IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecanth/v11y2024i2p159-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How are you, anthropology? Reflections on well‐being and the common good

Author

Listed:
  • John K. Millhauser

Abstract

The articles that compose this special issue of Economic Anthropology represent a sample of the work presented and discussed at the 2023 annual meeting of the Society for Economic Anthropology on the topic of well‐being and the common good. I trace the roots of this conference theme in the midst of the COVID‐19 pandemic and its connections to the literature on the “anthropologies of the good.” I then unpack three themes that emerge across the articles in this special issue: the value of tacking between objective measures and subjective meanings, the productive tension produced by investigating across scales, and patterned variation from which we can build an anthropological theory of the good.

Suggested Citation

  • John K. Millhauser, 2024. "How are you, anthropology? Reflections on well‐being and the common good," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 159-167, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:159-167
    DOI: 10.1002/sea2.12327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12327
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sea2.12327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathryn B H Clancy & Robin G Nelson & Julienne N Rutherford & Katie Hinde, 2014. "Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE): Trainees Report Harassment and Assault," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-9, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy Hinsley & William J Sutherland & Alison Johnston, 2017. "Men ask more questions than women at a scientific conference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Hartshorn, Jessica A. & Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. & Klapwijk, Maartje J. & Marzano, Mariella & Ganley, Rebecca J. & Darr, Molly N., 2023. "Attracting and retaining women in forest entomology and forest pathology," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Nigel Golden & Kadambari Devarajan & Cathleen Balantic & Joseph Drake & Michael T Hallworth & Toni Lyn Morelli, 2021. "Ten simple rules for productive lab meetings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Meredith Nash & Hanne E F Nielsen & Justine Shaw & Matt King & Mary-Anne Lea & Narissa Bax, 2019. "“Antarctica just has this hero factor…”: Gendered barriers to Australian Antarctic research and remote fieldwork," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Patricia E Salerno & Mónica Páez-Vacas & Juan M Guayasamin & Jennifer L Stynoski, 2019. "Male principal investigators (almost) don’t publish with women in ecology and zoology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Fernanda Staniscuaski & Arthur V. Machado & Rossana C. Soletti & Fernanda Reichert & Eugenia Zandonà & Pamela B. Mello-Carpes & Camila Infanger & Zelia M. C. Ludwig & Leticia Oliveira, 2023. "Bias against parents in science hits women harder," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Marvin Reuter & Morten Wahrendorf & Cristina Di Tecco & Tahira M Probst & Antonio Chirumbolo & Stefanie Ritz-Timme & Claudio Barbaranelli & Sergio Iavicoli & Nico Dragano, 2020. "Precarious employment and self-reported experiences of unwanted sexual attention and sexual harassment at work. An analysis of the European Working Conditions Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Christopher D Lynn & Michaela E Howells & Max J Stein, 2018. "Family and the field: Expectations of a field-based research career affect researcher family planning decisions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Stephen J Aguilar & Clare Baek, 2020. "Sexual harassment in academe is underreported, especially by students in the life and physical sciences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Margaret C. Hardy, 2016. "Drafting an Effective Ethical Code of Conduct for Professional Societies: A Practical Guide," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, November.
    11. Auriel M V Fournier & Angus J Holford & Alexander L Bond & Margaret A Leighton, 2019. "Unpaid work and access to science professions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Marilyn Cabay & Bianca L. Bernstein & Melissa Rivers & Natalie Fabert, 2018. "Chilly Climates, Balancing Acts, and Shifting Pathways: What Happens to Women in STEM Doctoral Programs," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-33, January.
    13. Julia Ponomarenko & Romina Garrido & Roderic Guigó, 2017. "Ten Simple Rules on How to Organize a Scientific Retreat," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-8, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:159-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2330-4847 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.