IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v24y2020i3p681-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental sustainability of orthopedic devices produced with powder bed fusion

Author

Listed:
  • Grazia Maria Cappucci
  • Martina Pini
  • Paolo Neri
  • Marta Marassi
  • Elena Bassoli
  • Anna Maria Ferrari

Abstract

Additive manufacturing consists in melting metallic powders to produce objects from 3D data, layer upon layer. Its industrial applications range from automotive, biomedical (e.g., prosthetic implants for dentistry and orthopedics), aeronautics and others. This study uses life cycle assessment to evaluate the possible improvement in environmental performance of laser‐based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing systems on prosthetic device production. Environmental impacts due to manufacturing, use, and end of life of the designed solution were assessed. In addition, two powder production technologies, gas atomization (GA) and plasma atomization (PA), were compared in order to establish the most sustainable one. Production via traditional subtractive technologies and the additive manufacturing production were also compared. 3D building was found to have a significant environmental advantage compared to the traditional technology. The powder production process considerably influences on a damage point of view the additive manufacturing process; however, its impact can be mitigated if GA powders are employed.

Suggested Citation

  • Grazia Maria Cappucci & Martina Pini & Paolo Neri & Marta Marassi & Elena Bassoli & Anna Maria Ferrari, 2020. "Environmental sustainability of orthopedic devices produced with powder bed fusion," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 681-694, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:3:p:681-694
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12968
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.12968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karel Kellens & Martin Baumers & Timothy G. Gutowski & William Flanagan & Reid Lifset & Joost R. Duflou, 2017. "Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing: Mapping Application Domains and Their Environmental Implications," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 49-68, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han Wang & Martin Baumers & Shreeja Basak & Yinfeng He & Ian Ashcroft, 2022. "The impact of the risk of build failure on energy consumption in additive manufacturing," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1771-1783, October.
    2. Ali Bastas, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies: A Systematic Review of Latest Trends and Themes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Germán Arana-Landín & Naiara Uriarte-Gallastegi & Beñat Landeta-Manzano & Iker Laskurain-Iturbe, 2023. "The Contribution of Lean Management—Industry 4.0 Technologies to Improving Energy Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    3. Kirsi Immonen & Sini Metsä-Kortelainen & Juha Nurmio & Amélie Tribot & Tuomas Turpeinen & Atte Mikkelson & Tomi Kalpio & Otto-Ville Kaukoniemi & Heli Kangas, 2022. "Recycling of 3D Printable Thermoplastic Cellulose-Composite," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Zhichao Liu & Qiuhong Jiang & Fuda Ning & Hoyeol Kim & Weilong Cong & Changxue Xu & Hong-chao Zhang, 2018. "Investigation of Energy Requirements and Environmental Performance for Additive Manufacturing Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Pedro Manuel Hernández-Castellano & María Dolores Martínez-Rivero & María Dolores Marrero-Alemán & Luis Suárez-García & Alejandro Gutiérrez-Barcenilla, 2020. "Open Education through Interactive Training Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. José M. González-Varona & David Poza & Fernando Acebes & Félix Villafáñez & Javier Pajares & Adolfo López-Paredes, 2020. "New Business Models for Sustainable Spare Parts Logistics: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Šuba Roland, 2022. "Sustainability Aspects of Parts Additive Manufacturing from Metal Powder," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 30(50), pages 37-44, June.
    8. Jessika Luth Richter & Sahra Svensson‐Hoglund & Carl Dalhammar & Jennifer D. Russell & Åke Thidell, 2023. "Taking stock for repair and refurbishing: A review of harvesting of spare parts from electrical and electronic products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 868-881, June.
    9. Di He & Hyung Chul Kim & Robert De Kleine & Vi Kie Soo & Alper Kiziltas & Paul Compston & Matthew Doolan, 2022. "Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications of polyamide 12 recycling from selective laser sintering for an injection‐molded automotive component," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1378-1388, August.
    10. Francesco Del Pero & Massimo Delogu & Martin Kerschbaum, 2020. "Design of a Lightweight Rear Crash Management System in a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Chekurov, Sergei & Metsä-Kortelainen, Sini & Salmi, Mika & Roda, Irene & Jussila, Ari, 2018. "The perceived value of additively manufactured digital spare parts in industry: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 87-97.
    12. Buranská Eva & Buranský Ivan & Morovič Ladislav & Líška Katarína, 2019. "Environment and Safety Impacts of Additive Manufacturing: A Review," Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Sciendo, vol. 27(44), pages 9-20, June.
    13. Ana E. Oros Daraban & Catalin S. Negrea & Flavia G. P. Artimon & Dorin Angelescu & Gheorghe Popan & Silviu I. Gheorghe & Marian Gheorghe, 2019. "A Deep Look at Metal Additive Manufacturing Recycling and Use Tools for Sustainability Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Han Wang & Martin Baumers & Shreeja Basak & Yinfeng He & Ian Ashcroft, 2022. "The impact of the risk of build failure on energy consumption in additive manufacturing," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1771-1783, October.
    15. Naiara Uriarte-Gallastegi & Beñat Landeta-Manzano & German Arana-Landín & Iker Laskurain-Iturbe, 2022. "How Do Technologies Based on Cyber–Physical Systems Affect the Environmental Performance of Products? A Comparative Study of Manufacturers’ and Customers’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Mahesh Gopal & Hirpa G. Lemu & Endalkachew Mosisa Gutema, 2022. "Sustainable Additive Manufacturing and Environmental Implications: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Matt Sinclair & Leila Sheldrick & Mariale Moreno & Emma Dewberry, 2018. "Consumer Intervention Mapping—A Tool for Designing Future Product Strategies within Circular Product Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:24:y:2020:i:3:p:681-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.