IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i3p1136-1146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of community‐based learning in teaching about industrial ecology and sustainability in the context of engineering education: A case study from the field

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea L. Hicks

Abstract

Industrial ecology and sustainability education have evolved over time, as this relatively new discipline has emerged and has been refined. Courses engaging with these topics are often found in engineering departments, and feature project or problem‐based learning (PBL) commonly with an industrial partner. This provides students the opportunity to apply the topics that they have learned in class in a real‐world situation, complete with the constraints and uncertainties inherent in practice. Community‐based learning (CBL), a combination of service learning and PBL, allows students to not only apply the material from a sustainability course, but also to do so in service of a community partner. This work presents an analysis of a multi‐year effort in teaching a CBL course on the topic of industrial ecology and sustainability in a North American context. Knowledge probes are utilized to quantify student preparation for the course and confidence in knowledge gained during the course in a longitudinal manner. Meanwhile, evolving student reflection is utilized to assess the impact of how the CBL element of the course influenced student thinking about the role of sustainability and industrial ecology within engineering education. The findings suggest that applying CBL to industrial ecology education has the potential to further enhance student learning experiences, while also providing a valuable service experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea L. Hicks, 2022. "The role of community‐based learning in teaching about industrial ecology and sustainability in the context of engineering education: A case study from the field," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1136-1146, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:1136-1146
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13224
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Jollands & Raj Parthasarathy, 2013. "Developing Engineering Students’ Understanding of Sustainability Using Project Based Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Yong Geng & Bruce Mitchell & Qinghua Zhu, 2009. "Teaching Industrial Ecology at Dalian University of Technology," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(6), pages 978-989, December.
    3. Katja Brundiers & Arnim Wiek, 2013. "Do We Teach What We Preach? An International Comparison of Problem- and Project-Based Learning Courses in Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Braden R. Allenby & David T. Allen & Cliff I. Davidson, 2007. "Teaching Sustainable Engineering," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 8-10, January.
    5. Han Shi & Yuichi Moriguichi & Jianxin Yang, 2003. "Industrial Ecology in China, Part II Education," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 7(1), pages 5-8, January.
    6. Kristan Cockerill, 2013. "A Failure Reveals Success," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(5), pages 633-641, October.
    7. Wei Ning & Pengyu Chen & Feng Wu & Kristan Cockerill & Nansheng Deng, 2007. "Industrial Ecology Education at Wuhan University," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(3), pages 147-153, July.
    8. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    9. Joyce Smith Cooper & James Fava, 2000. "Teaching Life‐Cycle Assessment at Universities in North America, Part II," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 4(4), pages 7-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté, 2021. "Teaching Industrial Ecology to Undergraduate Students: Lessons Learned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Kangas, Patrick & Seibel, Gary E., 2018. "An industrial ecology teaching exercise on cycling e-waste," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 371(C), pages 119-122.
    3. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Lorenzo Ductor & Sanjeev Goyal & Anja Prummer, 2018. "Gender & Collaboration," Working Papers 856, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    5. Xiaodan Zhou & Ling-Hsiu Chen & Chin-Ling Chen, 2019. "Collaborative Learning by Teaching: A Pedagogy between Learner-Centered and Learner-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Sarah Shandera & Jes L Matsick & David R Hunter & Louis Leblond, 2021. "RASE: Modeling cumulative disadvantage due to marginalized group status in academia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Ian Thomas, 2014. "Special Issue—Pedagogy for Education for Sustainability in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-4, April.
    8. Ayllón, Sara, 2022. "Online teaching and gender bias," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Boring, Anne & Philippe, Arnaud, 2021. "Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Dakota Murray & Clara Boothby & Huimeng Zhao & Vanessa Minik & Nicolas Bérubé & Vincent Larivière & Cassidy R Sugimoto, 2020. "Exploring the personal and professional factors associated with student evaluations of tenure-track faculty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Funk, Patricia & Iriberri, Nagore & Savio, Giulia, 2022. "Does Scarcity of Female Instructors Create Demand for Diversity among Students? Evidence from an M-Turk Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 14190, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Paul Heidhues & Botond KH{o}szegi & Philipp Strack, 2019. "Overconfidence and Prejudice," Papers 1909.08497, arXiv.org.
    13. Wyness, Lynne & Dalton, Fiona, 2018. "The value of problem-based learning in learning for sustainability: Undergraduate accounting student perspectives," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-19.
    14. Valerio Capraro & Hélène Barcelo, 2021. "Punishing defectors and rewarding cooperators: Do people discriminate between genders?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 19-32, September.
    15. Lorenz Probst, 2022. "Higher Education for Sustainability: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence 2013–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    16. Silvia Albareda-Tiana & Salvador Vidal-Raméntol & Maria Pujol-Valls & Mónica Fernández-Morilla, 2018. "Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Hani Mansour & Daniel I. Rees & Bryson M. Rintala & Nathan N. Wozny, 2022. "The Effects of Professor Gender on the Postgraduation Outcomes of Female Students," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(3), pages 693-715, May.
    18. Shogo Kudo & Huma Mursaleen & Barry Ness & Masafumi Nagao, 2018. "Exercise on Transdisciplinarity: Lessons from a Field-Based Course on Rural Sustainability in an Aging Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    19. Matthias Barth & Simon Burandt, 2013. "Adding the “e-” to Learning for Sustainable Development: Challenges and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:1136-1146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.