IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v91y2023i2p294-317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bootstrap Variance Procedure for the Generalised Regression Estimator

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Stefan
  • Michael A. Hidiroglou

Abstract

The generalised regression estimator (GREG) uses auxiliary data that are available from the finite population to improve the efficiency of the estimator of a total (mean). Estimators of the variance of GREG that have been proposed in the sampling literature include those based on Taylor linearisation and the jackknife techniques. Approximations based on Taylor expansions are reasonable for large samples. However, when the sample size is small, the Taylor‐based variance estimator has a large negative bias. The jackknife variance estimators overestimate the variance of GREG for small sample sizes. We offset these setbacks using a bootstrap procedure for estimating the variance of the GREG. The method uses a bootstrap population constructed with the model underlying the GREG estimator. Repeated samples are selected in the bootstrap population according to the design used to select the initial sample, and the variability associated with these bootstrap samples is used to compute the proposed bootstrap variance estimator. Simulations show that the new bootstrap estimator has a small bias for samples that have few observations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Stefan & Michael A. Hidiroglou, 2023. "A Bootstrap Variance Procedure for the Generalised Regression Estimator," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 294-317, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:91:y:2023:i:2:p:294-317
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12528
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S Chen & D Haziza & C Léger & Z Mashreghi, 2019. "Pseudo-population bootstrap methods for imputed survey data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 106(2), pages 369-384.
    2. Antal, Erika & Tillé, Yves, 2011. "A Direct Bootstrap Method for Complex Sampling Designs From a Finite Population," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 534-543.
    3. Jean‐François Beaumont & Zdenek Patak, 2012. "On the Generalized Bootstrap for Sample Surveys with Special Attention to Poisson Sampling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 80(1), pages 127-148, April.
    4. Gneiting, Tilmann & Raftery, Adrian E., 2007. "Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 359-378, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhonglei Wang & Liuhua Peng & Jae Kwang Kim, 2022. "Bootstrap inference for the finite population mean under complex sampling designs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1150-1174, September.
    2. Wayne A. Fuller & Jason C. Legg & Yang Li, 2017. "Bootstrap Variance Estimation for Rejective Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(520), pages 1562-1570, October.
    3. Sixia Chen & David Haziza & Zeinab Mashreghi, 2022. "A Comparison of Existing Bootstrap Algorithms for Multi-Stage Sampling Designs," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Pier Luigi Conti & Fulvia Mecatti, 2022. "Resampling under Complex Sampling Designs: Roots, Development and the Way Forward," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Żądło Tomasz, 2021. "On the generalisation of Quatember’s bootstrap," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 22(1), pages 163-178, March.
    6. Conti, Pier Luigi & Mecatti, Fulvia & Nicolussi, Federica, 2022. "Efficient unequal probability resampling from finite populations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Daniela Marella & Paola Vicard, 2022. "Bayesian network structural learning from complex survey data: a resampling based approach," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(4), pages 981-1013, October.
    8. Tomasz Żądło, 2021. "On the generalisation of Quatember's bootstrap," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 163-178, March.
    9. Azar, Pablo D. & Micali, Silvio, 2018. "Computational principal agent problems," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(2), May.
    10. Rubio, F.J. & Steel, M.F.J., 2011. "Inference for grouped data with a truncated skew-Laplace distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3218-3231, December.
    11. R de Fondeville & A C Davison, 2018. "High-dimensional peaks-over-threshold inference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 575-592.
    12. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    13. Finn Lindgren, 2015. "Comments on: Comparing and selecting spatial predictors using local criteria," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 35-44, March.
    14. Chuliá, Helena & Garrón, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    15. Laura Liu & Hyungsik Roger Moon & Frank Schorfheide, 2023. "Forecasting with a panel Tobit model," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 117-159, January.
    16. Armantier, Olivier & Treich, Nicolas, 2013. "Eliciting beliefs: Proper scoring rules, incentives, stakes and hedging," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 17-40.
    17. Peysakhovich, Alexander & Plagborg-Møller, Mikkel, 2012. "A note on proper scoring rules and risk aversion," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 357-361.
    18. Merkle, Edgar C. & Steyvers, Mark & Mellers, Barbara & Tetlock, Philip E., 2017. "A neglected dimension of good forecasting judgment: The questions we choose also matter," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 817-832.
    19. Remy Elbez & Jeff Folz & Alan McLean & Hernan Roca & Joseph M Labuz & Kenneth J Pienta & Shuichi Takayama & Raoul Kopelman, 2021. "Cell-morphodynamic phenotype classification with application to cancer metastasis using cell magnetorotation and machine-learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Angelica Gianfreda & Francesco Ravazzolo & Luca Rossini, 2020. "Large Time-Varying Volatility Models for Electricity Prices," Working Papers No 05/2020, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:91:y:2023:i:2:p:294-317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.