IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v79y2023i3p2757-2769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hospital profiling using Bayesian decision theory

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Hengelbrock
  • Johannes Rauh
  • Jona Cederbaum
  • Maximilian Kähler
  • Michael Höhle

Abstract

For evaluating the quality of care provided by hospitals, special interest lies in the identification of performance outliers. The classification of healthcare providers as outliers or non‐outliers is a decision under uncertainty, because the true quality is unknown and can only be inferred from an observed result of a quality indicator. We propose to embed the classification of healthcare providers into a Bayesian decision theoretical framework that enables the derivation of optimal decision rules with respect to the expected decision consequences. We propose paradigmatic utility functions for two typical purposes of hospital profiling: the external reporting of healthcare quality and the initiation of change in care delivery. We make use of funnel plots to illustrate and compare the resulting optimal decision rules and argue that sensitivity and specificity of the resulting decision rules should be analyzed. We then apply the proposed methodology to the area of hip replacement surgeries by analyzing data from 1,277 hospitals in Germany which performed over 180,000 such procedures in 2017. Our setting illustrates that the classification of outliers can be highly dependent upon the underlying utilities. We conclude that analyzing the classification of hospitals as a decision theoretic problem helps to derive transparent and justifiable decision rules. The methodology for classifying quality indicator results is implemented in an R package (iqtigbdt) and is available on GitHub.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Hengelbrock & Johannes Rauh & Jona Cederbaum & Maximilian Kähler & Michael Höhle, 2023. "Hospital profiling using Bayesian decision theory," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2757-2769, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:3:p:2757-2769
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13798
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter C. Austin, 2002. "A Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Profiling Hospital Performance," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(2), pages 163-172, April.
    2. David Spiegelhalter & Christopher Sherlaw‐Johnson & Martin Bardsley & Ian Blunt & Christopher Wood & Olivia Grigg, 2012. "Statistical methods for healthcare regulation: rating, screening and surveillance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 175(1), pages 1-47, January.
    3. Beaussier, Anne-Laure & Demeritt, David & Griffiths, Alex & Rothstein, Henry, 2020. "Steering by their own lights: Why regulators across Europe use different indicators to measure healthcare quality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 501-510.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beaussier, Anne-Laure & Demeritt, David & Griffiths, Alex & Rothstein, Henry, 2020. "Steering by their own lights: Why regulators across Europe use different indicators to measure healthcare quality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 501-510.
    2. Tetiana Vasylieva & Beata Gavurova & Tetiana Dotsenko & Svitlana Bilan & Marcin Strzelec & Samer Khouri, 2023. "The Behavioral and Social Dimension of the Public Health System of European Countries: Descriptive, Canonical, and Factor Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-35, March.
    3. Nicholas T. Longford, 2020. "Performance assessment as an application of causal inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(4), pages 1363-1385, October.
    4. Francesca Ieva & Anna Paganoni, 2015. "Detecting and visualizing outliers in provider profiling via funnel plots and mixed effect models," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 166-172, June.
    5. Vidoli, F. & Fusco, E. & Pignataro, G. & Guccio, C., 2024. "Multi-directional Robust Benefit of the Doubt model: An application to the measurement of the quality of acute care services in OECD countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Maria Cristiana Martini & Luigi Fabbris, 2017. "Beyond Employment Rate: A Multidimensional Indicator of Higher Education Effectiveness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 351-370, January.
    7. Sai H. Dharmarajan & Douglas E. Schaubel & Rajiv Saran, 2018. "Evaluating center performance in the competing risks setting: Application to outcomes of wait†listed end†stage renal disease patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 289-299, March.
    8. Duen-Yian Yeh & Ching-Hsue Cheng, 2016. "Performance Management of Taiwan’s National Hospitals," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 187-213, January.
    9. Olivier Borraz & Anne‐Laure Beaussier & Mara Wesseling & David Demeritt & Henry Rothstein & Marijke Hermans & Michael Huber & Regine Paul, 2022. "Why regulators assess risk differently: Regulatory style, business organization, and the varied practice of risk‐based food safety inspections across the EU," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 274-292, January.
    10. Nicholas Tibor Longford, 2016. "Decision Theory Applied to Selecting the Winners, Ranking, and Classification," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(4), pages 420-442, August.
    11. Li Wang & David Demeritt & Henry Rothstein, 2023. "“Carrying the black pot”: Food safety and risk in China's reactive regulatory state," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 469-490, April.
    12. David I. Ohlssen & Linda D. Sharples & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2007. "A hierarchical modelling framework for identifying unusual performance in health care providers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(4), pages 865-890, October.
    13. Pereira, Miguel Alves & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2022. "Is sunshine regulation the new prescription to brighten up public hospitals in Portugal?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Jamieson Gilmore, Kendall & Corazza, Ilaria & Coletta, Lucrezia & Allin, Sara, 2023. "The uses of Patient Reported Experience Measures in health systems: A systematic narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-10.
    15. Vidoli, F.; & Fusco, E.; & Pignataro, G.; & Guccio, C.;, 2023. "Multi-directional Robust Benefit of the Doubt model: a comprehensive measure for the quality of health care in OECD countries," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 23/14, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    16. Du, Lilun & Wen, Mengtao, 2023. "False discovery rate approach to dynamic change detection," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Alessandra Guglielmi & Francesca Ieva & Anna M. Paganoni & Fabrizio Ruggeri & Jacopo Soriano, 2014. "Semiparametric Bayesian models for clustering and classification in the presence of unbalanced in-hospital survival," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 25-46, January.
    18. Klein, Silvia & Rauh, Johannes & Pauletzki, Jürgen & Klakow-Franck, Regina & Zander-Jentsch, Britta, 2023. "Introduction of quality indicators in German hospital capacity planning – Do results show an improvement in quality?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:3:p:2757-2769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.