IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i4p3463-3479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring sustainable development goals adoption in supply chain management: A typology of coexisting institutional logics

Author

Listed:
  • Liliane Carmagnac
  • Minelle E. Silva
  • Morgane M. C. Fritz

Abstract

Despite growing interest in the 17 United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs), companies still struggle with how to implement them as part of their sustainability policies. Hence, we explore how the SDGs are adopted in supply chain management (SCM) using institutional logic as a theoretical lens. Based on a case study, we analyse 10 interviews conducted with managers and suppliers of a multinational cosmetics company recognised for its sustainability engagement. Our findings show that while the strategic level embraces the SDG framework, supply management processes are exclusively evident at the operational level. This becomes even more salient in the analysis of sustainability and commercial coexisting logics. Although sustainability logic concerns compliance with sustainability‐related regulations and external pressures, commercial logic demonstrates the effective engagement of strategic decisions in favor of profitability. Our results reveal nuances in the existing gap between the SDGs and SCM, illustrated through a typology of coexisting logics at the strategic and operational levels, adding value to the SCM literature. This paper questions the feasibility of implementing the UN SDGs along a supply chain, which opens the door for future research and new practical insights relevant to companies' daily operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliane Carmagnac & Minelle E. Silva & Morgane M. C. Fritz, 2024. "Exploring sustainable development goals adoption in supply chain management: A typology of coexisting institutional logics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3463-3479, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:3463-3479
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3661
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gold, Stefan & Schleper, Martin C., 2017. "A pathway towards true sustainability: A recognition foundation of sustainable supply chain management," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 425-429.
    2. Josef-Peter Schöggl & Morgane M.C. Fritz & Rupert Baumgartner, 2016. "Toward supply chain-wide sustainability assessment: a conceptual framework and an aggregation method to assess supply chain performance," Post-Print hal-02547245, HAL.
    3. Royston Greenwood & Amalia Magán Díaz & Stan Xiao Li & José Céspedes Lorente, 2010. "The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 521-539, April.
    4. Xiaoli Zhao & Pavel Castka & Cory Searcy, 2020. "ISO Standards: A Platform for Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Minelle E. Silva & Marina D. Figueiredo, 2017. "Sustainability as Practice: Reflections on the Creation of an Institutional Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Minelle E. Silva & Breno Nunes, 2022. "Institutional logic for sustainable purchasing and supply management: Concepts, illustrations, and implications for business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1138-1151, March.
    7. Glover, J.L. & Champion, D. & Daniels, K.J. & Dainty, A.J.D., 2014. "An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 102-111.
    8. Niloufar Fallah Shayan & Nasrin Mohabbati-Kalejahi & Sepideh Alavi & Mohammad Ali Zahed, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & David Talbot & Laurence Guillaumie, 2022. "Legitimizing unsustainable practices: The institutional logics of pro‐pesticide organizations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2284-2298, July.
    10. Robin Von Haartman & Lars Bengtsson, 2018. "Sustainable global purchasing: assessing the relative impact of sustainability goals and programs," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 169-188.
    11. Madeleine Pullman & Annachiara Longoni & Davide Luzzini, 2018. "EMERGING DISCOURSE INCUBATOR: The Roles of Institutional Complexity and Hybridity in Social Impact Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(2), pages 3-20, April.
    12. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio, 2020. "Pursuing supply chain sustainable development goals through the adoption of green practices and enabling technologies: A cross-country analysis of LSPs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Konrad Zimmer & Magnus Fröhling & Frank Schultmann, 2016. "Sustainable supplier management -- a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 1412-1442, March.
    14. Frank Montabon & Mark Pagell & Zhaohui Wu, 2016. "Making Sustainability Sustainable," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 11-27, April.
    15. Smith, Hannah & Discetti, Roberta & Bellucci, Marco & Acuti, Diletta, 2022. "SMEs engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals: A power perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 112-122.
    16. Royston Greenwood & C. R. Hinings & Dave Whetten, 2014. "Rethinking Institutions and Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7), pages 1206-1220, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minelle E. Silva & Breno Nunes, 2022. "Institutional logic for sustainable purchasing and supply management: Concepts, illustrations, and implications for business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1138-1151, March.
    2. McMullin, Caitlin, 2018. "Co-production and the third sector: A comparative study of England and France," Thesis Commons 578d3, Center for Open Science.
    3. Francesco Testa & Olivier Boiral & Fabio Iraldo, 2018. "Internalization of Environmental Practices and Institutional Complexity: Can Stakeholders Pressures Encourage Greenwashing?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 287-307, January.
    4. Joyce C. Wang & Jingtao Yi & Xiuping Zhang & Mike W. Peng, 2022. "Pyramidal Ownership and SOE Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1839-1868, November.
    5. Paul F. Skilton & Ednilson Bernardes, 2022. "Normal misconduct in the prescription opioid supply chain," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 6-29, October.
    6. Aline Pietrix Seepma & Dirk Pieter van Donk & Carolien de Blok, 2021. "On publicness theory and its implications for supply chain integration: The case of criminal justice supply chains," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(3), pages 72-103, July.
    7. Ricciardi, Francesca & De Bernardi, Paola & Cantino, Valter, 2020. "System dynamics modeling as a circular process: The smart commons approach to impact management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Dean Xu & Chuang Chen & Xiaohui Wu, 2019. "Ownership structure and the use of non-family executives in family-dominated Chinese listed firms: An institutional logics perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 797-820, September.
    9. Vivek Soundararajan & Miriam M. Wilhelm & Andrew Crane, 2021. "Humanizing Research on Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Building a Path to Decent Work," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(2), pages 3-13, April.
    10. Ivana Milosevic & A. Erin Bass & Ben Schulte, 2023. "The Interplay of Conflicting and Complementing Institutional Logics in Sustainability Practices," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 469-506, June.
    11. Kai-Chong Thong & Wai-Peng Wong, 2018. "Pathways for Sustainable Supply Chain Performance—Evidence from a Developing Country, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Else, Tim & Choudhary, Sonal & Genovese, Andrea, 2022. "Uncovering sustainability storylines from dairy supply chain discourse," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 858-874.
    13. Fulzele, Vijayta & Shankar, Ravi, 2022. "Improving freight transportation performance through sustainability best practices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 285-299.
    14. Renate E. Meyer & Markus A. Höllerer, 2014. "Does Institutional Theory Need Redirecting?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(7), pages 1221-1233, November.
    15. Fritz, Morgane MC & Ruel, Salomée & Kallmuenzer, Andreas & Harms, Rainer, 2021. "Sustainability management in supply chains: the role of familiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Kelsey M. Taylor & Eugenia Rosca, 2023. "Sink, swim, or drift: How social enterprises use supply chain social capital to balance tensions between impact and viability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(2), pages 62-86, April.
    17. Glover, Jane & Touboulic, Anne, 2020. "Tales from the countryside: Unpacking “passing the environmental buck” as hypocritical practice in the food supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 33-46.
    18. Minelle E. Silva & Marina D. Figueiredo, 2017. "Sustainability as Practice: Reflections on the Creation of an Institutional Logic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Gizem ARAS BEGER, 2024. "How Competing Institutional Logics Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Benefits: the Mediating Role of Paradox Mindset and Multi-Stakeholders," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1913-1951, March.
    20. Evgeniya Lupova-Henry & Sam Blili & Cinzia Dal Zotto, 2021. "Clusters as institutional entrepreneurs: lessons from Russia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:3463-3479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.