IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v29y2022i1p273-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Isn't it ironic…!?!” Mobility researchers go sedentary: A group auto‐ethnography on collective coping and care in pandemic times

Author

Listed:
  • Kerstin Martel
  • Monique Raupp
  • Acil Abdul Hadi
  • Emilija Oleškevičiūtė
  • Rodrigo Mello
  • Tania Biswas
  • Giovanna S. Milani

Abstract

We moved places and places moved us, until force majeure detained us on the spot. Signed‐up to be hyper‐mobile Ph.D.‐candidates, we became hyper‐reflective pandemic intimates. We moved together into a space that felt safe, OUR safe space. Suspended. Did the pandemic open this door, or had this space always existed, even back in the old days? Probably the latter, although we were not sensitive enough to perceive it, too busy to push the door, too lonesome to CARE. Not attentive to its possibilities, not imaginative of its POWER, too confident to be capable of succeeding alone. Even if we might have secretly wished for this space to exist. The present piece of work, and JOY, might be described by others as a “side‐step,” a “hobby project,” a “shadow activity.” For us, it is a recollection of shocks and wonders, a sentience of precious, ephemeral instances that last. We are a group of eight early career researchers who study global mobility and labor migration from a variety of disciplinary perspectives. With prior international mobility experience, we left our previous countries of residence in 2018 to join an EU‐funded research project, whilst being located in different European cities. One could classify us, for example, as highly qualified, privileged migrants. The present paper is the outcome of a collaborative, auto‐ethnographic study, conducted in 2020, in the midst of the Covid‐19 pandemic, when we suddenly were forced not to travel anymore. We got together online every week to “refaire le monde,” and we conducted virtual, dialogical self‐interrogations and group reflections. Based on an emic approach, in line with Chang et al. (2013), we applied an iterative process of data collection and analysis. Our weekly conversations naturally emerged as a safe space for exchange and understanding, as we were facing similar situations, despite staying at different places. Suddenly, as the privilege of “always being on the move,” “always socializing and networking” disappeared due to closed borders and pandemic threats, we experienced anxieties and isolation and had to re‐evaluate our perceptions on life, work, and international mobility. The very purpose and meaning of our broader research endeavors and employment perspectives suddenly faded away. We realized more than ever before, what it means to us to be allowed to move, to travel freely across continents.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerstin Martel & Monique Raupp & Acil Abdul Hadi & Emilija Oleškevičiūtė & Rodrigo Mello & Tania Biswas & Giovanna S. Milani, 2022. "“Isn't it ironic…!?!” Mobility researchers go sedentary: A group auto‐ethnography on collective coping and care in pandemic times," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 273-300, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:273-300
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Anteby, 2013. "PERSPECTIVE —Relaxing the Taboo on Telling Our Own Stories: Upholding Professional Distance and Personal Involvement," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1277-1290, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saoirse Caitlin O'Shea, 2020. "Working at gender? An autoethnography," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1438-1449, November.
    2. Sharon Koppman & Elisa Mattarelli & Amar Gupta, 2016. "Third-World “Sloggers” or Elite Global Professionals? Using Organizational Toolkits to Redefine Work Identity in Information Technology Offshore Outsourcing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 825-845, August.
    3. O'Higgins, Ciara & Andreeva, Tatiana & Goya, Nekane Aramburu, 2022. "The hows and whys of foreign operation mode combinations: The role of knowledge processes," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(2).
    4. Anne Antoni & Haley Beer, 2024. "Ethical Sensibilities for Practicing Care in Management and Organization Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 279-294, March.
    5. Prasad, Ajnesh, 2014. "Corporeal ethics in an ethnographic encounter: A tale of embodiment from the Occupied Palestinian Territories," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 525-531.
    6. Alex Wright, 2022. "I, strategist," Post-Print hal-04577428, HAL.
    7. A Rebecca Reuber & Sophie Alkhaled & Helena Barnard & Carole Couper & Innan Sasaki, 2022. "Something borrowed, something new: Challenges in using qualitative methods to study under-researched international business phenomena," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 2147-2166, December.
    8. Tripathi, Vinayak R. & Popli, Manish & Gaur, Ajai, 2022. "Spirituality meets science: Impact of founders’ imprint on healthcare practices for marginal communities in India," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 311-323.
    9. Ramirez, Carlos & Zicari, Adrián, 2024. "Between a corporatist past and a globalised future: Argentina's accounting profession and the social balance sheet," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Reilley, Jacob & Löhlein, Lukas, 2023. "Theorizing (and) the future of interdisciplinary accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau, 2018. "Le Journal de Bord Sibyllique," Post-Print hal-01990906, HAL.
    12. Rashedur Chowdhury, 2023. "Misrepresentation of Marginalized Groups: A Critique of Epistemic Neocolonialism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 553-570, September.
    13. Greg Fisher, 2024. "Resourcefulness Enactment: The Sensemaking Process Underpinning Resourceful Actions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(4), pages 911-940, July.
    14. Lien De Cuyper & Bart Clarysse & Nelson Phillips, 2020. "Imprinting Beyond the Founding Phase: How Sedimented Imprints Develop over Time," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1579-1600, November.
    15. Hee‐Chan Song, 2021. "Buddhist approach to corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3040-3052, November.
    16. Bhattacharyya, Barnini & Erskine, Samantha E. & McCluney, Courtney, 2024. "Not all allies are created equal: An intersectional examination of relational allyship for women of color at work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Anicich, Eric M., 2022. "Flexing and floundering in the on-demand economy: Narrative identity construction under algorithmic management," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Leiting, Ann-Kathrin & De Cuyper, Lien & Kauffmann, Christian, 2022. "The Internet of Things and the case of Bosch: Changing business models while staying true to yourself," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    19. Lambert Jerman & Alaric Bourgoin, 2016. "L'identité négative de l'auditeur," Post-Print hal-01902594, HAL.
    20. Erin Reid, 2015. "Embracing, Passing, Revealing, and the Ideal Worker Image: How People Navigate Expected and Experienced Professional Identities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 997-1017, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:273-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.