IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v81y2016icp35-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imagining Agricultural Development in South–South Cooperation: The Contestation and Transformation of ProSAVANA

Author

Listed:
  • Shankland, Alex
  • Gonçalves, Euclides

Abstract

This paper discusses South–South cooperation by examining ProSAVANA, a flagship agricultural development program seeking to apply Brazilian experience to Mozambique. ProSAVANA is a joint Japan–Brazil–Mozambique initiative in the savannah zone of Mozambique’s Nacala Corridor region that was initially inspired by the Japan–Brazil PRODECER program in Brazil’s Cerrado region. ProSAVANA subsequently became the focus of fears about land-grabbing in the Nacala Corridor, attracting strong civil society contestation. We show how distinct imaginaries of agricultural development in Mozambique and Brazil were used to mobilize for and against ProSAVANA, thus revealing the contentious nature of the similarity claims underpinning South–South cooperation. In particular, we focus on the role of landscape imaginaries associated with the savannah and the Cerrado. We examine the use in the promotion and contestation of ProSAVANA of visual representations that draw on these imaginaries, including GIS maps of Mozambique’s savannah region made by Brazilian agribusiness consultants and an advocacy video of Brazil’s Cerrado region filmed by Mozambican land rights activists. Noting that the latest ProSAVANA planning documents differ significantly from those expressing its initial vision, we argue that the contestation of ProSAVANA has had a series of productive effects even before the program has moved to full implementation. These productive effects are visible not only in the program itself but also in the wider context of state-society relations shaping debates on South–South cooperation in Mozambique, Brazil, and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Shankland, Alex & Gonçalves, Euclides, 2016. "Imagining Agricultural Development in South–South Cooperation: The Contestation and Transformation of ProSAVANA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 35-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:81:y:2016:i:c:p:35-46
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X15301765
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauro Augusto dos Santos & Alisson Flávio Barbieri & José Alberto Magno de Carvalho & Carla Jorge Machado, 2010. "O cerrado brasileiro: notas para estudo," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG td387, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    2. World Bank, 2009. "Awakening Africa's Sleeping Giant : Prospects for Commercial Agriculture in the Guinea Savannah Zone and Beyond [Le réveil du géant assoupi : Perspectives de l’agriculture commerciale dans les sava," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2640.
    3. Lídia Cabral & Iara Leite, 2015. "ProSAVANA and the Expanding Scope of Accountability in Brazil's Development Cooperation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 6(4), pages 435-445, November.
    4. Borsatto, Ricardo Serra & Carmo, Maristela Simões do, 2013. "A Construção do Discurso Agroecológico no Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem-Terra (MST)," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 51(4), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Dorothea Hilhorst & Loes Weijers & Margit van Wessel, 2012. "Aid Relations and Aid Legitimacy: mutual imaging of aid workers and recipients in Nepal," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(8), pages 1439-1457.
    6. Sérgio Chichava & Jimena Duran & Lídia Cabral & Alex Shankland & Lila Buckley & Tang Lixia & Zhang Yue, 2013. "Brazil and China in Mozambican Agriculture: Emerging Insights from the Field," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 101-115, July.
    7. Xu, Xiuli & Li, Xiaoyun & Qi, Gubo & Tang, Lixia & Mukwereza, Langton, 2016. "Science, Technology, and the Politics of Knowledge: The Case of China’s Agricultural Technology Demonstration Centers in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 82-91.
    8. Cheryl McEwan & Emma Mawdsley, 2012. "Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(6), pages 1185-1209, November.
    9. Clemens Six, 2009. "The Rise of Postcolonial States as Donors: a challenge to the development paradigm?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 1103-1121.
    10. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Cabral, Lídia & Favareto, Arilson & Mukwereza, Langton & Amanor, Kojo, 2016. "Brazil’s Agricultural Politics in Africa: More Food International and the Disputed Meanings of “Family Farming”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-60.
    12. Lídia Cabral & Alex Shankland & Arilson Favareto & Alcides Costa Vaz, 2013. "Brazil–Africa Agricultural Cooperation Encounters: Drivers, Narratives and Imaginaries of Africa and Development," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 53-68, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cabral, Lídia & Favareto, Arilson & Mukwereza, Langton & Amanor, Kojo, 2016. "Brazil’s Agricultural Politics in Africa: More Food International and the Disputed Meanings of “Family Farming”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-60.
    2. Glover, Steven & Jones, Sam, 2019. "Can commercial farming promote rural dynamism in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 110-121.
    3. Oehmke, James F. & Young, Sera L. & Heinemann, Allen W. & Rukuni, Mandivamba & Lyambabaje, Alexandre & Post, Lori A., 2022. "A novel measure of developing countries' agricultural and food policy readiness," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Roberto Veneziani & Luca Zamparelli & Omar S. Dahi & Firat Demir, 2017. "South–South And North–South Economic Exchanges: Does It Matter Who Is Exchanging What And With Whom?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1449-1486, December.
    5. Andrea Pacheco & Carsten Meyer, 2022. "Land tenure drives Brazil’s deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Mike Muller & Horacio Zandamela, 2016. "Can integrated infrastructure investment plans contribute to more effective public spending? The case of Mozambique," WIDER Working Paper Series 162, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Behrooz Morvaridi & Caroline Hughes, 2018. "South–South Cooperation and Neoliberal Hegemony in a Post†aid World," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 867-892, May.
    9. Baumert, Sophia & Fisher, Janet & Ryan, Casey & Woollen, Emily & Vollmer, Frank & Artur, Luis & Zorrilla-Miras, Pedro & Mahamane, Mansour, 2019. "Forgone opportunities of large-scale agricultural investment: A comparison of three models of soya production in Central Mozambique," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    10. Barandiarán, Javiera, 2019. "Lithium and development imaginaries in Chile, Argentina and Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 381-391.
    11. Amanor, Kojo S. & Chichava, Sérgio, 2016. "South–South Cooperation, Agribusiness, and African Agricultural Development: Brazil and China in Ghana and Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 13-23.
    12. Marohn, Carsten & Troost, Christian & Warth, Benjamin & Bateki, Christian & Zijlstra, Mink & Anwar, Faizan & Williams, Benjamin & Descheemaeker, Katrien & Berger, Thomas & Asch, Folkard & Dickhoefer, , 2022. "Coupled biophysical and decision-making processes in grassland systems in East African savannahs – A modelling framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Amanor, Kojo S. & Chichava, Sérgio, 2016. "South–South Cooperation, Agribusiness, and African Agricultural Development: Brazil and China in Ghana and Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 13-23.
    3. Xiaoyu Jiang & Yangfen Chen & Lijuan Wang, 2018. "Can China’s Agricultural FDI in Developing Countries Achieve a Win-Win Goal?—Enlightenment from the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. de Moraes Achcar, Helena, 2022. "South-South cooperation and the re-politicization of development in health," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Lídia Cabral & Poonam Pandey & Xiuli Xu, 2022. "Epic narratives of the Green Revolution in Brazil, China, and India," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 249-267, March.
    6. Roberto Veneziani & Luca Zamparelli & Omar S. Dahi & Firat Demir, 2017. "South–South And North–South Economic Exchanges: Does It Matter Who Is Exchanging What And With Whom?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1449-1486, December.
    7. Cezne, Eric & Hönke, Jana, 2022. "The multiple meanings and uses of South–South relations in extraction: The Brazilian mining company Vale in Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. de Moraes Achcar, Helena, 2022. "South-South cooperation and the re-politicization of development in health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111947, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Marianne Schmink & Jennifer Cairns Smart & Isabel Sitoe & Walter Bowen & Henoque Ribeiro Silva & Carvalho Carlos Ecole & Lenita Haber, 2020. "Challenges and opportunities of trilateral co‐operation: Collaboration by the USA, Brazil and Mozambique on horticultural research, 2011–2015," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(5), pages 575-593, September.
    10. Cabral, Lídia & Favareto, Arilson & Mukwereza, Langton & Amanor, Kojo, 2016. "Brazil’s Agricultural Politics in Africa: More Food International and the Disputed Meanings of “Family Farming”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-60.
    11. Zanella, Matheus A. & Milhorance, Carolina, 2016. "Cerrado meets savannah, family farmers meet peasants: The political economy of Brazil’s agricultural cooperation with Mozambique," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 70-81.
    12. Ye Jin & Qingning Lin & Shiping Mao, 2022. "Tanzanian Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Improved Maize Technology: Analyzing Influencing Factors Using SEM and fsQCA Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Ali, Murad, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation in South-South Cooperation: the case of CPEC in Pakistan," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    14. Gu, Jing & Zhang, Chuanhong & Vaz, Alcides & Mukwereza, Langton, 2016. "Chinese State Capitalism? Rethinking the Role of the State and Business in Chinese Development Cooperation in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 24-34.
    15. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2017. "Converging divergence? Unpacking the new geography of 21st century global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 102017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    16. Rabah Arezki & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2015. "What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 207-233.
    17. Abdul Nafeo Abdulai & Awudu Abdulai, 2016. "Allocative and scale efficiency among maize farmers in Zambia: a zero efficiency stochastic frontier approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(55), pages 5364-5378, November.
    18. Glover, Steven & Jones, Sam, 2019. "Can commercial farming promote rural dynamism in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 110-121.
    19. Yongjun Zhao, 2013. "China–Africa development cooperation in the rural sector: an exploration of land tenure and investments linkages for sustainable resource use," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 355-366, April.
    20. Hong Liu & Celia Lee & Chris Alden, 2022. "The Dynamics of Governance and Sustainable Development Goals in the Global South," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S1), pages 5-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:81:y:2016:i:c:p:35-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.