IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v40y2022i4ne12583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Turkey as an emerging donor in the development community: The Turkish‐type Development Assistance Model (TDAM)

Author

Listed:
  • Yunus Turhan

Abstract

Motivation Over the past two decades, development communities have been intensively discussing the development assistance provided by emerging donors. Among these donors, although a relative newcomer to the development scene, Turkey has cut a distinctive figure, portraying itself as a great emerging power of its own accord. Purpose Though the modality of Turkish aid is paraded in the scholarly literature, this growing interest does not specifically explore the catch‐all term of “Turkish‐type development assistance model” (TDAM), developed for Turkish official development assistance (ODA) in 2016 to address the geopolitical, cultural, and religious landscape in a larger context. This article examines TDAM hitherto uncharted terrain, scrutinizing its patterns, characteristics, content, and modality. Methods and approach Applying an interpretive analytical framework allied with critical discourse analysis. Findings This article concludes that the concept of TDAM renders inclusive, cost‐effective, horizontal, peer‐based, and solidarity‐oriented aid relations with the recipient. Juxtaposed with the “virtuous power” paradigm of Turkey, this article reveals four main characteristics of TDAM that separate it from other emerging donors: a multitrack approach, a “human face” emphasis, the proximity of recipients, and a new discourse. Policy implications Turkish‐type debates about the changing landscape of development aid with a more critical analytical approach offer insights for broader development studies. A powerful engagement of Turkish foreign aid within an emerging donor landscape could be a new modality for the development community, thus the analysis of TDAM in this research hints at why this is the case or how this might matter for the evolving politics of aid.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunus Turhan, 2022. "Turkey as an emerging donor in the development community: The Turkish‐type Development Assistance Model (TDAM)," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:4:n:e12583
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12583
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Gore & Charles Gore, 2013. "The New Development Cooperation Landscape: Actors, Approaches, Architecture," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 769-786, August.
    2. Sato, Jin & Shiga, Hiroaki & Kobayashi, Takaaki & Kondoh, Hisahiro, 2011. "“Emerging Donors” from a Recipient Perspective: An Institutional Analysis of Foreign Aid in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 2091-2104.
    3. Clemens Six, 2009. "The Rise of Postcolonial States as Donors: a challenge to the development paradigm?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 1103-1121.
    4. Mark Langan, 2017. "Virtuous power Turkey in sub-Saharan Africa: the ‘Neo-Ottoman’ challenge to the European Union," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 1399-1414, June.
    5. Shalendra Sharma, 2005. "THE WAR AGAINST POVERTY: The Encouraging Truth About Foreign Aid," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 11-25.
    6. Fulya Apaydin, 2012. "Overseas Development Aid Across the Global South: Lessons from the Turkish Experience in Sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 24(2), pages 261-282, April.
    7. repec:bla:devpol:v:26:y:2008:i:5:p:555-584 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Fahimul Quadir, 2013. "Rising Donors and the New Narrative of ‘South–South’ Cooperation: what prospects for changing the landscape of development assistance programmes?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 321-338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandra H Bry, 2017. "The Evolution of South-South Development Cooperation: Guiding Principles and Approaches," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(1), pages 160-175, January.
    2. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.
    3. Kilama, Eric Gabin, 2016. "The influence of China and emerging donors aid allocation: A recipient perspective," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 76-91.
    4. Katarzyna Andrzejczak & Agata Kliber, 2015. "The Model of French Development Assistance – Who Gets the Help?," Dynamic Econometric Models, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 15, pages 89-109.
    5. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2017. "Converging divergence? Unpacking the new geography of 21st century global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 102017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    6. Sung-Mi Kim, 2017. "International Perceptions of South Korea as Development Partner: Attractions and Strategic Implications," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1086-1101, November.
    7. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    8. Thiago Lima, 2021. "Brazil’s Humanitarian Food Cooperation: From an Innovative Policy to the Politics of Traditional Aid," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 10(2), pages 249-274, August.
    9. Keijzer, Niels & Lundsgaarde, Erik, 2018. "When ‘unintended effects’ reveal hidden intentions: Implications of ‘mutual benefit’ discourses for evaluating development cooperation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 210-217.
    10. Naseemullah, Adnan, 2023. "The political economy of national development: A research agenda after neoliberal reform?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Heiner Janus & Stephan Klingebiel & Sebastian Paulo, 2015. "Beyond Aid: A Conceptual Perspective on the Transformation of Development Cooperation," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 155-169, March.
    12. Souha El Khanji, 2022. "Donors’ Interest in Water and Sanitation Subsectors," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 611-654, April.
    13. Emery Roe, 2016. "Policy messes and their management," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(4), pages 351-372, December.
    14. Shankland, Alex & Gonçalves, Euclides, 2016. "Imagining Agricultural Development in South–South Cooperation: The Contestation and Transformation of ProSAVANA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 35-46.
    15. Silke Roth, 2019. "Linguistic Capital and Inequality in Aid Relations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(1), pages 38-54, March.
    16. Carol Brunt & John Casey, 2022. "The impacts of marketization on international aid: Transforming relationships among USAID vendors," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 167-178, August.
    17. Lídia Cabral & Giuliano Russo & Julia Weinstock, 2014. "Brazil and the Shifting Consensus on Development Co-operation: Salutary Diversions from the ‘Aid-effectiveness’ Trail?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 32(2), pages 179-202, March.
    18. Larsen, Rasmus Kløcker & Mamosso, Christiane Alzouma, 2014. "Aid with Blinkers: Environmental Governance of Uranium Mining in Niger," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 62-76.
    19. John Anku & Nathan Andrews & Logan Cochrane, 2022. "The Global Land Rush and Agricultural Investment in Ghana: Existing Knowledge, Gaps, and Future Directions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Monalisa Adhikari, 2018. "India in South Asia: Interaction with Liberal Peacebuilding Projects," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 74(2), pages 160-178, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:4:n:e12583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.