our optimal wealth in every scenario is less sensitive to the pricing kernel and thus more stable than theirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Peng & Pengyu Wei & Zuo Quan Xu, 2022. "Relative growth rate optimization under behavioral criterion," Papers 2211.05402, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2211.05402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.05402
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zuo Quan Xu, 2016. "A Note On The Quantile Formulation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 589-601, July.
    2. Mehra, Rajnish & Prescott, Edward C., 1985. "The equity premium: A puzzle," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 145-161, March.
    3. Wakker, Peter P, 2001. "Testing and Characterizing Properties of Nonadditive Measures through Violations of the Sure-Thing Principle," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1039-1059, July.
    4. Pengyu Wei & Zuo Quan Xu, 2021. "Dynamic growth-optimum portfolio choice under risk control," Papers 2112.14451, arXiv.org.
    5. Arjan B. Berkelaar & Roy Kouwenberg & Thierry Post, 2004. "Optimal Portfolio Choice under Loss Aversion," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(4), pages 973-987, November.
    6. Jianming Xia & Xun Yu Zhou, 2016. "Arrow–Debreu Equilibria For Rank-Dependent Utilities," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 558-588, July.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2348 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. John Y. Campbell & John Cochrane, 1999. "Force of Habit: A Consumption-Based Explanation of Aggregate Stock Market Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(2), pages 205-251, April.
    10. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    11. Schmeidler, David, 1989. "Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 571-587, May.
    12. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "The Utility of Wealth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(2), pages 151-151.
    13. G. Carlier & R. Dana, 2008. "Two-persons efficient risk-sharing and equilibria for concave law-invariant utilities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 36(2), pages 189-223, August.
    14. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    15. Pengyu Wei, 2018. "Risk management with weighted VaR," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1020-1060, October.
    16. Erik Aurell & Roberto Baviera & Ola Hammarlid & Maurizio Serva & Angelo Vulpiani, 2000. "A General Methodology To Price And Hedge Derivatives In Incomplete Markets," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01), pages 1-24.
    17. Milton Friedman & L. J. Savage, 1948. "The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 279-279.
    18. Hanqing Jin & Zuo Quan Xu & Xun Yu Zhou, 2008. "A Convex Stochastic Optimization Problem Arising From Portfolio Selection," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 171-183, January.
    19. Hanqing Jin & Xun Yu Zhou, 2008. "Behavioral Portfolio Selection In Continuous Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 385-426, July.
    20. Zuo Quan Xu, 2013. "A New Characterization of Comonotonicity and its Application in Behavioral Finance," Papers 1311.6080, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2014.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zuo Quan Xu, 2018. "Pareto optimal moral-hazard-free insurance contracts in behavioral finance framework," Papers 1803.02546, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    2. Zuo Quan Xu, 2021. "Moral-hazard-free insurance: mean-variance premium principle and rank-dependent utility theory," Papers 2108.06940, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    3. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    4. Fangyuan Zhang, 2023. "Non-concave portfolio optimization with average value-at-risk," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 3, February.
    5. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Andreas Lichtenstern & Rudi Zagst, 2020. "Behavioral portfolio insurance strategies," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(4), pages 353-399, December.
    6. Bi, Xiuchun & Cui, Zhenyu & Fan, Jiacheng & Yuan, Lvning & Zhang, Shuguang, 2023. "Optimal investment problem under behavioral setting: A Lagrange duality perspective," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten & Meyer, Steffen & Hackethal, Andreas, 2019. "Taming models of prospect theory in the wild? Estimation of Vlcek and Hens (2011)," SAFE Working Paper Series 146, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2019.
    8. Wakker, Peter P. & Zank, Horst, 2002. "A simple preference foundation of cumulative prospect theory with power utility," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1253-1271, July.
    9. L. Rüschendorf & Steven Vanduffel, 2020. "On the construction of optimal payoffs," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(1), pages 129-153, June.
    10. Curatola, Giuliano, 2016. "Optimal consumption and portfolio choice with loss aversion," SAFE Working Paper Series 130, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    11. Valeri Zakamouline & Steen Koekebakker, 2009. "A Generalisation of the Mean†Variance Analysis," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(5), pages 934-970, November.
    12. Michał Lewandowski, 2017. "Prospect Theory Versus Expected Utility Theory: Assumptions, Predictions, Intuition and Modelling of Risk Attitudes," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 9(4), pages 275-321, December.
    13. Vicky Henderson, 2012. "Prospect Theory, Liquidation, and the Disposition Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 445-460, February.
    14. Zongxia Liang & Yang Liu & Litian Zhang, 2021. "A Framework of State-dependent Utility Optimization with General Benchmarks," Papers 2101.06675, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    15. Yunhong Li & Zuo Quan Xu & Xun Yu Zhou, 2023. "Robust utility maximization with intractable claims," Papers 2304.06938, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    16. van Bilsen, Servaas & Laeven, Roger J.A., 2020. "Dynamic consumption and portfolio choice under prospect theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 224-237.
    17. Hanqing Jin & Xun Yu Zhou, 2008. "Behavioral Portfolio Selection In Continuous Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 385-426, July.
    18. Horst Zank, 2010. "On probabilities and loss aversion," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 243-261, March.
    19. Chateauneuf, Alain & Eichberger, Jurgen & Grant, Simon, 2007. "Choice under uncertainty with the best and worst in mind: Neo-additive capacities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 538-567, November.
    20. Lovric, M. & Kaymak, U. & Spronk, J., 2008. "A Conceptual Model of Investor Behavior," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-030-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2211.05402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.