IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v45y2007i5p969-998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

United We Stand? The European Union's International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol

Author

Listed:
  • MARTIJN L.P. GROENLEER
  • LOUISE G. VAN SCHAIK

Abstract

In this article we examine the relationship between the institutional set‐up of the EU foreign policy‐making process and the international actorness of the EU in two particular cases: the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol. Whereas in both cases policy‐making is organized along intergovernmental lines, the EU has shown a relatively high degree of international actorness. We argue that this is the combined result of the considerable congruence of EU Member States' initial preferences and the social interactions between EU Member States, third countries and non‐state actors, through which preferences converged even further over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn L.P. Groenleer & Louise G. Van Schaik, 2007. "United We Stand? The European Union's International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 969-998, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i:5:p:969-998
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00756.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00756.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00756.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Charles F. Parker & Christer Karlsson, 2017. "The European Union as a global climate leader: confronting aspiration with evidence," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 445-461, August.
    2. Konrad, Kai A. & Cusack, Thomas R., 2013. "Hanging together or being hung separately: The strategic power of coalitions where bargaining occurs with incomplete information," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Tom Delreux & Frauke Pipart, 2021. "Ego versus Alter: Internal and External Perceptions of the EU's Role in Global Environmental Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1284-1302, September.
    4. Konrad, Kai A. & Cusack, Thomas R., 2014. "Hanging Together or Hanged Separately: The Strategic Power of Coalitions where Bargaining Occurs with Incomplete Information," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58(5), pages 920-940.
    5. Mauro Tebaldi & Marco Calaresu & Alberto Purpura, 2022. "The actorness of the President of the Republic in Italian foreign policy: a quantitative narrative analysis of two case studies (1999–2013)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2035-2061, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i:5:p:969-998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.