IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v56y2008i1p51-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Chinese Farmers' Decisions to Adopt a Water‐Saving Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Shudong Zhou
  • Thomas Herzfeld
  • Thomas Glauben
  • Yunhua Zhang
  • Bingchuan Hu

Abstract

Chinese farm households (N = 240) were interviewed to understand some of the factors affecting their adoption of a water‐saving technology called the Ground Cover Rice Production System (GCRPS). A logit model was established on the basis of a survey to estimate the determinants of adoption and to simulate impacts of changes in these determinants on adoption potential. There are no significant influences of age and number of laborers on the probability of GCRPS adoption. Male farm managers had higher adoption probabilities than female farm managers. Large farms had higher adoption probability than small farms. Off‐farm occupation of farm managers had negative influences on adoption. Education had complex impacts on GCRPS adoption in China. The farm manager with middle school education had low probability in GCRPS adoption, whereas the farm manager with primary education and high education had high probability of adoption. Previous experience with GCRPS had a positive impact on adoption. Membership in extension service was an important driving factor of adoption. Farmers with high income showed a high probability to adopt GCRPS. Soil type was also an important determinant in GCRPS adoption, probability of GCRPS adoption was very low at red soil, but high at yellow and brown soil. Low reliability of irrigation water supply led to a high rate of adoption, whereas high reliability of water supply led to a low rate of adoption. Nous avons interrogés des ménages agricoles chinois (N = 240) pour comprendre certains des facteurs qui influencent l'adoption de la technologie d'économie de l'eau appelée système de culture du riz sous couvert (Ground Cover Rice Production System – GCRPS). Nous avons établi un modèle logit fondé sur une enquête pour déterminer les facteurs qui favorisent l'adoption de la technologie et pour simuler l'impact d'une modification de ces facteurs sur le potentiel d'adoption. L'âge et le nombre de travailleurs n'ont pas eu d'impact significatif sur la probabilité d'adoption de la technologie. Les probabilités d'adoption étaient plus élevées chez les gestionnaires de ferme masculins que chez les gestionnaires de ferme féminins, et aussi plus élevées dans les fermes de grande taille que dans celles de petite taille. L'occupation d'un emploi hors ferme a eu un impact négatif sur l'adoption de la technologie. La scolarité a eu un impact complexe sur l'adoption de la technologie en Chine. Les gestionnaires de ferme ayant reçu un enseignement intermédiaire présentaient une faible probabilité d'adoption, tandis que ceux ayant reçu un enseignement primaire et secondaire présentaient une probabilité d'adoption élevée. Les expériences antérieures avec le GCRPS ont eu un impact positif sur l'adoption. L'adhésion à un service de vulgarisation a été un important facteur de motivation. Les producteurs à revenus élevés ont montré une forte probabilité d'adoption. Le type de sol était aussi un facteur important: la probabilité d'adoption était très faible dans le cas du sol rouge, mais élevée dans le cas des sols jaune et brun. La fiabilité peu élevée de l'alimentation en eau d'irrigation a entraîné un fort taux d'adoption, tandis qu'une fiabilité très élevée a entraîné un faible taux d'adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Shudong Zhou & Thomas Herzfeld & Thomas Glauben & Yunhua Zhang & Bingchuan Hu, 2008. "Factors Affecting Chinese Farmers' Decisions to Adopt a Water‐Saving Technology," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(1), pages 51-61, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:56:y:2008:i:1:p:51-61
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00116.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00116.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00116.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Green, Gareth P. & Sunding, David L., 1997. "Land Allocation, Soil Quality, And The Demand For Irrigation Technology," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Margriet F. Caswell & David Zilberman, 1986. "The Effects of Well Depth and Land Quality on the Choice of Irrigation Technology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 798-811.
    3. Moser, Christine M. & Barrett, Christopher B., 2003. "The disappointing adoption dynamics of a yield-increasing, low external-input technology: the case of SRI in Madagascar," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 1085-1100, June.
    4. Abdulai, Awudu & Binder, Claudia R., 2006. "Slash-and-burn cultivation practice and agricultural input demand and output supply," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 201-220, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Pei & Wang, Zhigang, 2012. "Factors Affect Chinese Producers' Adoption of a New Production Technology: Survey Results from Chinese Fruits Producers," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16.
    2. Shuhong Wang & Ning Yin & Zhihai Yang, 2021. "Factors affecting sustained adoption of irrigation water-saving technologies in groundwater over-exploited areas in the North China Plain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10528-10546, July.
    3. Kuhn, L. & Hou, L. & Chen, X. & Huang, J., 2018. "Agricultural machinery for cleaner air An analysis of the effectiveness of three policy measures for reducing residue burning in Northern China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277374, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Arriya Mungsunti, 2016. "Muang Fai’ Irrigation System in Northern Thailand: Farming Productivity and Water Use Efficiency," EEPSEA Research Report rr2016048, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Apr 2016.
    5. Morey Burnham & Zhao Ma & Delan Zhu, 2015. "The human dimensions of water saving irrigation: lessons learned from Chinese smallholder farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(2), pages 347-360, June.
    6. Feike, Til & Khor, Ling Yee & Mamitimin, Yusuyunjiang & Ha, Nan & Li, Lin & Abdusalih, Nurbay & Xiao, Haifeng & Doluschitz, Reiner, 2017. "Determinants of cotton farmers’ irrigation water management in arid Northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Hongyu Wang & Xiaolei Wang & Apurbo Sarkar & Fuhong Zhang, 2021. "How Capital Endowment and Ecological Cognition Affect Environment-Friendly Technology Adoption: A Case of Apple Farmers of Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Giovanni Pino & Pierluigi Toma & Cristian Rizzo & Pier Paolo Miglietta & Alessandro M. Peluso & Gianluigi Guido, 2017. "Determinants of Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Water Saving Measures: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Arriya Mungsunti & Kevin A. Parton, 2021. "The Price of Sustainability of a Traditional Irrigation System in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-10, January.
    10. Ding Xiuling & Lu Qian & Li Lipeng & Apurbo Sarkar, 2023. "The Impact of Technical Training on Farmers Adopting Water-Saving Irrigation Technology: An Empirical Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Chunxiao Song & Yue Rong & Ruifeng Liu & Les Oxley & Hengyun Ma, 2022. "Testing the Effects of Water-Saving Technologies Adapted to Drought: Empirical Evidence from the Huang-Huai-Hai Region in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Mariano, Marc Jim & Villano, Renato & Fleming, Euan, 2012. "Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 41-53.
    13. Xinwei Pei & Xinger Zheng & Cong Wu, 2024. "How Part-Time Farming Affects Cultivated Land Use Sustainability: Survey-Based Assessment in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Ratchaneewan Chuchird & Nophea Sasaki & Issei Abe, 2017. "Influencing Factors of the Adoption of Agricultural Irrigation Technologies and the Economic Returns: A Case Study in Chaiyaphum Province, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Awudu Abdulai & Wallace Huffman, 2014. "The Adoption and Impact of Soil and Water Conservation Technology: An Endogenous Switching Regression Application," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(1), pages 26-43.
    2. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Perry, C. J., 2007. "Why is agricultural water demand unresponsive at low price ranges?," IWMI Books, Reports H040602, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Abdulai, Awudu & Glauben, Thomas & Herzfeld, Thomas & Zhou, Shudong, 2005. "Water Saving Technology in Chinese Rice Production - Evidence from Survey Data," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24708, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Moreno, Georgina & Sunding, David L., 2000. "Irrigation Technology Investment When The Price Of Water Is Stochastic," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21730, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Perry, C. J., 2007. "Why is agricultural water demand unresponsive at low price ranges?," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    6. Mariano, Marc Jim & Villano, Renato & Fleming, Euan, 2012. "Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 41-53.
    7. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2013. "Optimal Investment in Precision Irrigation Systems: A Dynamic Intraseasonal Approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149920, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Nian, Yefan & Huang, Qiuqiong & Kovacs, Kent, 2018. "The Use of Irrigation Practices by Arkansas Producers: The Impacts and Influencing Factors," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266639, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Dominic T. Konja, 2022. "Technology Adoption and Output Difference Among Groundnut Farmers in Northern Ghana," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 303-320, February.
    10. Alcon, Francisco & Tapsuwan, Sorada & Martínez-Paz, José M. & Brouwer, Roy & de Miguel, María D., 2014. "Forecasting deficit irrigation adoption using a mixed stakeholder assessment methodology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 183-193.
    11. Moreno, Georgina & Sunding, David L., 2003. "Simultaneous Estimation Of Technology Adoption And Land Allocation," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22134, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Hänke, Hendrik & Barkmann, Jan & Blum, Lloyd & Franke, Yvonne & Martin, Dominic A. & Niens, Jasnna & Osen, Kristina & Uruena, Viviana & Witherspoon, S. Annette & Wurz, Annemarie, 2018. "Socio-economic, land use and value chain perspectives on vanilla farming in the SAVA Region (north-eastern Madagascar): The Diversity Turn Baseline Study (DTBS)," DARE Discussion Papers 1806, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    13. Pronti, Andrea & Auci, Sabrina & Berbel, Julio, 2024. "Water conservation and saving technologies for irrigation. A structured literature review of econometric studies on the determinants of adoption," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    14. Chatterjee, Diti & Dinar, Ariel & González-Rivera, Gloria, 2019. "Impact of Agricultural Extension on Irrigated Agriculture Production and Water Use in California," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2019.
    15. Giuseppe Maggio & Marina Mastrorillo & Nicholas J. Sitko, 2022. "Adapting to High Temperatures: Effect of Farm Practices and Their Adoption Duration on Total Value of Crop Production in Uganda," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 385-403, January.
    16. Christopher B. Barrett & Christine M. Moser & Oloro V. McHugh & Joeli Barison, 2004. "Better Technology, Better Plots, or Better Farmers? Identifying Changes in Productivity and Risk among Malagasy Rice Farmers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(4), pages 869-888.
    17. Christina Handschuch & Meike Wollni, 2016. "Improved production systems for traditional food crops: the case of finger millet in western Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(4), pages 783-797, August.
    18. Boyer, Christopher N. & Larson, James A. & Roberts, Roland K. & McClure, Angela T. & Tyler, Donald D., 2014. "The impact of field size and energy cost on the profitability of supplemental corn irrigation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 61-69.
    19. Alain Ayong Le Kama & Agnès Tomini, 2012. "Water Conservation versus Soil Salinity Control," Working Papers hal-04141151, HAL.
    20. Khanna, Madhu & Zilberman, David, 1997. "Incentives, precision technology and environmental protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 25-43, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:56:y:2008:i:1:p:51-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.