IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v40y2022i2ne12564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solidarity Economy and social inclusion: The Immigrant Fair in Florianópolis, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Annoni
  • Karine de Souza Silva
  • Gabriela Martini dos Santos

Abstract

Motivation The Solidarity Economy movement emerged in Latin America in the 1970s and 1980s as an alternative mode of production led by mutual principles, such as co‐operative work, self‐management, and consensual distribution of economic gains. Much has been developed on its potential to include groups marginalized by capitalism in new development schemes, but to date there has been no work regarding immigrants’ participation specifically. This research aims to fill this gap. Purpose The article investigates the importance of the partnership between institutions in the host country and immigrants to their insertion in the Solidarity Economy Fairs in Florianópolis. It questions to what extent it has furthered income generation, the formation of social identity, and the construction of community ties. Methods and approach The approach is anchored in intervention–research, proposing a socio‐analytical intervention (Aguiar & Rocha, 2007). To pursue qualitative research, an online form was distributed to participants at the Immigrant Fair. The form comprised semi‐structured interviews, with the possibility of giving free answers. Findings The data analysis reveals the nuances of the life trajectory of recent immigrants in Brazil: people, mostly of Latin American origin, over 30 years of age, seeking economic insertion in another country. For them, the Solidarity Economy has offered a possibility for social and economic insertion in Brazil. The opportunity for marginalized populations to engage with the Solidarity Economy offers an effective tool against systemic competition. The Fair operates as an alternative to the insertion into the capitalist market for outsider groups, enabling new ways to conduct economic life within the capitalist economy. Policy implications Our findings suggest that the Fair has provided immigrants both the means to obtain a weekly (although unstable) financial income and their social integration—it requires interaction with other immigrants, state agents, tourists, and the local community. The social isolation resulting from the COVID‐19 pandemic has jeopardized both outcomes. In order to consolidate solidarity ventures and immigrants’ enterprises, there is an urgent need to implement a public policy regarding immigrants’ social and economic rights in Santa Catarina State.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Annoni & Karine de Souza Silva & Gabriela Martini dos Santos, 2022. "Solidarity Economy and social inclusion: The Immigrant Fair in Florianópolis, Brazil," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(2), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:2:n:e12564
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12564
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathryn H. Anderson & Zhen Huang, 2019. "Can immigrants ever earn as much as native workers?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 159-159, April.
    2. Bauhardt, Christine, 2014. "Solutions to the crisis? The Green New Deal, Degrowth, and the Solidarity Economy: Alternatives to the capitalist growth economy from an ecofeminist economics perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 60-68.
    3. Penn Loh & Boone Shear, 2015. "Solidarity economy and community development: emerging cases in three Massachusetts cities," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 244-260, July.
    4. Elena Simina Lakatos & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Viorel Dan & Alina Oana Ciomos & Oana Adriana Crisan & Ghita Barsan, 2018. "Studies and Investigation about the Attitude towards Sustainable Production, Consumption and Waste Generation in Line with Circular Economy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Philippe Eynaud & Jean-Louis Louis Laville & Luciane dos Santos & Swati Banerjee & Flor Avelino & Lars Hulgård, 2019. "Theory of social enterprise and pluralism: Social Movements, Solidarity Economy, and Global South," Post-Print hal-03252100, HAL.
    6. Juri Viehoff, 2019. "Equality of Opportunity in a European Social Market Economy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 28-43, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marzena Smol, 2023. "Inventory and Comparison of Performance Indicators in Circular Economy Roadmaps of the European Countries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 557-584, March.
    2. Sarah-Louise Ruder & Sophia Rose Sanniti, 2019. "Transcending the Learned Ignorance of Predatory Ontologies: A Research Agenda for an Ecofeminist-Informed Ecological Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Elena-Simina Lakatos & Ligia-Maria Nan & Laura Bacali & George Ciobanu & Andreea-Maria Ciobanu & Lucian-Ionel Cioca, 2021. "Consumer Satisfaction towards Green Products: Empirical Insights from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Paul Bisschop & Bas Weel & Jelle Zwetsloot, 2020. "Ethnic Employment Gaps of Graduates in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 577-598, December.
    5. Astrid Agenjo‐Calderón & Lina Gálvez‐Muñoz, 2019. "Feminist Economics: Theoretical and Political Dimensions," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 137-166, January.
    6. Brown, Donal & Brisbois, Marie-Claire & Lacey-Barnacle, Max & Foxon, Tim & Copeland, Claire & Mininni, Giulia, 2023. "The Green New Deal: Historical insights and local prospects in the United Kingdom (UK)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Swati Narayan, 2022. "Fifteen Years of India’s NREGA: Employer of the Last Resort?," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 65(3), pages 779-799, September.
    8. Paul Bisschop & Bas ter Weel & Jelle Zwetsloot, 2020. "Ethnic employment gaps of graduates in the Netherlands," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-068/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    9. John C. Boik, 2020. "Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part II: Motivation and Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Juliette Alenda-Demoutiez & Bruno Boidin, 2019. "Community-based mutual health organisations in Senegal: a specific form of social and solidarity economy?," Post-Print hal-02400072, HAL.
    11. Léa Marchal & Guzman Ourens & Giulia Sabbadini, 2022. "When Immigrants Meet Exporters: A Reassessment of the Immigrant Wage Gap," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03905529, HAL.
    12. Hanaček, Ksenija & Roy, Brototi & Avila, Sofia & Kallis, Giorgos, 2020. "Ecological economics and degrowth: Proposing a future research agenda from the margins," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Alina Monica Danciu & Matthew Greenley & Adelina Paula Cobuz, 2018. "An overview of global e-waste, its effects on developing countries and possible solutions," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 15(1), pages 20-27, June.
    14. Camelia Delcea & Liliana Crăciun & Corina Ioanăș & Gabriella Ferruzzi & Liviu-Adrian Cotfas, 2020. "Determinants of Individuals’ E-Waste Recycling Decision: A Case Study from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Elena-Madalina Vatamanescu & Vlad-Andrei Alexandru & Georgiana Cristea & Loredana Radu & Oana Chirica, 2018. "A Demand-Side Perspective of Bioeconomy: The Influence of Online Intellectual Capital on Consumption," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 536-536, August.
    16. Jan Stenis, 2020. "An Economic Instrument to Improve Migration," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 15-20, January.
    17. Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Konstantinos G. Aravossis & Miltiadis Zamparas & Alexandros Mitsikas, 2019. "Evaluating Circular Economy under a Multi-Parametric Approach: A Technological Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Donato Morea & Gianpaolo Iazzolino, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and circular economy from the perspective of consumers: A cross‐cultural analysis in the cosmetic industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1226-1243, May.
    19. Anne Vorre Hansen & Lars Fuglsang & Faïz Gallouj & Ada Scupola, 2022. "Social entrepreneurs as change makers: expanding public service networks for social innovation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1632-1651, October.
    20. Guangming Yang & Siyi Cheng & Qingqing Gui & Xinlan Chen, 2022. "The Coupling and Coordination Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Green Innovation Efficiency (GIE) and Economic Development Levels in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:2:n:e12564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.