IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v17y2018i1p52-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Current State of the Russian Agricultural Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Ilya Kuzminov
  • Leonid Gokhberg
  • Thomas Thurner
  • Elena Khabirova

Abstract

Russia's agriculture produces around 3.7 per cent of the country's GDP, employs 9.2 per cent of the national workforce and contributes around 6 per cent of the country's exports. The sector has shown remarkable resilience in the face of wider economic turbulence. Self†sufficiency rates for the main agricultural commodities are relatively high. Agricultural exports have grown very significantly since 2000 especially for wheat and meslin (wheat and rye mixture). Meat production has been growing steadily, particularly in the poultry and pork sectors. Whilst the agri†food sector has great potential to play an even more prominent role in Russia's economy, it suffers from relatively low productivity and an outdated technological base. The main drive for efficiency has come mainly from the relatively large†scale agricultural firms, who generated more than half of the total value of agricultural output in 2016. Foreign policy instability, including economic sanctions, the devaluation of the national currency and declining economic growth have weakened the sector and caused an increase in the prices of imported goods and equipment. At the same time Russian products have replaced high value†added imports and Russia's agricultural producers are expanding into new markets.L'agriculture russe produit environ 3.7 pour cent du PIB du pays, emploie 9.2 pour cent de la main†d’œuvre nationale et contribue pour environ 6 pour cent aux exportations du pays. Le secteur a fait preuve d'une résilience remarquable face aux turbulences économiques plus larges. Les taux d'autosuffisance pour les principaux produits agricoles primaires sont relativement élevés. Les exportations agricoles ont augmenté de manière très nette depuis 2000, en particulier pour le blé et le méteil (mélange de blé et de seigle). La production de viande a régulièrement augmenté, en particulier dans les secteurs de la volaille et du porc. Le secteur agroalimentaire pourrait jouer un rôle encore plus important dans l’économie russe, mais il souffre d'une productivité relativement faible et d'une base technologique dépassée. Les entreprises agricoles de relativement grande taille, qui ont généré plus de la moitié de la valeur totale de la production agricole en 2016, sont le principal moteur de l'efficience du secteur. L'instabilité de la politique étrangère, y compris les sanctions économiques, la dévaluation de la monnaie nationale et le ralentissement de la croissance économique ont affaibli le secteur et provoqué une augmentation des prix des biens et équipements importés. Dans le même temps, les produits russes ont remplacé les importations à forte valeur ajoutée et les producteurs agricoles russes sont en train de gagner de nouveaux marchés.Die russische Landwirtschaft erwirtschaftet etwa 3.7 Prozent des Bruttoinlandsprodukts, sie beschäftigt 9.2 Prozent der einheimischen Arbeitskräfte und trägt etwa 6 Prozent zu den Exporten des Landes bei. Angesichts der allgemeinen wirtschaftlichen Turbulenzen hat sich der Sektor als bemerkenswert robust erwiesen. Die Selbstversorgungsgrade bei den wichtigsten landwirtschaftlichen Rohstoffen sind relativ hoch. Seit dem Jahr 2000 sind die Agrarexporte vor allem bei Weizen und Mengkorn (eine Mischung aus Weizen und Roggen) sehr stark angestiegen. Die Fleischproduktion ist stetig gewachsen, insbesondere in den Bereichen Geflügel†und Schweinefleisch. Obwohl der Agrar†und Ernährungssektor großes Potential hat, eine noch wichtigere Rolle in der russischen Wirtschaft zu spielen, leidet er unter einer relativ niedrigen Produktivität und einer veralteten Technologie. Effizienzsteigerungen sind vor allem auf die relativ großen landwirtschaftlichen Betriebe zurückzuführen, die im Jahr 2016 mehr als die Hälfte des Gesamtwerts der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion erwirtschafteten. Die außenpolitische Instabilität, einschließlich Wirtschaftssanktionen, die Abwertung der nationalen Währung und ein sinkendes Wirtschaftswachstum haben den Sektor geschwächt und einen Preisanstieg für importierte Güter und Ausrüstung verursacht. Gleichzeitig haben russische Produkte die Importe mit hoher Wertschöpfung ersetzt und Russlands landwirtschaftliche Erzeuger expandieren in neue Märkte.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilya Kuzminov & Leonid Gokhberg & Thomas Thurner & Elena Khabirova, 2018. "The Current State of the Russian Agricultural Sector," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 17(1), pages 52-57, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:52-57
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12184
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajagopal, 2014. "Organizations and Innovation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 3, pages 58-86, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Liefert, William & Liefert, Olga, 2015. "Russia's Potential to Increase Grain Production by Expanding Area," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212045, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Thomas Wolfgang Thurner & Stanislav Zaichenko, 2015. "The Feeding Of The Nine Billion — A Case For Technology Transfer In Agriculture," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 1-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ballatore, Benedetto Francesco, 2021. "The importance of Russia’s agricultural sector in the MENA geopolitics," MPRA Paper 106440, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Mar 2021.
    2. Daria Loginova & Judith Irek, 2022. "Russian meat price transmission and policy interventions in 2014," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    2. Valeriy Makarov & Albert Bakhtizin, 2014. "The Estimation Of The Regions’ Efficiency Of The Russian Federation Including The Intellectual Capital, The Characteristics Of Readiness For Innovation, Level Of Well-Being, And Quality Of Life," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 9-30.
    3. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    4. Adamou, Pr. Rabani & Ibrahim, Boubacar & Bonkaney, Abdou Latif & Seyni, Abdoul Aziz & Idrissa, Mamoudou, 2021. "Niger - Land, climate, energy, agriculture and development: A study in the Sudano-Sahel Initiative for Regional Development, Jobs, and Food Security," Working Papers 308806, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    5. LametK.Maika & Kevin Wachira, 2020. "Effects of organizational culture on strategy implementation in water boards in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(4), pages 15-28, July.
    6. White, Gareth R.T. & Samuel, Anthony, 2019. "Programmatic Advertising: Forewarning and avoiding hype-cycle failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 157-168.
    7. Justus Baron & Jorge Contreras & Martin Husovec & Pierre Larouche, 2019. "Making the Rules: The Governance of Standard Development Organizations and their Policies on Intellectual Property Rights," JRC Research Reports JRC115004, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Samuel Facanha Camara & Brenno Buarque de Lima & Teresa Lenice Nogueira da Gama Mota & Alanna Lima e Silva & Pablo Padilha, 2018. "Gender The Management of Innovation Networks: Possibilities of Collaboration in Light of Game Theory," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 24-34, June.
    9. Caroline Buts & Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Michaël R. J. Dooms & Kim Willems, 2020. "The Economic Impact of Standards in Belgium," International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR), IGI Global, vol. 18(1), pages 44-64, January.
    10. Lanu Kim, 2021. "Geographical Locations of Occupations and Information and Communication Technology: Do Online Tools Impact Where People in the United States Live and Work?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    11. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    12. Daniel Béland & Michael Howlett & Philip Rocco & Alex Waddan, 2020. "Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 269-289, June.
    13. Emil Lucian Crișan & Irina Iulia Salanță & Ioana Natalia Beleiu & Ovidiu Niculae Bordean & Raluca Bunduchi, 2021. "A systematic literature review on accelerators," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 62-89, February.
    14. Glenn Dutcher & Cortney S. Rodet, 2022. "Which two heads are better than one? Uncovering the positive effects of diversity in creative teams," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 884-897, November.
    15. Prince Destiny Ugo, 2017. "Project Quality Management Performance: An Insight to Sustainable Development Initiatives in Oil and Gas Host Communities," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 76-88, December.
    16. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-488 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Joern H. Block & Christian O. Fisch & Mirjam van Praag, 2017. "The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 61-95, January.
    18. Justus Baron & Daniel F. Spulber, 2018. "Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 462-503, September.
    19. Ommen, Nils O. & Blut, Markus & Backhaus, Christof & Woisetschläger, David M., 2016. "Toward a better understanding of stakeholder participation in the service innovation process: More than one path to success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2409-2416.
    20. Moodysson , Jerker & Trippl, Michaela & Zukauskaite, Elena, 2015. "Policy Learning and Smart Specialization Balancing Policy Change and Policy Stability for New Regional Industrial Path Development," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/39, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    21. Serah Njoki Njenga & David Gichuhi & Peter Koome, 2021. "Influence of millennials innovativeness on organization change in the hospitality industry in Naivasha sub-county, Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(7), pages 379-388, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:52-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.