IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v59y2021i5p1284-1302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ego versus Alter: Internal and External Perceptions of the EU's Role in Global Environmental Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Delreux
  • Frauke Pipart

Abstract

This paper compares how European and non‐European participants in international environmental negotiations perceive the EU's role in such negotiations. Three dimensions of the EU's role (environmental ambition, diplomatic activity and influence) are assessed in three UN‐wide environmental forums (the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions on chemicals, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the United Nations Environment Assembly). The paper presents original data collected through an online survey with 659 delegates who participated in the negotiations in the three forums in the period 2018–19. Comparing the ego perception of delegates from the EU with the alter view of delegates from non‐EU countries, the paper finds that the ego and alter perceptions of the EU's ambition, diplomatic activities and influence are largely similar. Both ego and alter see the EU as a highly ambitious, active and influential actor in global environmental negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Delreux & Frauke Pipart, 2021. "Ego versus Alter: Internal and External Perceptions of the EU's Role in Global Environmental Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1284-1302, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:59:y:2021:i:5:p:1284-1302
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13182
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2015. "The logic and workings of EU Cohesion Policy," Chapters, in: The Regional and Urban Policy of the European Union, chapter 3, pages 46-73, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Neve Gordon & Sharon Pardo, 2015. "Normative Power Europe meets the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 265-274, September.
    3. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i::p:969-998 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Glenda Quintini, 2015. "Working and learning: A diversity of patterns," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 169, OECD Publishing.
    5. Martijn L.P. Groenleer & Louise G. Van Schaik, 2007. "United We Stand? The European Union's International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 969-998, December.
    6. Stefaan Walgrave & Jeroen K. Joly, 2018. "Surveying individual political elites: a comparative three-country study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2221-2237, September.
    7. Planning Commission, 2015. "Working Group Report for XII PLAN - Railway Sector," Working Papers id:6526, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles F. Parker & Christer Karlsson, 2017. "The European Union as a global climate leader: confronting aspiration with evidence," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 445-461, August.
    2. Kai A. Konrad & Thomas R. Cusack, 2013. "Hanging Together or Being Hung Separately: The Strategic Power of Coalitions where Bargaining Occurs with Incomplete Information," CESifo Working Paper Series 4071, CESifo.
    3. Jan Orbie & Viktor Opsomer & Yentyl Williams & Sarah Delputte & Joren Verschaeve, 2021. "Shielded against risk? European donor co‐ordination in Palestine," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 703-720, September.
    4. Barbara Vis & Sjoerd Stolwijk, 2021. "Conducting quantitative studies with the participation of political elites: best practices for designing the study and soliciting the participation of political elites," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1281-1317, August.
    5. Konrad, Kai A. & Cusack, Thomas R., 2014. "Hanging Together or Hanged Separately: The Strategic Power of Coalitions where Bargaining Occurs with Incomplete Information," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58(5), pages 920-940.
    6. Anders Persson, 2017. "Shaping Discourse and Setting Examples: Normative Power Europe can Work in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1415-1431, November.
    7. Li Zhang, 2020. "Research progress in Chinese perceptions of the EU: a critical review and methodological reflection," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 17-34, March.
    8. Raghuram, G. & Udayakumar, Prashanth D., 2016. "Dedicated High Speed Rail Network in India: Issues in Development," IIMA Working Papers WP2016-03-58, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    9. Araceli Mateos & Margarita Corral, 2022. "Partial non-response in political elite studies: an approach to parliamentary elites in Latin America," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4089-4106, December.
    10. Jonas Tallberg & Soetkin Verhaegen, 2020. "The Legitimacy of International Institutions among Rising and Established Powers," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 115-126, October.
    11. Sciara, Gian-Claudia & Waxman, Andrew & Buchanan, Ross, 2024. "State legislator views on funding 21st century Transportation:Important problems, missed connections," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 206-218.
    12. Matias López, 2023. "The effect of sampling mode on response rate and bias in elite surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1303-1319, April.
    13. Assem Dandashly & Christos Kourtelis, 2020. "Classifying the Implementation of the EU's Normative Power in its Southern Neighbourhood: The Role of Local Actors," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1523-1539, November.
    14. Mauro Tebaldi & Marco Calaresu & Alberto Purpura, 2022. "The actorness of the President of the Republic in Italian foreign policy: a quantitative narrative analysis of two case studies (1999–2013)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2035-2061, August.
    15. Jason Smith, 2015. "Information equilibrium as an economic principle," Papers 1510.02435, arXiv.org.
    16. Sara Flisi, 2020. "Building up evidence on Work-Based Learning in VET - A reflection on sources for possible indicators or benchmarks on WBL," JRC Research Reports JRC118196, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Natalia Chaban & Alister Miskimmon & Ben O'Loughlin, 2017. "The EU's Peace and Security Narrative: Views from EU Strategic Partners in Asia," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1273-1289, November.
    18. Hila Zahavi & Gal Ariely, 2023. "External perceptions of the European Union in Israel—the role of norms and culture," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(4), pages 708-725, December.
    19. Marie Sophie Peffenköver, 2021. "Congruence-building on multiple fronts: Indian elite perceptions of EU rule promotion in India during the EU-India FTA negotiations (2007–2013)," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 149-165, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:59:y:2021:i:5:p:1284-1302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.