IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i3p748-762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solid waste optimization life‐cycle framework in Python (SwolfPy)

Author

Listed:
  • Mojtaba Sardarmehni
  • Pedro H. Chagas Anchieta
  • James W. Levis

Abstract

This paper describes a novel open‐source life‐cycle optimization framework for solid waste and sustainable materials management applications named solid waste optimization life‐cycle framework in Python (SwolfPy). The current version includes life‐cycle models for landfills, mass burn waste‐to‐energy, gasification, centralized composting, home composting, anaerobic digestion, material recovery facilities, refuse‐derived fuel facilities, material recycling, transfer stations, and single‐family collection. Compared to existing frameworks, SwolfPy streamlines data input/output processes, improves model integration and modularity, provides a wide variety of data visualization and customization, speeds up uncertainty analysis and optimization, and has a user‐friendly graphical user interface (GUI). SwolfPy's GUI allows users to define solid waste management networks and scenarios as well as perform comparative life cycle assessments (LCAs), contribution analyses, uncertainty analyses, and optimization. SwolfPy is implemented in Python using Pandas, NumPy, and SciPy for computational tasks, PySide2 for creating the GUI, and Brightway2 for storing life‐cycle inventory data and performing the LCA calculations. SwolfPy is modular and flexible, which enables it to be easily coupled with other packages and to facilitate the addition of new processes, materials, environmental flows and impacts, and methodologies. SwolfPy uses sequential least‐squares programming for constrained nonlinear optimization to find systems and strategies that minimize cost or environmental emissions and impacts while meeting user‐defined constraints. An illustrative case study with 44 materials, 4 collection processes, and 6 treatment processes is presented, and SwolfPy performs 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations in 16 min and finds optimal solutions in 10–25 min on a Windows 10 machine with a CPU speed of 3.60 GHz and 8 logical processors. This article met the requirements for a Gold‐Gold Badge. JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.

Suggested Citation

  • Mojtaba Sardarmehni & Pedro H. Chagas Anchieta & James W. Levis, 2022. "Solid waste optimization life‐cycle framework in Python (SwolfPy)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 748-762, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:748-762
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13236
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Kühnen & Rüdiger Hahn, 2017. "Indicators in Social Life Cycle Assessment: A Review of Frameworks, Theories, and Empirical Experience," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(6), pages 1547-1565, December.
    2. Stefan Pauliuk & Guillaume Majeau-Bettez & Christopher L. Mutel & Bernhard Steubing & Konstantin Stadler, 2015. "Lifting Industrial Ecology Modeling to a New Level of Quality and Transparency: A Call for More Transparent Publications and a Collaborative Open Source Software Framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(6), pages 937-949, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Wiedmann, 2017. "An input–output virtual laboratory in practice – survey of uptake, usage and applications of the first operational IELab," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 296-312, April.
    2. Golinucci, Nicolò & Tonini, Francesco & Rocco, Matteo Vincenzo & Colombo, Emanuela, 2023. "Towards BitCO2, an individual consumption-based carbon emission reduction mechanism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Hannah Karlewski & Annekatrin Lehmann & Klaus Ruhland & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2019. "A Practical Approach for Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Automotive Industry," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-60, August.
    4. Simone Wurster, 2021. "Creating a Circular Economy in the Automotive Industry: The Contribution of Combining Crowdsourcing and Delphi Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Stefan Gold & Thomas Chesney & Tim Gruchmann & Alexander Trautrims, 2020. "Diffusion of labor standards through supplier–subcontractor networks: An agent‐based model," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1274-1286, December.
    6. Sun, Ya-Yen & Cadarso, Maria Angeles & Driml, Sally, 2020. "Tourism carbon footprint inventories: A review of the environmentally extended input-output approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Matthias Schlipf & Bastian Striegl & Tobias Gaugler, 2024. "Climate true‐cost analysis of industrial goods and its regulatory implications on value chains and global competition," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 589-602, June.
    8. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    9. Tobias Junne & Sonja Simon & Jens Buchgeister & Maximilian Saiger & Manuel Baumann & Martina Haase & Christina Wulf & Tobias Naegler, 2020. "Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Multi-Sectoral Energy Transformation Pathways: Methodological Approach and Case Study for Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Max Rehberger & Michael Hiete, 2020. "Allocation of Environmental Impacts in Circular and Cascade Use of Resources—Incentive-Driven Allocation as a Prerequisite for Cascade Persistence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, May.
    11. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Sara Russo-Garrido & Nicolas Merveille, 2020. "Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Flávio Mattos & João Luiz Calmon, 2023. "Social Life Cycle Assessment in Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems with Contribution of Waste Pickers: Literature Review and Proposals for New Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Zaman Sajid & Nicholas Lynch, 2018. "Financial Modelling Strategies for Social Life Cycle Assessment: A Project Appraisal of Biodiesel Production and Sustainability in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Alberto Bezama & Carlo Ingrao & Sinéad O’Keeffe & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Resources, Collaborators, and Neighbors: The Three-Pronged Challenge in the Implementation of Bioeconomy Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Naghshineh, Bardia & Ribeiro, André & Jacinto, Celeste & Carvalho, Helena, 2021. "Social impacts of additive manufacturing: A stakeholder-driven framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Magdalena Krysiak & Aldona Kluczek, 2021. "A Multifaceted Challenge to Enhance Multicriteria Decision Support for Energy Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Bidhan Bhuson Roy & Qingshi Tu, 2022. "A review of system dynamics modeling for the sustainability assessment of biorefineries," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1450-1459, August.
    18. Parisa Rafiaani & Zoumpolia Dikopoulou & Miet Dael & Tom Kuppens & Hossein Azadi & Philippe Lebailly & Steven Passel, 2020. "Identifying Social Indicators for Sustainability Assessment of CCU Technologies: A Modified Multi-criteria Decision Making," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 15-44, January.
    19. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Aboushaqrah, Nour N.M. & Jabbar, Rateb, 2019. "How sustainable is electric mobility? A comprehensive sustainability assessment approach for the case of Qatar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 461-477.
    20. Ulrike Schinkel & Nadja Becker & Manuel Trapp & Mike Speck, 2022. "Assessing the Contribution of Innovative Technologies to Sustainable Development for Planning and Decision-Making Processes: A Set of Indicators to Describe the Performance of Sustainable Urban Infras," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:748-762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.