IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v31y2024i5p1976-1998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexism in the silences at Australian Universities: Parental leave in name, but not in practice

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Duffy
  • Michelle O’Shea
  • Dorothea Bowyer
  • Patrick van Esch

Abstract

Unequal distribution of child rearing and domestic responsibilities between parents contributes to gender inequity, a wicked problem in Australia. Inequitable parental leave policies at Australian public Universities place the burden of care squarely on the mother, diminishing or absenting the father. We examine how the gendered nature of the existing policies are constructed in ways that create inequities and discourage their uptake. A post‐structural feminist lens provides us with a theoretical vantage point from which this wicked problem can be problematized. We present three recommendations for enabling more equitable outcomes for parents. The first is to eradicate the punitive approach and support flexibility; second, the policies must be parental leave in name, provision and practice; and finally we recommend a minimum parental leave standard for Australian universities nationally. These findings have policy‐level significance for redressing parental leave inequity within the Australian university context. The paper concludes with theoretical contributions, practical implications, and suggestions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Duffy & Michelle O’Shea & Dorothea Bowyer & Patrick van Esch, 2024. "Sexism in the silences at Australian Universities: Parental leave in name, but not in practice," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1976-1998, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:1976-1998
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12880
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:1976-1998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.