IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jrinsu/v75y2008i2p387-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CAPM and Option Pricing With Elliptically Contoured Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoud Hamada
  • Emiliano A. Valdez

Abstract

This article offers an alternative proof of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) when asset returns follow a multivariate elliptical distribution. Empirical studies continue to demonstrate the inappropriateness of the normality assumption for modeling asset returns. The class of elliptically contoured distributions, which includes the more familiar Normal distribution, provides flexibility in modeling the thickness of tails associated with the possibility that asset returns take extreme values with nonnegligible probabilities. As summarized in this article, this class preserves several properties of the Normal distribution. Within this framework, we prove a new version of Stein's lemma for this class of distributions and use this result to derive the CAPM when returns are elliptical. Furthermore, using the probability distortion function approach based on the dual utility theory of choice under uncertainty, we also derive an explicit form solution to call option prices when the underlying is log‐elliptically distributed. The Black–Scholes call option price is a special case of this general result when the underlying is log‐normally distributed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmoud Hamada & Emiliano A. Valdez, 2008. "CAPM and Option Pricing With Elliptically Contoured Distributions," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 75(2), pages 387-409, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:75:y:2008:i:2:p:387-409
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00265.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00265.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00265.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaari, Menahem E, 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 95-115, January.
    2. Wang, Shaun, 1996. "Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 71-92, May.
    3. Edward Frees, 1998. "Relative Importance of Risk Sources in Insurance Systems," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 34-49.
    4. Shaun Wang, 1998. "An Actuarial Index of the Right-Tail Risk," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 88-101.
    5. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    6. Cambanis, Stamatis & Huang, Steel & Simons, Gordon, 1981. "On the theory of elliptically contoured distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 368-385, September.
    7. Landsman, Zinoviy, 2002. "Credibility theory: a new view from the theory of second order optimal statistics," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 351-362, June.
    8. Rafael Schmidt, 2002. "Tail dependence for elliptically contoured distributions," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 55(2), pages 301-327, May.
    9. Mahmoud Hamada & Michael Sherris, 2003. "Contingent claim pricing using probability distortion operators: methods from insurance risk pricing and their relationship to financial theory," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 19-47.
    10. Landsman, Zinoviy & Makov, Udi E., 1999. "Sequential credibility evaluation for symmetric location claim distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 291-300, May.
    11. N. H. Bingham & Rudiger Kiesel, 2002. "Semi-parametric modelling in finance: theoretical foundations," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 241-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danilo Leal & Rodrigo Jiménez & Marco Riquelme & Víctor Leiva, 2023. "Elliptical Capital Asset Pricing Models: Formulation, Diagnostics, Case Study with Chilean Data, and Economic Rationale," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Fan, Jianqing & Han, Fang & Liu, Han & Vickers, Byron, 2016. "Robust inference of risks of large portfolios," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 298-308.
    3. Taras Bodnar & Mathias Lindholm & Erik Thorsén & Joanna Tyrcha, 2021. "Quantile-based optimal portfolio selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 299-324, July.
    4. Kume, Alfred & Hashorva, Enkelejd, 2012. "Calculation of Bayes premium for conditional elliptical risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 632-635.
    5. Polonik, Wolfgang & Yao, Qiwei, 2008. "Testing for multivariate volatility functions using minimum volume sets and inverse regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 151-162, November.
    6. Landsman, Zinoviy & Neslehová, Johanna, 2008. "Stein's Lemma for elliptical random vectors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(5), pages 912-927, May.
    7. Lundtofte, Frederik & Wilhelmsson, Anders, 2011. "Idiosyncratic Risk and Higher-Order Cumulants," Working Papers 2011:33, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    8. Nikolay Gospodinov & Raymond Kan & Cesare Robotti, 2012. "Analytical solution for the constrained Hansen-Jagannathan distance under multivariate ellipticity," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2012-18, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    9. Francisco Blasques & Andre Lucas & Erkki Silde, 2013. "Stationarity and Ergodicity Regions for Score Driven Dynamic Correlation Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-097/IV/DSF59, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Nikolay Gospodinov & Raymond Kan & Cesare Robotti, 2010. "On the Hansen-Jagannathan distance with a no-arbitrage constraint," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2010-04, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    11. SADEFO KAMDEM Jules, 2004. "VaR and ES for Linear Portfolios with mixture of Generalized Laplace Distributed Risk Factors," Risk and Insurance 0406001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Gospodinov, Nikolay & Kan, Raymond & Robotti, Cesare, 2016. "On the properties of the constrained Hansen–Jagannathan distance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 121-150.
    13. Hashorva, Enkelejd, 2005. "Extremes of asymptotically spherical and elliptical random vectors," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 285-302, June.
    14. Markus Huggenberger & Peter Albrecht, 2022. "Risk pooling and solvency regulation: A policyholder's perspective," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(4), pages 907-950, December.
    15. Jianqing Fan & Yuan Liao & Han Liu, 2016. "An overview of the estimation of large covariance and precision matrices," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 19(1), pages 1-32, February.
    16. Manuel Galea & David Cademartori & Roberto Curci & Alonso Molina, 2020. "Robust Inference in the Capital Asset Pricing Model Using the Multivariate t -distribution," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Chuancun Yin, 2019. "Stochastic ordering of Gini indexes for multivariate elliptical random variables," Papers 1908.01943, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Herdegen & Nazem Khan & Cosimo Munari, 2024. "Risk, utility and sensitivity to large losses," Papers 2405.12154, arXiv.org.
    2. Peng, Liang & Qi, Yongcheng & Wang, Ruodu & Yang, Jingping, 2012. "Jackknife empirical likelihood method for some risk measures and related quantities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 142-150.
    3. Furman, Edward & Landsman, Zinoviy, 2010. "Multivariate Tweedie distributions and some related capital-at-risk analyses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 351-361, April.
    4. Valdez, Emiliano A. & Chernih, Andrew, 2003. "Wang's capital allocation formula for elliptically contoured distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 517-532, December.
    5. Furman, Edward & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2008. "Weighted risk capital allocations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 263-269, October.
    6. López-Díaz, Miguel & Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2012. "On the Lp-metric between a probability distribution and its distortion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 257-264.
    7. Leitner, Johannes, 2005. "Dilatation monotonous Choquet integrals," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 994-1006, December.
    8. Maria Scutellà & Raffaella Recchia, 2013. "Robust portfolio asset allocation and risk measures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 145-169, April.
    9. Jaume Belles-Sampera & Montserrat Guillén & Miguel Santolino, 2013. "“The use of flexible quantile-based measures in risk assessment”," IREA Working Papers 201323, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Dec 2013.
    10. Alexis Bienvenüe & Didier Rullière, 2012. "Iterative Adjustment of Survival Functions by Composed Probability Distortions," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 37(2), pages 156-179, September.
    11. Chuancun Yin & Dan Zhu, 2015. "New class of distortion risk measures and their tail asymptotics with emphasis on VaR," Papers 1503.08586, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    12. Dilip B. Madan & Yazid M. Sharaiha, 2015. "Option overlay strategies," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 1175-1190, July.
    13. Wächter, Hans Peter & Mazzoni, Thomas, 2013. "Consistent modeling of risk averse behavior with spectral risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 487-495.
    14. Laeven, Roger J. A. & Goovaerts, Marc J., 2004. "An optimization approach to the dynamic allocation of economic capital," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 299-319, October.
    15. Debora Daniela Escobar & Georg Ch. Pflug, 2020. "The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 771-794, September.
    16. Silvana Pesenti & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2020. "Portfolio Optimisation within a Wasserstein Ball," Papers 2012.04500, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    17. Engsner, Hampus & Lindholm, Mathias & Lindskog, Filip, 2017. "Insurance valuation: A computable multi-period cost-of-capital approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 250-264.
    18. Ruodu Wang & Ričardas Zitikis, 2021. "An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1413-1429, March.
    19. Belles-Sampera, Jaume & Merigó, José M. & Guillén, Montserrat & Santolino, Miguel, 2013. "The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 411-420.
    20. Arthur Charpentier & Abder Oulidi, 2009. "Estimating allocations for Value-at-Risk portfolio optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(3), pages 395-410, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:75:y:2008:i:2:p:387-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ariaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.