IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/padxxx/v42y2022i3p167-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impacts of marketization on international aid: Transforming relationships among USAID vendors

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Brunt
  • John Casey

Abstract

The article outlines changing US government strategies in response to growing marketization of international aid and development. As private sector US government vendors, the active, purposive role of for‐profit firms in aid distribution is difficult to appreciate from only an exploration of funding awards. The literature identifies multiple influences on vendor relationships between NGOs and for‐profit firms including new government policies and donor priorities as well as the arrival of new stakeholders. Our review of US official development assistance funding distribution juxtaposes funding awards to NGOs and for‐profit firms between 2011 and 2020, uncovering new patterns that alter our previous understanding of government aid as a public good. The article concludes that marketization of international aid and development reflected in US policy not only alters the composition of stakeholder engagement but has fundamentally transformed aid delivery models, introducing opportunities for flexibility and potential interchangeability among vendors.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Brunt & John Casey, 2022. "The impacts of marketization on international aid: Transforming relationships among USAID vendors," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 167-178, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:42:y:2022:i:3:p:167-178
    DOI: 10.1002/pad.1977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1977
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pad.1977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Korbla Puplampu & Wisdom Tettey, 2000. "State‐NGO relations in an era of globalisation: the implications for agricultural development in Africa," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(84), pages 251-272.
    2. Charles Gore & Charles Gore, 2013. "The New Development Cooperation Landscape: Actors, Approaches, Architecture," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 769-786, August.
    3. Erik Lundsgaarde & Adam Moe Fejerskov, 2018. "Development agencies of the future: The limits of adaptation," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(5), pages 169-178, December.
    4. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    5. Jennifer Greenburg, 2017. "Selling Stabilization: Anxious Practices of Militarized Development Contracting," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 48(6), pages 1262-1286, November.
    6. Korten, David C., 1987. "Third generation NGO strategies: A key to people-centered development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 15(1, Supple), pages 145-159.
    7. Nicola Banks & David Hulme, 2014. "New development alternatives or business as usual with a new face? The transformative potential of new actors and alliances in development," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 181-195, January.
    8. Jiahuan Lu & Jianzhi Zhao, 2019. "How does government funding affect nonprofits' program spending? Evidence from international development organizations," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(2), pages 69-77, May.
    9. Susan Appe, 2017. "Civil Society Organizations in a Post‐Aid World: New Trends and Observations from the Andean Region," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(2), pages 122-135, May.
    10. Susan M. Roberts, 2014. "Development Capital: USAID and the Rise of Development Contractors," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(5), pages 1030-1051, September.
    11. Omar Ramon Serrano Oswald, 2019. "The new architects: Brazil, China, and innovation in multilateral development lending," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(4-5), pages 203-214, October.
    12. Willem Elbers & Luuk Knippenberg & Lau Schulpen, 2014. "Trust Or Control? Private Development Cooperation At The Crossroads," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(1), pages 1-13, February.
    13. Jonathan Rosenberg, 2017. "More than a Question of Agency: Privatized Project Implementation, Accountabilities, and Global Environmental Governance," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 34(1), pages 10-30, January.
    14. Valeria Lauria & Corrado Fumagalli, 2019. "BRICS, the southern model, and the evolving landscape of development assistance: Toward a new taxonomy," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(4-5), pages 215-230, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Kinsbergen & Dirk-Jan Koch & Christine Plaisier & Lau Schulpen, 2022. "Long-Lasting, But Not Transformative. An Ex-post Sustainability Study of Development Interventions of Private Development Initiatives," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 51-76, February.
    2. Adam Moe Fejerskov & Erik Lundsgaarde & Signe Cold-Ravnkilde, 2017. "Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1070-1085, November.
    3. Emmanuel Kumi, 2022. "Domestic resource mobilisation strategies of national non‐governmental organisations in Ghana," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(2), pages 109-127, May.
    4. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    5. Meagher, Kate, 2015. "Leaving no-one behind? Informal economies, economic inclusion, and Islamic extremism in Nigeria," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62140, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Boomsma, Roel & O'Dwyer, Brendan, 2019. "Constituting the governable NGO: The correlation between conduct and counter-conduct in the evolution of funder-NGO accountability relations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-20.
    7. Brinkerhoff, Derick W., 2000. "Democratic Governance and Sectoral Policy Reform: Tracing Linkages and Exploring Synergies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 601-615, April.
    8. Dawood MAMOON & Silvia HERNANDEZ, 2017. "Principle-agent analysis of technology project (LINCOS) in Costa Rica," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 320-351, December.
    9. Brendan Whitty & Jessica Sklair & Paul Robert Gilbert & Emma Mawdsley & Jo‐Anna Russon & Olivia Taylor, 2023. "Outsourcing the Business of Development: The Rise of For‐profit Consultancies in the UK Aid Sector," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(4), pages 892-917, July.
    10. VĂTAVU Sorana & ȚĂRAN Alexandra-Mădălina & MOLDOVAN Nicoleta-Claudia & LOBONȚ Oana-Ramona, 2022. "Does Technical And Democratic Governance Have The Potential To Enhance Health Spending Allocations?," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 251-268, December.
    11. Niels Keijzer & Stephan Klingebiel & Fabian Scholtes, 2020. "Promoting ownership in a “post‐aid effectiveness” world: Evidence from Rwanda and Liberia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 32-49, May.
    12. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2017. "Understanding the Role of National Development Experts in Development Ethnography," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(1), pages 39-63, January.
    13. Sunit Singh & Rama Charan Tripathi, 2010. "Why Do the Bonded Fear Freedom?," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 22(2), pages 249-297, September.
    14. Aline Burni & Benedikt Erforth & Ina Friesen & Christine Hackenesch & Maximilian Hoegl & Niels Keijzer, 2022. "Who Called Team Europe? The European Union’s Development Policy Response During the First Wave of COVID-19," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 524-539, February.
    15. Julie Fisher Melton, 2023. "Democratization from below: Civil society in Tajikistan," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(1), pages 38-48, February.
    16. Atack, Iain, 1999. "Four Criteria of Development NGO Legitimacy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 855-864, May.
    17. Nolte Isabella M., 2019. "Heterogeneous Partnerships in A Fragile Environment: A Study of Motives for Collaboration in Myanmar," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, July.
    18. Büsgen, M., 2006. "NGOs and the search for Chinese civil society environmental non-governmental organisations in the Nujiang campaign," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19180, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    19. Naseemullah, Adnan, 2023. "The political economy of national development: A research agenda after neoliberal reform?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Jan Orbie & Viktor Opsomer & Yentyl Williams & Sarah Delputte & Joren Verschaeve, 2021. "Shielded against risk? European donor co‐ordination in Palestine," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 703-720, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:padxxx:v:42:y:2022:i:3:p:167-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0271-2075 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.